Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Cramptontwisa2009a
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Cramptontwisa2009a

261
views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
261
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • First 2 from reflective essays …… last one is from comment on official evalution
  • Transcript

    • 1. Sakai and its application to teaching forensic science across geography, time, profession and generation divides.
      Dr. Andrea Crampton
      Charles Sturt University
      Australia
    • 2.
    • 3. How to use Sakai and contemporary pedagogy to construct an industry relevant dynamic learning environment.
    • 4. FSC 200- Introduction to Forensic Science
      Courses Served
      BMedSc/BForensicBiotech; Bachelor of Policing; BMedSci/BBiotech(Med-App); BPolicing(Investigations); BSc; Bachelor of Arts; BForensicBiotech
      Enrolments
      2007 : 37 ;7 Internal (AV age 19.5), 30 Distance (AV age 31.7)
      2008 : 27 all distance
    • 5. My Aim
      Utilise the knowledge and skills of the experienced students in the class
      Maximise student exposure to different ways in which the same information is viewed by those with a different background and with different career aspirations within the field
      Promote the development of key teamwork skills
      Encourage deeper learning
    • 6. Pedagogical Approach
      Constructionists
      Guide on the side, student centred, active learning
    • 7. Content Delivery
      Text book – Jackson and Jackson : Forensic Science.
      Lectures – live and virtual
      Podcasts – Interviews with industry members
      Wiki –News, tutorials and class records (fingerprint patterns)
      All hosted on CSU version of Sakai called Interact
    • 8. FSC 200 – Sakai Site
    • 9. Tool + Aim
      Scenario driven group assessment
      9 teams of 4-5 students
      Each team own Interact Site
      Each team member given a role – “scripting”
      FOA, SOCO, Lab Tech, Lab Manager
    • 10. The Scenario
      Assessment 1 – Define role
      Scenario given to FOA
      Assessment 2- Action within role and communication with group
      Break in Case -2nd scene/suspect
      Roles suspended, one team
      Group forensic report written as wiki
    • 11.
    • 12. A 2008 Group Page
    • 13. How The Tools Were Actually Used
      Chat
      736 messages in 3 months
      Asynchronous and Synchronous
      7/9 groups at least 1 synchronous session
      36 hr 38 mins synchronous
      76% 8am-5pm
    • 14. Asynchronous
      Distance – 24 messages/ student
      Internal – 13 messages/student
    • 15. Group Forensic Report
      Wiki
      Tech Savy
      Tech proficient
      Tech phobic
    • 16. I loved it, but what about the students?
      Evaluation, use and perceptions
      Reflective essay as last assessment item
      Official evaluations
      Comments made in chat or sent via email
    • 17. Official Evaluations
    • 18. Interact In Their Words!
      ST1 “having the opportunity to see the benefits of Interact such as easy access to class material and the feeling of actually having constant lecturer support through the use of the announcements and results of section was a great learning experience which will hopefully be useful in the years to come.”
       
      ST2 ”it gave direct and personal contact via the forums (chat room) to both your group participants and lecture, which I found terrific. As a group the three of us could converse directly to learn from what others were addressing in the group chat room and post our concerns. So for me it was a great Condit to other students both on-campus and DE.”
      EV1 Interact was fantastic. It was so easy to use (once you knew how) and it was so easy to communicate with fellow students and academic staff. It made life a lot easier.
    • 19. The Scenario/Constructionist Approach
      ST3“Another advantage of doing this activity as a group is that by interaction with other students in the subject we were able to gain a greater understanding of the area forensics. …. By working with students who are already involved in the area we were able to learn things that they knew and apply them to our investigation”
       
      ST4“Group work is an effective means of learning especially for those times when I found myself clueless. As forensic scientists interact with the police force and the legal Court of Justice’s group work gave me an inside of the real world it gave me an opportunity to learn how to adjust and respect individual differences. The activity was indeed fun and educational and are very good interactive tool for learning forensic science.” 
      ST5” this group activity has taught me a great deal about both working in a forensic team and in a team in general. And then how much a forensic investigation relies on teamwork and trust between its members that everyone will adequate play their part. Is not only applies in a forensic team but any team. I also learned how to manage my time effectively when trying to fit in with four other people. Is important for me to have my work in on time as the others in the group relying on my work to allow them to do theirs”
    • 20. Summary: Evaluation Rubric
      Communication and collaboration
      30% of student assessment required ongoing communication and collaboration.
      Students were given the opportunity to reflect on their actions when the group came together and peer learning and feedback was encouraged.
    • 21. Summary: Evaluation Rubric
      Learning Material
      Subject outline was provided in print and online and include a table showing which role had to do what when.
      Virtual tutorial using screen capture was created to guide students in how to set up and contribute to a wiki.
    • 22.  
    • 23. Summary: Evaluation Rubric
      Learning outcomes and assessment
      Student – faculty contact
      Chat in teams and general page
      Phone and email
      Encourages cooperation among students
      Team work based
      Facilitated peer learning
      Each student had level of responsibility to other students
      Encourages active learning
      Enabled students to connect theory with practice and discussion different views on choice of actions
      Prompt feedback
      From team members on regular basis and as part of formal procedures
      From lecturer in response to emailed questions as well as the lecturer joining team chat sessions
    • 24. Summary: Evaluation Rubric
      Learning outcomes and assessment
      Emphasizes time on task
      Needed to meet deadlines to ensure other team members could do their work
      Time allocated was proportional to value of the task
      Incorporation of life experiences and prior knowledge was facilitate for the benefit of the individual and their team.
      Communication of high expectations
      It was actually the student’s own drive to not let the team down that created an environment of high expectations
      Quality of work produced exceeded lecturer expectations
      Respect diverse talents and ways of learning
      Content was provided as both text and audio
      Encouraging peer learning gave all opportunity to demonstrate their strengths and use them for the benefit of others.
      Teams with mixed backgrounds ensured all experienced what different talents could bring to a project
    • 25. Summary: Evaluation Rubric
      Course look and feel and web usability
      Consistency in tool use and presentation in both general page and team pages.
      Tool bars and tables of content linking wiki pages were used to promote easy access to all areas.
    • 26. Summary: Evaluation Rubric
      Learner support
      The instructor was available on a daily basis by email or phone
      Institutional tech support was available 24 hours a day 7 days a week
      Regular visits to each team site enabled identification of issues and potential problems early and thus facilitate introduction of preventive measure.
    • 27. But Did It Work
      ST6 ”I felt that due to my previous involvement in criminal investigations and court procedures I was able to contribute heavily in this respect. I was however surprised that I was so willing to spend time and effort to share my knowledge with the group. Hopefully this interaction has assisted in the overall learning effort of the team. “
    • 28. Acknowledgements
      Assoc Prof. Lyn Angel and Dr. Heather Cavanagh
      CSU technical support and Interact pilot trial team
      Prof. Ross Chambers and Dr. John Harper
      Members of the School of Biomedical Sciences and School of Humanities and Social Sciences
      The Students of FSC 200