Upcoming SlideShare
×

# Effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device

• 208 views

• Comment goes here.
Are you sure you want to
Be the first to comment
Be the first to like this

Total Views
208
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Shares
5
0
Likes
0

No embeds

### Report content

No notes for slide

### Transcript

• 1. Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device Harold A. Caparida Jhun Bryan V. Cenabre Raldey T. Lape ___________________________________________________________________ Computer Engineering Department College of Engineering Education University of Mindanao September 7, 2013
• 2. Statement of the Problem Specifically, to attain the following objectives: • To determine the average values using the following parameters for the floating sensor design: a) Water level: • Actual Reading; • Displayed Reading; and • Transmitted Reading b) Response time of the system ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device
• 3. Statement of the Problem • To determine the average values using the following parameters for the ultrasonic sensor design: – Water level: • Actual Reading; • Displayed Reading; and • Transmitted Reading – Response time of the system • To determine the physical specifications of the designs, namely: – Floating Sensor; and – Ultrasonic Sensor ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device
• 4. Statement of the Problem • To identify the cost to develop the designs, namely: – Floating Sensor; and – Ultrasonic Sensor • To determine if there exists a significant difference in the actual, displayed and transmitted values of the water level reading for the floating sensor design. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device
• 5. Statement of the Problem • To determine if there exists a significant difference in the actual, displayed and transmitted values of the water level reading for the ultrasonic sensor design. • To determine if there exists a significant difference in the response time of the system for the floating sensor and the ultrasonic sensor designs ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device
• 6. Table 1. The Average Values of Parameters Using the Floater Design Parameters Averages a) Water Level Actual Reading 121.50 inches Displayed Reading 121.50 inches Transmitted Reading 121.50 inches b) Response Time 24 seconds Table 2. The Average Values of Parameters Using the Ultrasonic Sensor Parameters Averages a) Water Level Actual Reading 87.50 inches Displayed Reading 87.50 inches Transmitted Reading 87.50 inches b) Response Time 359 seconds ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device
• 7. Table 5. The Costs to Develop the Designs Design Development Cost Floater Design ₱ 8296.50 Ultrasonic Sensor Design ₱ 7680.00 ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device
• 8. Table 6. Analysis of Variance on Water Level Readings using the Floater Design Source of Variation df SS MS F – value Computed Tabular Between Groups 2 0 0 0 3.59 Within Group 17 42 072.41 2 474.85 α = 0.05 Total 19 42 072.41 Table 7. Analysis of Variance on Water Level Readings using the Ultrasonic Design Source of Variation df SS MS F – value Computed Tabular Between Groups 2 0 0 0 3.59 Within Group 17 21 820.32 1 283.55 α = 0.05 Total 19 21 820.32 ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device
• 9. Table 8. t-test Result Comparing Floater Design and Ultrasonic Sensor Design on Response Time in Seconds Response Time in seconds of n Mean T – Value df Decision Computed Tabular Floater Design 20 24 2.246 1.711** 24 Reject Sonar Design 6 359 ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device
• 10. Conclusion The following are the conclusions of the researchers on testing the effectiveness of the telemetric flood monitoring device: • In water level reading of floating sensor design, NO significant difference, H01 accepted • In water level reading of ultrasonic sensor design, NO significant difference, H02 accepted • In response time between designs, HAS Significant difference, H03 rejected ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device
• 11. Recommendation For the further studies, the proponents suggest the following recommendations: • The testing on the response time on the messaging to multiple recipients; • The online application of the device’s status; and • The addition of more trials for a more precise and accurate data gathering. ________________________________________________________________________________________ Effectiveness of the Telemetric Flood Monitoring Device