The Ellipse Model In Related To Fuzzy Logic
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

The Ellipse Model In Related To Fuzzy Logic

on

  • 761 views

a new approach in modeling

a new approach in modeling

Statistics

Views

Total Views
761
Views on SlideShare
761
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    The Ellipse Model In Related To Fuzzy Logic The Ellipse Model In Related To Fuzzy Logic Document Transcript

    • The ellipse model in related to fuzzy logic a parabola equation x square= 4cy and y square= 4cx If we add two parabola together, we create a pseudo ellipse from x square + y square = 4 c (x+y); Assumed that x+ y = c (if we calculated it from Bayesian linear equation), we rearrange the pseudo ellipse to be as (x square/ 4) + (y square / 4) = c square. Fuzzy logic is disproportionate by itself. If we find another pseudo ellipse from an interrogated paradigm of (x square /4) + (y square / 4) = C square. Then, we calculate the crossing intersection of ( a , b ) from c = x + y and C = x + y. The real ellipse will be (x square / a square) + (y square / b square) = (c square). It means that if we add two hypothetical theories together such as 'the substantial facts vs the question of law' and 'the less errors in legal procedure vs the reality of evident', we will get a better prediction in decision making from informatics by computerized pattern recognition. A wild card in informatics, science, and law The following is my idea to build rubric in order to sort out needed data from legal resources. My rubric is to set up A as agent (the judicial systems), C as congress, T as trade (enterprises), G as government, U as people (like us), S as sub chapter s- corp, B as sub chapter c-corp, K as sub chapter partnership etc. The second step is to write computer programs for data mining and computer algorithm in informatics and then extract those assigned codes such as A,C,T,G,U,S,B,K etc from considered judicial database, and create some linked codes such as 'hashfljksafhhsahalhahg' . XML is to markup those extracted codes 'hashfljksafhhsahalhahg' in the linked syllables for computer to read and store those syllables, just like we read English sentences to our memory. After that, computer will run neural networking, Bayesian linear equation and Fuzzy logic. The third step, XML may be able to interpret those linked codes 'hashfljksafhhsahalhahg' and write certain English sentences under their decision making. Here, XML can use human English pattern such as the pattern of 'Subject + Verb + Object' and also indirect sentence 'Object + (is/was/are) + verb transitive( past participle ) + Subject'. For example, Tom grabs a piece of paper. XML mark Tom as Subject, grab as Verb, and paper as Object. XML reversely flips back to write 'A piece of paper is grabbed by Tom.' The reason is that the pointer of browser's icon will flip back to the original place when they write an indirect sentence. At this moment, computer will ask us for feedback, then we give computer some input to decide 'do it' or 'not do it'. The interactive relationship between machine and human is built here. Concerning some question of Bayesian application in legal mental calculus. I have written essay of Bayesian application in informatics, but it is not in legal mind
    • setting. If we think that our metal calculus is also following rubric in our brain, then Bayesian linear equation has its reason in pattern recognition because it is linear as well as it is following the arm's length rule in Law. . I like to answer another question about hypothesis of substantial facts vs less error in legal procedure. For example, we treat an ellipse as a water melon, and we use two knifes from two Bayesian linear equations, and we cut water melon into different slices. We take a slice of intersection of points of (a,b) where C and c are very closed. It meant that the lowest error percentage from legal procedure is to mirror and match the substantial facts of real evident. We might know that a wild card meant every thing in a poker game. Informatics might have a wild card such as gap (empty space) in genetic codes alignment. Two sequences are arrayed in parallel from their fixed positions in query on browser. But if we move one array of linked syllables back or forth along fixed linked syllables to find the best score of rubric matching, we might already create some gaps in between those two overlapped sequences. Pointers in Unix systems will trigger 'do it' or 'not do it' choice, and decision making under Bayesian posterior adjustment or XML Socrates questions will feed empty spaces with pointers for an alternative decision making choice instead of only (0, 1) as it is in the binary system, and the event driven of pointer will function as a wild card launcher that pointer will mirror sequences better and create a real ellipse model from the substantial facts such as forensic DNA finger print vs the subject matters of stature in Law. Rubrics database and syllables database are used to extract codes such as 'hashfljksafhhsahalhahg' for computational operations and reasons/decision performance in neural networking, and XML database are used as tools to bring the pointers of operating systems back to the original place where neural networking was previously running. For example, a judicial decision is based on the initiative of intention from a suspect, and the testimony from three parties' debating is narrowed down to the subject matter of Law where stature is bound. If a judge owns those three databases-rubric, syllables, XML, combined with Bayesian linear equation of posterior adjustment to those two informatics systems such as neural networking, and Fuzzy logic, she/he will bring the whole issue back to where it was actually happening in the disputed case. Then, judge will assign stature in different possibilities under her/his professional trainings to those XML questions 'do it' or 'not do it' and figures out the best possibilities in solutions under Fuzzy logic with ellipse modeling. My understanding of Bayesian linear equation is purposely for posterior adjustment, and XML is also purposely to bring pointers back to the subject matter of Law by Socrates questions. The graphic applications in informatics are embedded in the operations from pointers but we may only see one pointer and it is the icon that brinks on browser. Pointers are mathematically operated and computation maximum/minimum, algorithm programed, networks linked and connected to those linked syllables 'hashfljksafhhsahalhahg' in graphic applications, and I use twenty six machine symbols for them such as (!@#$%^&*()<>?:"{}[[]|,./-~` etc ). In addition, those approaches from two hypothesis from 'the substantial of facts in characters' and 'the less errors in legal procedure in related to the subject matter of Law' is purposely by using
    • Bayesian linear equation to minimize errors from the posterior adjustment in order to meet the green rule in mathematics in ellipse modeling. For example, just like that if you cut water melon to slices by two knifes, the thin slice is done by holding two knifes in parallel and making a narrow cut. A Benzene Ring Dynamic Modeling Using in brain reasoning as analogy as F# in Music A wild card operated in Benzene Ring Dynamic Modeling will be functioning as analogy as installing a gap in DNA sequence alignment. It might mean that Benzene Ring Dynamic Modeling is also reasonable if a wild card is applied in other rubric setting such as F# in music. The whole concept of a wild card use might create certain fundamental and dynamical mechanisms and that kind of option acts as it is in human brain reasoning & thinking for the best performance. A wild card in Benzene Ring Dynamic Model might function as 'do it' or 'not do it' in decision making that we are already familiar in neural networking by using Bayesian linear equation in DNA sequences for posterior adjustment and XML of Socrates questions in the ellipse modeling. Benzene Ring Dynamic Modeling in informatics This modeling is to apply a new dynamic modeling in order to match two series of DNA sequences or some other linked codes that we use the benzene ring dynamic modeling instead of using an existed molecular dynamic model for the purpose of DNA sequence alignment. Benzene ring dynamic modeling in music A B C D E F# G or A B C D E F Gb ( ) closed-up In Benzene Ring Dynamic Modeling, if a wild card is functioning as interface and vehicle in our brain reasoning, we might assumed that the wild card is note F# in Music. It might mean that Benzene ring dynamic modeling is reasonable for use if it is applied in music rubrics. The whole concept for wild card use might create fundamental and dynamical applications as analogy as our brain reasoning. A wild card such as F# or Gb will be used in benzene ring dynamic model that might function as 'do it' or 'not do it' decision making in the ellipse modeling. Musical rubric is
    • A B C D E F# G or A B C D E F Gb Benzene Ring Dynamic Model in informatics