• Save
First Robotics Manipulator Design
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

First Robotics Manipulator Design

on

  • 2,903 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,903
Views on SlideShare
2,897
Embed Views
6

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 6

http://www.slideshare.net 6

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

First Robotics Manipulator Design First Robotics Manipulator Design Presentation Transcript

  • Brad Mello
    FIRST “Rack N’ Roll” Manipulator Design
  • Challenge
    The challenge of the 2007-2008 FIRST Robotics Competition game “Rack N’ Roll” was to score inflated inner tubes on posts sticking out from a rack in the middle of the field.
  • Problem
    Tubes could only be placed on the rack at a certain angle, or else they would fall off.
    The flat plate on the front of each post prevented tubes from falling off once placed, but made it harder to place them as well.
  • Solution
    • Design ideas included pinching mechanisms and pneumatic grippers
    • Many were flawed early on
    • My design would allow tubes to be oriented at any angle
  • My Idea
    The other design ideas focused around gripping the inner tube, which would usually be picked up from the floor.
    Tubes would be picked up horizontally, and needed to be placed vertically on the rack.
    The top and bottom tracks of wheels of my design would be able to be controlled independently.
    This would allow for the tubes to be rotated inside the gripper by running the top track and bottom track opposite each other, making picking up horizontally and placing vertically simple.
  • Prototyping
    The next step in our design process was to prototype ideas using basic materials.
    We used VEX materials to make a functioning prototype of my idea.
  • Pros
    Once inside the gripper, the tubes could be rotated as planned.
    Intake of tubes was smooth.
    Tubes did not change angle as they exited the gripper .
  • Cons
    Little contact surface area between tube and gripper.
    If jostled, the tube would fall and hang vertically from the gripper.
    VEX motors couldn’t demonstrate rotation of tubes well .
  • Next Step
    Prototype revisions were made
    Using alternative materials to contact tube
    Non-slip padding was attempted, but the padding would walk off of the rollers and we encountered many problems
  • Next Step (continued)
    Polyurethane Polycord® proved to have a high coefficient of friction on the inner tube.
    This thin belting would be able to run parallel with the tube, effectively keeping hold of the tube inside the gripper
    I made a prototype using this material along with a PVC plastic skeleton frame.
  • Power
    Car window motors were chosen to power polycord belts.
    Tubes could be precisely angled inside this new gripper
    Difficult to knock free
    Polycord was able to compress as tubes were brought in
  • Final Prototype
    This design was chosen by the team to be implemented into our final robot design.
  • Evolution
    • A welded aluminum version of my design came next
    • Lightweight
    • Robust
    • A tube was able to slightly compress the polycord
    • Added friction between tube and gripper
  • Controls
    Joystick control of gripper
    Up and Down on joystick picked up and shot out tubes
    Left and Right on joystick rotated the tube inside the gripper
  • Benefits to Playing Style
    The best way to score on the rack was to have the tube at a 45 degree angle.
    This angle was best to avoid to small rubber house sticking
    The manipulator was able to rotate the tube to this angle no matter the position of the rest of the arm.
  • Playing Style (continued)
    Tubes could be scored at any of the three different post heights, and our gripper was able to adjust the angle of the tubes effectively at all three of these heights.
  • Positioning of the Tube
    The prime position for rotation of the tube was in the direct center of the gripper
    Problem: Difficult for drivers to determine exactly where tube sat in gripper during game play.
  • Solution
    A VEX bump sensor was added to very back of the gripper
    Program was written to override operator controls for a fraction of a second when bump sensor was touched (when tube was fully sucked in)
    The tube was backed out approximately two inches during this time to position it back in the center of the gripper
  • Competition
    • Predictions about game play were correct
    • Most tubes were picked up from ground level
    • Angle of tubes needed to be adjusted often and with haste
  • Review
    This is a video demonstrating our robot rotating an inner tube inside of its gripper.
    Click image to play video
  • 121 Rhodewarriors