Performance comparison of MIPv4 andPerformance comparison of MIPv4 and
MIPv6MIPv6
Presented by:
Md. Habibur Rahman (11-948...
 Introduction
 Mobile IP
• MIPv4
• MIPv6
 Simulation Environment
 Performance Metrics
 Simulation Result
 Conclusion...
Foreign
Agent (FA)
Home Agent
(HA)
Corresponded
Node (CN)
Mobile Node
(MN)
Binding Update
Data Transmission
Home
Network
F...
Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)
Access
Router (AR)
Home Agent
(HA)
Corresponded
Node (CN)
Mobile Node
(MN)
Binding ...
 MIPv4
• integrated in NS2
 MIPv6
• MobiWAN Patch (ns-allinone-2.33)
• Patch Link:
• http://www.nicta.com.au/people/meha...
 Network Simulator –NS2
 Simulation Area 1200X1200
 Simulation Time -200sec
 MAC/80211
 Channel type - Channel/Wirele...
Simulation ParametersSimulation Parameters
Parameters Values
Simulation area 1200 X 1200
Mobile Host (MN) 1
Mobile IP MIPv...
Simulation TopologySimulation Topology
 Drop
• Packet drop is equal to number of packets sent
from source minus number of packet received
in the path of destina...
Packet Type
(Simulation
Time 200
Sec)
Mobile IP Total Sent
packets
Total
Received
packets
Total
dropped
packets
TCP MIPv4 ...
 Simulate MIPv4 and MIPv6 in NS2
 Performance compare by two metrics
 Require more performance analysis
 According to ...
Thank you 
Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6
Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Performace analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

610

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
610
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
24
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Performace analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

  1. 1. Performance comparison of MIPv4 andPerformance comparison of MIPv4 and MIPv6MIPv6 Presented by: Md. Habibur Rahman (11-94853-2) Course: Mobile and Multimedia Network Instructor: Md. Manirul Islam
  2. 2.  Introduction  Mobile IP • MIPv4 • MIPv6  Simulation Environment  Performance Metrics  Simulation Result  Conclusion AgendaAgenda
  3. 3. Foreign Agent (FA) Home Agent (HA) Corresponded Node (CN) Mobile Node (MN) Binding Update Data Transmission Home Network Foreign Network Mobile IPv4 (MIP)Mobile IPv4 (MIP)
  4. 4. Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) Access Router (AR) Home Agent (HA) Corresponded Node (CN) Mobile Node (MN) Binding Update Data Transmission Home Network Foreign Network
  5. 5.  MIPv4 • integrated in NS2  MIPv6 • MobiWAN Patch (ns-allinone-2.33) • Patch Link: • http://www.nicta.com.au/people/mehanio/ns misc Implementation of MIPImplementation of MIP
  6. 6.  Network Simulator –NS2  Simulation Area 1200X1200  Simulation Time -200sec  MAC/80211  Channel type - Channel/Wireless channel  Two Radio propagation model  Data Packet - TCP Simulation EnvironmentSimulation Environment
  7. 7. Simulation ParametersSimulation Parameters Parameters Values Simulation area 1200 X 1200 Mobile Host (MN) 1 Mobile IP MIPv4, MIPv6 Address Type Hierarchical Traffic type TCP Packet size 1040 bytes Simulation time 200s IEEE MAC Layer 802.11 Protocols DSDV Network interface type Phy/wirelessphy
  8. 8. Simulation TopologySimulation Topology
  9. 9.  Drop • Packet drop is equal to number of packets sent from source minus number of packet received in the path of destination i.e.  Throughput • Measurement of number of packets passing through the network in a unit of time. Performance MetricPerformance Metric
  10. 10. Packet Type (Simulation Time 200 Sec) Mobile IP Total Sent packets Total Received packets Total dropped packets TCP MIPv4 1300 1297 3 Mipv6 29692 29692 0 Result AnalysisResult Analysis Packet Type (Simulation Time 200 Sec) Mobile IP Total Sending Throughput (kbps) Total Receiving Throughput (kbps) TCP MIPv4 131220000 129700000 Mipv6 2147483647 2147483647 Throughput Calculation Packet Drop Calculation
  11. 11.  Simulate MIPv4 and MIPv6 in NS2  Performance compare by two metrics  Require more performance analysis  According to our discussion, MIPv6 performs better than MIPv4 ConclusionConclusion
  12. 12. Thank you 
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×