• Like
Howard Back,Ppt
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Published

 

Published in Business , Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
417
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Freedom of Information Act, 2000 Lessons learned from implementing the Act in the London Metropolitan Police – a high profile U.K. Public Authority Presentation to the international seminar in Santiago, Chile Howard Back 5/6 November 2007
  • 2. My role in Freedom of Information
    • London Metropolitan Police project team September 2002 until April 2005
    • Extensive learning from Queensland Police, Australia
    • Visit to/regular contact with Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington DC, USA
    • Seen by 42 other UK Police Forces as a lead player
    • [email_address]
  • 3. Objectives of presentation
    • Consider what lessons were learned from the London experience
    • Recognise the implications for Chilean organisations
    • Use the lessons learned to improve planning for implementing the law in Chile
  • 4. Freedom of Information Act, 2000
    • Threat or opportunity?
  • 5. The implications of FOIA
    • Policy, systems, processes
    • Training and awareness
    • Culture of openness and accountability
      • Senior management
      • Front line staff
      • Willingness to release new information
      • The view from the public
    • Information management improvements
  • 6. What size is the Metropolitan Police?
    • 31,000 police officers
    • 17,000 civilian support staff
    • Budget of £2.9 billion
  • 7. Different formats of information
    • Paper records – a huge legacy
    • Electronic Word documents and spreadsheets
    • Email communication and decision making
    • Video tapes
    • Audio tapes
    • Photographs
    • Maps and plans
  • 8. FBI experience of FOIA
    • Comparison with a similar high profile law enforcement agency:
    • History of being unprepared for the onslaught of requests
    • Experience of the threat of ‘Mosaic Requests’
    • File based culture
    • Acceptance that records will be exposed
  • 9. How did the Metro Police project team model the response?
    • Scale and geography of the organisation
    • Risks/threats
    • Central processing office and local decision makers
    • Existing Data Protection requests
    • Staffing constraints
    • Local ownership of information
  • 10. What was the anticipated impact on the Metro Police?
    • Information Commissioner would publicise the right
    • Significant numbers of e-mail applications anticipated
    • Applications from media, politicians, criminals, local pressure groups and staff
    • Focus would be on policy, procedure, decision making and resource deployment
    • Significant past events will attract applications
  • 11. How is it working in the Metro Police now?
    • Simple requests managed locally
      • No issues on disclosure
      • Application of simple exemptions
    • Complex requests managed centrally (Public Access Office)
      • Public interest exemptions
      • Co-ordination required
      • Structure of Single Points of Contact in higher ‘risk’ Dept’s
      • National co-ordination of pan-UK police forces
  • 12. Resource cost
    • Staffing – 850 potential decision makers, 38 processors in the central Public Access Office
    • MetRIC – a case management system which cost £1.3m
    • Training – 5 levels – one size does NOT fit all
  • 13. What are the Metro Police being asked for?
    • Focus on personal information, personnel matters and deployments / resources
    • Internal requests
    • Growing media usage
    • Considerable internal co-ordination needed
    • Hot news issues – this is event- driven
    • Top ten requested documents include the Diversity Strategy, minutes of local police station senior management team meetings and the expenses paid to the Commissioner and his Management Board colleagues!!
  • 14. FOIA activity currently
    • 3084 FOIA requests in 2006
    • Monthly Publication Scheme activity:
    • 16,190 hits monthly on the Publication Scheme
    • 95,700 monthly downloads
    • Significant rise in Data Protection requests
  • 15. The Metro Police’s system to manage requests
    • MetRIC – Metropolitan Requests for Information and Correspondence
    • Central co-ordination – access across the Metro Police
    • Software solution to capture and track all requests
    • Audit trail of all disclosures and decision making
  • 16.  
  • 17.  
  • 18.  
  • 19.  
  • 20. The Metro Police Publication Scheme – used to reduce requests
    • Catalogue of information available to the public
    • Emphasis on new material of public interest
    • Proactive publication of material
      • Minutes
      • Policies
      • Performance
      • Plans, Objectives, Strategies
    • MPS model follows national model for police forces
    • Currently 12,900 documents published for world wide access
  • 21. Lessons learned (1)
    • Culture change is led from the top
    • Publish NOW as much as you dare
    • Work closely with high risk departments and establish control points
    • Use as many exemptions as possible to protect high risk information
    • If one exemption fails, have alternatives ready
    • Invest in training for decision makers
    • Train to various levels based on need
  • 22. Lessons learned (2)
    • Maintain contact with the applicant at all stages of the request
    • “Do you want it all or do you want it quickly?”
    • Think like an applicant
    • Once an applicant has possession of information, all control of it is lost
    • FOI is event driven – an incident given local/national/international media coverage will increase requests
  • 23. Lessons learned (3)
    • Use technology if possible to manage requests:
    • Look for patterns of requests and regular applicants
    • Full audit trail of decision making
    • Up to date tracking of all requests
    • Analysis of bottle necks to improve performance
    • Publish information on the internet once released to an applicant
  • 24. Lessons learned (4)
    • One and only opportunity to improve information management (not seen as important):
    • Reduce volumes of information, improve indexing, increase staff efficiency, improve staff knowledge, reduce costs, improve professionalism and reputation
    • Use the change in law to change the culture and reputation – openness, accountability, honesty, willingness to release information
  • 25. If FOIA is coming to you, do this…
    • Prepare for requests
      • Identify the types of information that will attract requests
      • Examine the exemptions under FOIA
      • Consider how you would apply them
    • Proactively publish documents of ‘Public Interest’
  • 26. General issues in the Metro Police’s law enforcement arena
    • FOIA relates to information held, not owned
    • Applicant blind
    • Threat of mosaic approaches
    • Interpretation of Public Interest Test
    • However the big issue is……………..
  • 27. The issue of co-ordination
    • Pan-Department
    • Pan-London
    • National
    • International
    • Remember different FOIA legislation and use of exemptions in UK, USA, Canada and other countries subject to this legislation
  • 28. If FOIA is coming to a range of organisations at the same time…
    • Make a request for one agency’s information from another one – where is the weakest link in the chain nationally/internationally?
    • Will each agency deal with its own requests or is there a central clearing house?
    • What protocols will govern decision-making on disclosure / withholding of information?
  • 29. Multi-agency co-operation
    • Joint activity now to
      • Assess the risks
      • Identify sensitive information
      • Apply exemptions/agree publication now
      • Agree co-ordination
      • Think like an applicant
      • How is your organisation set up to respond?
  • 30.  
  • 31.