• Like


Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Removido 61 Ikerlan Cfcl Comparison Chart

Uploaded on

Projecto EDEN

Projecto EDEN

More in: Technology , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. CERAMIC FUEL CELL 1 KW System System description: Gas supply max 0.2Nm3/h NG (2kW) Electric power DC 1.24kW AC 1kW Heat recovery up to 500W (depends on coolant temperature) Efficiency (on NG) Electrical 50% net Overall 70% typical Technology Stack Ceramic Fuel Cell (planar, not pressurized, internal steam-reforming) System Ceramic Fuel Cell References (field trials) Powerco, Szencorp and EWE State of art Product development Future market Residential / small commercial up to 20kW Chris Wilcox Business Development Manager CFC Europe Ltd chrisw@cfcl.com.au TECHNICAL ADVICE Technology Advantages: - Large experience - High electrical efficiency (better energy quality) - Steam-reforming before stack (in the case of biogas can work as a fuse in electrical circuits, and protect the stack, the most expensive part of the SOFC system) - quot;non-bindingquot; letter of intent showing the customer (or one of the partners) intends to make a business out of using our units for biogas (or other) applications - Factory in Europe, although they still look for collaboration with other companies Disadvantages: - Planar geometry, worse performance under thermal stresses - Cost per kW high - System development for system up to 5 kW, never over 20kW Experience SOFC systems 4 units delivered to the field (Powerco, Szencorp and EWE), 10 for EWE in 2007 Experience with biogas They can run a known composition through a test station System suitable for demo yes ITEM COST / TIME INCLUDED NOT INCLUDED DELIVERY COST EVALUATION “out-of-pocket” expenses (including travel, accommodation and System 70.000€ living expenses) incurred in providing the Products or Services. Freight rate CFCL will arrange and CFCL will on-charge pay for freight and customs duties and
  • 2. transit insurance to the taxes to Customer Site Insurances Net~Gen system test (without stack) Q3 2007 Delivery Time Stack Q4 2007 Little negotiable (significant percentage up front) Terms of payment Typical (from the total of €140 000): pay around 33% on contract, 33% on hand-over and 34% at the end OPERATION COSTS EVALUATION Start-up yes Monitoring yes Training a technician Insure the Net~Gen unit Operation costs against loss or damage Telephone and e-mail to the value of €70 000 support If the unit fails repeatedly such that it is Repair or replace any not commercially viable part of the NetGen unit for CFCL to continue to which fails to perform Maintenance repair or replace it, both according to the parties will discuss and Technical Specification in good faith attempt to under normal conditions agree an appropriate alternative Additional costs (including delay) due to 1 year support package customer’s delay or Unlimited replacement failure to comply with its Warranty 70.000€ stacks, installation, obligations, or events commissioning and outside the CFCL manuals in spanish Party’s reasonable control After-sales service £500 per day plus taxes (logistics)