• Save
IWRM Evaluation Result_Philippine
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

IWRM Evaluation Result_Philippine






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

IWRM Evaluation Result_Philippine IWRM Evaluation Result_Philippine Presentation Transcript

    Global Water Partnership Southeast Asia
    UN Conference Centre, Bangkok
    September 21, 2011
  • THE
    Prepared by:
    Dr. Jessica Calfoforo Salas
    Philippine Water Partnership
  • Contents
    Summary of Findings
    Way Forward
  • Objectives, methodology, limitations
  • Objective
    To assess IWRM implementation with respect to policy, legal and institutional aspects for years 2000 to 2010.
    Output will be an input to
    Southeast Asia Water Security Roadmapand
    Philippine Water Security Roadmap.
  • Evaluation Framework
  • Methods:
    The Inception Report was circulated for comments and approval.
    Initial data for water resource condition, supplied by PWP members or accessed from their reports and websites comprised the first draft (Part II), was circulated for comments and presented in the first workshop.
    Instruments: a checklist and unstructured interview were used for purposive data gathering to attain the objective of the study. Eighteen (18) cases were reviewed.
    The first draft of Part I was prepared with data from the cases and these were circulated among PWP and discussed in the second workshop.
  • Limitations
    Evaluation design is limited to TOR variables and design provided by the TOR.
    Data needed are assumed to be with PWP members and will be made available by them.
    Since PWP asked for involvement of non-members, only agencies/organizations referred to by PWP members were included.
  • POLICY & PLANS before year 2000
    There were policy statements calling for integrated management of water resources before year 2000:
    Presidential Decree 424, 1974
    The PD created the National Water Resources Board or NWRB. To “Effect inter-sectoral/inter-departmental coordination of water resources plans and programs within the context of national plans and policies for social and economic development…”
    The Water Code of 1976
    “There is a need for a Water Code based on rational concepts of integrated and multi-purpose management of water resources and sufficiently flexible to adequately meet future developments.”
  • Continued
    The First National Water Summit, 1994
    “…urgent need to properly manage the nation’s water in a sustainable manner, and the need for an integration and coordination of all water related efforts towards a more focused approach to water resources management.”
    1980 Water Resources Assessment
    1998 Master Plan for Water Resources Management
    (JICA Study)
    1994 Water Supply and Sanitation Master Plan
    1994-2005 Provincial Master Plans for Water Supply and Sanitation
  • Policy and Plans after year 2000
    2004 Medium Term Development Plan 2004 to 2010
    2004 Clean Water Act
    2005 Adoption of Collaborative Approach to
    Watershed Management by DENR
    2006 IWRM Framework Plan
    2008 Creation of Sub Committee on Water Resources,
    Infrastructure Committee, NEDA
    2009 Climate Change Act
    2010 Philippine Water Supply Sector Roadmap
    2010 National Framework Strategy for Climate Change
    2010 Philippine Development Plan for 2011 to 2016
  • Policy observation
    IWRM has been in the policy since the passing of PD 424 in 1974 and the Philippine Water Code in 1976
    • attention to managing water asa product and the service of ecosystem state and function;
    • decentralized/ local water governance
    Policy agenda:
    • integration of natural systems or the use of ecosystem management tools and processes
    • Local government integration with link to river basin organization
  • Sector Policies
  • Irrigation Sector
    • Issues:
    decreasing water,
    siltation and
    • Policy agenda:
    Collaboration/ integration with the upstream communities
    Integration of natural system through Ecosystem Management
  • Water supply and sanitation
    • The Water Quality Management Area (WQMA) Board of the Clean Water Act provided a platform for integration and coordination.
    Policy Agenda
    • Harmonization with River Basin and Watershed policies.
    • Attention to ecosystem services in supplying water and facilitating sanitation
    • Creating a lead implementing agency and separate economic regulatory body
  • Flood Management
    • Policy Gaps
    Lack of link between flood management plans and water resources plans
    An integrated policy to address flow of water on land and through infrastructures and built-up areas.
    Understanding Environmental Flow using Ecosystem Management and tools
  • River Basin Sector
    • Coordinating and control office established
    • Policy Gap:
    Guideline for organizing watershed of tributaries for local and decentralized water management.
    A mechanism for vertical and horizontal integration.
    Provision for decision support system tools to enable river basin organizations to plan and help local government units.
  • Forest / Upper watershed
    • Policy provides structure for coordination/ integration with communities and local government units.
    • Policy Gaps
    A guideline for utilization of the forest for water storage and water production in addition to production forest and timber plantation
    Use of ecosystem management tools
  • Decentralization
    • Partial devolution of natural resource management helping decentralization of water resource management.
    • Awareness of the impact of climate change and the need to adapt made local government units embrace water resource management and integrate same in their administrative and legislative systems
    • Policy Gap
    Lack of guideline and decision support system tools for effective and efficient IWRM
    Recognition of water resources regions/basin level planning – most plan based on political boundaries
    Local plans (such as land use plans, development plans) not water sensitive
  • Water users’ organization
    • Gap:
    Inadequate institutional, technical and financial capacities
    Weak regulatory framework and implementation
    • Policy Agenda
    Influence in policies can be balanced by integrating consumers’ education and mainstreaming consumers’ concerns.
    Advocacy for a water regulatory commission
    Ecosystem management in water users’ operation can redirect water supply policy and regulation from infrastructure orientation to ecosystem integration and collaboration.
  • water Legislation framework
  • Legislated laws affecting water resources before year 2000
    1963, RA 3601 creation of National Irrigation Administration
    1966, RA 4850, Laguna Lake Development Authority
    1971 RA 6234 Creation of Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System
    1990, RA 7160. The Local Government Code
    1995 RA 8041 The National Water Crisis Act
    1997 Agriculture and Fishery Modernization Act
    Electrical Power Industry Reform Act
    1987 The Philippine Constitution
  • Legislated laws affecting water resources after year 2000
    2001 RA 9147. Wildlife Resources and Conservation Act.
    2004 RA 9275 The Clean Water Act
    2009 R.A. 9729. Climate Change Act
  • Elements of an Integrated Water Legislation Framework (GWP INBO)
    National, provincial and local water laws and policies determine how stakeholders play their respective roles in the development and management of water resources.
    Basin organizations put up by law have a strong mandate
    Laws and water policies spell out rules, responsibility and accountability of public and private sectors
  • Continued
    4. Water management framework should e part of an existing national administrative system
    5. Basin and national water policy management plans should be harmonized.
    All items were rated by PWP members as implemented “to a little extent.”
  • Institutional framework
  • Figure 10
    Emerging Pattern of Institutional Integration
  • Emerging patterns
    • Three separate initiatives for integration coming from:
    • National level with NWRB and NEDA sub committee on water
    • Mezzo level with river basin organizations
    • Local governments with community watershed organizations
    • Vertical integration is taking two paths
    • River basin organizations under RBCO with NEDA sub committee on water to NWRB
    • Watersheds outside river basins are integrated through local government units to the Regional Development Councils to RBCO to NWRB through NEDA sub committee on water
    • Horizontal integration
    • National agencies with NEDA sub committee on water
    • 20 river basin organizations with RBCO
    • RBOs and RDCs
    • Islands consortium
    • Provinces integrating watershed organizations.
  • Impeding factors in the implementation of IWRM
    Inadequate and/or undefined mechanisms for coordination.
    Unresolved issues for restructuring central level water authority. Capacity to provide the required leadership and support for IWRM implementation.
    Water sector policies do not have mechanisms for coordination with other sectors (no lateral nodes for integration, except the Clean Water Act)
  • 5. Inadequate studies and decision-support systems
    6. Not engaging the education sector for research and outreach.
    7. Not enough public awareness
    8. Inadequate understanding of the depth of issues of water resources particularly at the ecosystems level (natural systems integration).
    9. Lack of recognition and encouragement for existing effort in other water resources management levels
  • Way Forward
  • The following maybe considered in policy reviews:
    Provision for a specific sector mechanism for coordination,
    Attention to watershedsor catchments below 1,000 km2 which is the area for river basin classification and provide coordinating guidelines for areas outside the 20 major river basins.
    Establish a guideline for LGUs in the integration of water management in its administrative system.
    Provide quality information and scientific decision support systems for policy formulation.
  • Gaps at the national level coordination may be addressed by high level directives providing for:
    Multi-stakeholders participation
    Use of timely and quality and science-based information
    Conflict resolution mechanisms
    Technical/ scientific input
  • Work towards the economic regulation of water
    Increase awareness , appreciation and education towards ecosystem services
    Concept development of WRM units as nodes of integration and their operationalization.
    Knowledge sharing platforms including collegial learning among the 20 organized river basin management units in the country and other water management bodies
    Need for specific guidelines for vertical and horizontal integration at river basins/ watersheds
  • End
    For feedback and questions, email