S P O T T I N G T H E F U T U R E
H O R I Z O N S C A N N I N G I N A R M E N I A , E G Y P T A N D G E O R G I A
Alberto ...
D ATA A N D F I N D I N G S
PA R T O N E
P U R P O S E
• Spot The Future (STF) is a foresight
exercise on Armenia, Egypt and Georgia.
It engages social innovators,...
M E T H O D S & D ATA
• Edgeryders and UNDP collected and
analyzed ethnographic data by fostering
an online conversation i...
M A S S I V E O N L I N E
E T H N O G R A P H Y
• Ethnographic coding was applied to 161
posts and 782 comments on the
Edg...
H O W I S I T D O N E ?
• Seed a conversation through high-quality
content that is relevant to the theme. Start with
peopl...
N O T T H E U S U A L
S U S P E C T S
• Participants in STF were mostly 21-30
years old; socially active; and
community-or...
C O M M I T T E D T O A C T I O N
T H E PA R T I C I PA N T S ’ P R O J E C T S A N D T H E I R K E Y W O R D S B Y C O U ...
E X A M P L E P R O J E C T S :
C O M M U N I T Y- B U I LT R I N G
R O A D R A M P S
• The citizens of the Al-Mu’tamidiya...
E X A M P L E P R O J E C T S :
C A R P O O L I N G I N
A R M E N I A
• A young woman created a Facebook group
(Carpool Հա...
E X A M P L E P R O J E C T S :
G I R L S W H O C O D E I N
T B I L I S I
• JumpStart Georgia noticed that
participation t...
S Y S T E M I C
C H A L L E N G E S
• The challenges mentioned in the data
are mostly consistent with MyWorld
2015 survey:...
T O P - D O W N
A P P R O A C H E S
• In their everyday work, changemakers are
challenged by bureaucracy, vertical
hierarc...
D E A L I N G W I T H T O P -
D O W N A P P R O A C H E S
• Support each other, sharing human and
other resources.
• Lobby...
C O L L A B O R AT I O N
I S H A R D
• Individuals and organisations
trying to affect change perceive
each other as compet...
C O L L A B O R AT I O N
I S T H E WAY T O G O
• “Cooperation” is by far the tag
recurring most often.
• Appreciation was ...
F I N D I N G
M O T I VAT I O N
• Changemakers and activists perceive
themselves and their peers as indifferent
and skepti...
V E C T O R S O F C H A N G E
PA R T T W O
N E W P L AY E R S I N
T H E G A M E
• Young changemakers are on the move to
achieve positive change. Most of them are
new...
C O O P E R AT I O N
A N D S WA R M I N G
• Peer-to-peer cooperation is perceived as the
main for their initiatives to gro...
I N T E R FA C I N G W I T H
I N S T I T U T I O N S
• The traditional grant cycle model is perceived
as distorsive and ob...
D E M O C R AT I C
T E C H N O L O G I E S
• In their struggle for effective action, young
changemakers use a mix of DIY a...
C O N TA C T
Edgeryders LBG
Find out more at http://
company.edgeryders.eu
Or write to alberto@edgeryders.eu
Photo credits...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Spot The Future: detecting change at the edge of society in Armenia, Egypt and Georgia

190

Published on

Spot The Future attempts to foresee near-future changes in Armenia, Egypt and Georgia by focusing on changemakers at the edge of society. The main method used is online ethnography. In this report, we explore our methodology, data, results, and policy implications.

Published in: Government & Nonprofit
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
190
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Spot The Future: detecting change at the edge of society in Armenia, Egypt and Georgia

  1. 1. S P O T T I N G T H E F U T U R E H O R I Z O N S C A N N I N G I N A R M E N I A , E G Y P T A N D G E O R G I A Alberto Cottica, Inga Popovaite, Noemi Salantiu 30 July 2014 Photo: Medhin Paolos
  2. 2. D ATA A N D F I N D I N G S PA R T O N E
  3. 3. P U R P O S E • Spot The Future (STF) is a foresight exercise on Armenia, Egypt and Georgia. It engages social innovators, hackers, activists and other would-be changemakers, mostly from the fringes of the economy and society, based on the premise that societal novelty starts at the edge. • Its objective is to gain insight about near- future dynamics impacting post-2015 Development Goals, building on the engagement of over 3 million people in the UNDG World We Want consultations.
  4. 4. M E T H O D S & D ATA • Edgeryders and UNDP collected and analyzed ethnographic data by fostering an online conversation in March-June 2014. It built upon the World We Want consultation processes. • The dataset consists of 161 posts and 782 comments from 128 individuals from 22 countries. We targeted social innovators, activists, changemakers. • Preliminary results were validated during a focus group discussion that took place in late June 2014, involving 8 participants.
  5. 5. M A S S I V E O N L I N E E T H N O G R A P H Y • Ethnographic coding was applied to 161 posts and 782 comments on the Edgeryders platform. Coding is a standard ethnographic technique. It consists of reading all contributions and assigning relevant keywords to snippets of texts. • Keywords become then second-order data, and can be analysed in various ways. • 243 tags in 6 categories were identified as recurring all along the STF conversation.
  6. 6. H O W I S I T D O N E ? • Seed a conversation through high-quality content that is relevant to the theme. Start with people “at the edge” and traverse the social graph through social media. • Grow your conversation by community management, respectful interaction and connecting people to each other. • Harvest it by ethnographic software, built into the Edgeryders platform. • People select themselves to participate. This ensures enthusiasm and eliminates researcher selection bias (the “usual suspects” effect).
  7. 7. N O T T H E U S U A L S U S P E C T S • Participants in STF were mostly 21-30 years old; socially active; and community-oriented. • Diverse professional identities: architects, designers, researchers, documentary film makers, engineers, yoga instructors… • Not afraid to step in and take initiatives. • Most were not “usual suspects” UNDP works with.
  8. 8. C O M M I T T E D T O A C T I O N T H E PA R T I C I PA N T S ’ P R O J E C T S A N D T H E I R K E Y W O R D S B Y C O U N T RY E N V I R O N M E N T, A LT E R N AT I V E E C O N O M Y, I N C L U S I O N , E M P O W E R M E N T, I N F O R M A L E D U C AT I O N E N V I R O N M E N T, U R B A N P L A N N I N G , G E N D E R I S S U E S , E D U C AT I O N , C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T, S O L I D A R I T Y, M E D I A E N V I R O N M E N T, U R B A N P L A N N I N G , G E N D E R I S S U E S , I C T, R O A D S A F E T Y, S O L I D A R I T Y, M E D I A
  9. 9. E X A M P L E P R O J E C T S : C O M M U N I T Y- B U I LT R I N G R O A D R A M P S • The citizens of the Al-Mu’tamidiya community in Cairo built four ramps to access the ring road from their neighborhood. • Formally illegal, they were built to government specifications. Their cost is estimated at 25% of what the government would have spent to do the same work. • Construction happened at the time of the revolution, when the security apparatus was busy in Tahrir Square. The post-revolution government decided to accept the ramps as a citizen-funded improvement and built a police station nearby. “ T H E P E O P L E O F A L - M U ’ TA M I D I YA N E E D E D T O B U I L D T H I S E X I T F R O M A L O N G T I M E A G O A N D W H E N T H E C H A N C E O P E N E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I N G I T T H E Y T O O K T H E C H A N C E D U R I N G T H E T E M P O R A RY C O L L A P S E O F L O C A L A U T H O R I T I E S . ”
  10. 10. E X A M P L E P R O J E C T S : C A R P O O L I N G I N A R M E N I A • A young woman created a Facebook group (Carpool Հայաստան) to coordinate on sharing rides. This happened in July 2013, in response to an increase of public transport prices in Yerevan. • A massive response from society drove the city authorities to reverse the price increase – but the level of trust in strangers had increased for good. • Carpooling Armenia is now internationalizing. In the course of STF a collaboration between it and an Egyptian entrepreneur was started. “ T H E M O S T A M A Z I N G WA S T H AT I N 2 D AY S M O R E T H A N 6 0 0 0 P E O P L E W E R E I N V O LV E D I N T H E I N I T I AT I V E . I T WA S L I K E A V I R U S . N E A R LY N O O N E WA N T E D T O U S E P U B L I C T R A N S P O RT, B E C A U S E T H E R E WA S B E T T E R O P T I O N . A L L O U R S O C I E T Y WA S I N V O LV E D "
  11. 11. E X A M P L E P R O J E C T S : G I R L S W H O C O D E I N T B I L I S I • JumpStart Georgia noticed that participation to hackathons in Georgia is overwhelmingly male. • It responded by providing office space and encouraging their staff to train young female professionals on writing code. • IT specialists work directly with a group of around 15 women aged 22-35. The women are mostly journalists and activists. They learn to code in the programming language Ruby. “ C O M P U T E R P R O G R A M M I N G [ … ] I S A L S O A N E S S E N T I A L S K I L L F O R I D E A L I S T S I N C O U N T R I E S W H E R E O P E N D ATA A R E S T I L L S C A R C E , A N D W H E R E I N F O R M AT I O N I S E S S E N T I A L I F O N E I S T O U N D E R S TA N D S O C I E T Y A N D W O R K T O M A K E I T B E T T E R . ” Photo: Jumpstart Georgia
  12. 12. S Y S T E M I C C H A L L E N G E S • The challenges mentioned in the data are mostly consistent with MyWorld 2015 survey: environment, education, poverty, migration, un- or underemployment, lack of transparency and corruption in institutions • Almost no mention of protection from crime and violence in STF. • Greater emphasis on urban planning and environmental issues than in MyWorld 2015. MyWorld2015 top 5 choices in the 3 countries Spot The Future
  13. 13. T O P - D O W N A P P R O A C H E S • In their everyday work, changemakers are challenged by bureaucracy, vertical hierarchical systems, top-down approaches. • Problematic relationships with governmental institutions appear in all three countries. • Authorities and donors mistrust grassroots, experimental initiatives. • The traditional grant proposal-grant- project-report is seen as leading to blind fund chasing and no outcome. “ A L L O U R R E Q U E S T S F O R M E E T I N G S A N D F U RT H E R A C T I O N W E R E I G N O R E D . I T ' S T R U E , W E N E V E R I N I T I AT E D A P U B L I C P R O T E S T O R A P E T I T I O N R E G A R D I N G T H E I S S U E , B U T T H AT ' S E X A C T LY W H AT ' S M O S T F R U S T R AT I N G A B O U T C O M M U N I C AT I O N , A S A N O R G A N I Z AT I O N O U R E F F O RT S A L O N E A R E N E V E R E N O U G H . ”
  14. 14. D E A L I N G W I T H T O P - D O W N A P P R O A C H E S • Support each other, sharing human and other resources. • Lobby for more flexible and alternative sources of funding – or try crowdfunding (in Egypt it plugs into religious institutions like zakaa and sadaka). • Break down projects in small chunks and target small, independent donors. • Get training in project management – also informally, by simply sharing experiences.
  15. 15. C O L L A B O R AT I O N I S H A R D • Individuals and organisations trying to affect change perceive each other as competitors. • Duplication of effort is a constant threat. “ W H AT I F I N D L A C K I N G I S P E O P L E TA L K I N G W I T H E A C H O T H E R , N O T J U S T A B O U T E A C H O T H E R . ”
  16. 16. C O L L A B O R AT I O N I S T H E WAY T O G O • “Cooperation” is by far the tag recurring most often. • Appreciation was repeatedly expressed for the “neutral ground” provided by STF workshops. • Bi-weekly meetings started among a group of Georgian participants. • There is a hunger for peer-to-peer collaboration.
  17. 17. F I N D I N G M O T I VAT I O N • Changemakers and activists perceive themselves and their peers as indifferent and skeptical. They report struggling to motivate themselves and others. • This is explained by perceived powerlessness (“I can’t change anything”) and social mistrust (“people are too selfish/ conservative”). • However, most participants are able to motivate themselves into action. Their main motivations are altruism and necessity. “ L E T ' S B U I L D A P L AT F O R M T O D O C U M E N T T H AT I N P U T I N A P U B L I C S PA C E A N D M O N I T O R T H E G R E E N S PA C E T H AT E X I S T S ! I T I S O U R C I T Y. L E T ' S TA K E B A C K O W N E R S H I P O F I T ! ”
  18. 18. V E C T O R S O F C H A N G E PA R T T W O
  19. 19. N E W P L AY E R S I N T H E G A M E • Young changemakers are on the move to achieve positive change. Most of them are newcomers and many fly below the radar of institutions. They are a new agent for change and can be expected to have an impact. • While broadly consistent with post-2015 development goals, their agenda has its own priorities, such as the management of public spaces. We expect to see them rise in the political agenda. • Policy implications: give these newcomers space to take ownership of the issues they care about; refocus tried-and-true approaches towards issues that they don’t.
  20. 20. C O O P E R AT I O N A N D S WA R M I N G • Peer-to-peer cooperation is perceived as the main for their initiatives to grow. They don’t try to scale by recruitment; rather they share resources, mobilising each other on the issues they care about. • We expect to see “swarming” behaviour: almost instant redeployment of manpower and other resources (such as social media traction) from issue to issue, from campaign to campaign. This can be very effective. • Policy implications: provide safe spaces for changemakers to learn to cooperate, also internationally. Avoid zero-sum game setups.
  21. 21. I N T E R FA C I N G W I T H I N S T I T U T I O N S • The traditional grant cycle model is perceived as distorsive and obsolete. Changemakers struggle to fit innovative activities within the frame of hierarchical relationships and administration- oriented approaches. • Policy implications (mitigation): provide training on grant application writing, project management and evaluation. This should allow some initiatives to “fit in” without losing coherence. • Policy implications (radical): test and deploy new forms to support grassroot, innovative initiatives. Ask for help in designing them. We know it’s hard!
  22. 22. D E M O C R AT I C T E C H N O L O G I E S • In their struggle for effective action, young changemakers use a mix of DIY approaches, open source software and open data. Geodata in particular are seen as a tool to convey information and support advocacy on issues from carpooling to harassment. • We expect to see a fast spread of democratic technologies such as open source software, open hardware, DIY, cheap drones. • Policy implications: support and promote open data policies; support and promote all democratic technologies. Try to refrain from hyper-regulating them, or the business models that they enable (eg. Uber-like businesses).
  23. 23. C O N TA C T Edgeryders LBG Find out more at http:// company.edgeryders.eu Or write to alberto@edgeryders.eu Photo credits: Leonid Mujiri (unless otherwise indicated) This work is property of UNDP and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×