Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Presentation On Sections
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.


Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Presentation On Sections



  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Title
    Try to give your research a tile that describes
    what you were investigating.
    ‘An investigation into the effect of chunking on
    ‘An investigation into the effect of category headings on recall.’
  • 2. Abstract
    A summary of your general aims, method,
    participants, results and conclusions.
    Write it last – you won’t know your conclusions until you have finished your experiments and analysed your results.
    This should only be one paragraph long.
  • 3. Introduction
    This section explains the theoretical setting for
    your work and the reasons for your choice of
    method. You should include
    Background to the general area of study – memory, Atkinson and Shiffrins model
    Previous research carried out in your particular area – context dependent, imagery etc
    How your investigation relates to the previous research i.e. What are you doing differently?
  • 4. Mark allocation
    Introduction 1 – inclusion of relevant theory
    No background evidence is presented. (0)
    Anecdotal evidence is presented as background
    to the investigation. (1-2)
    The introduction contains some appropriate
    psychological concepts, theories and/or
    terminology. (3-4)
    Relevant psychological concepts, theories and terminology are presented clearly. (5-6)
  • 5. Introduction
    Subheadings of
    Aim – ‘My aim was.......’
    Hypothesis – ‘The experimental hypothesis is ...’
    ‘The null hypothesis is........’
    ‘The independent variable is......’
    ‘The dependent variable is......’
  • 6. Mark allocation
    Introduction 2 – aims and hypothesis
    No statement of the aim or hypothesis of the investigation. (0)
    A statement of the aim or hypothesis is given. (1)
    Statement of aim and hypothesis is given. (2)
    A clear concise aim and hypothesis are stated, and are related to the psychology presented in the introduction. (3)
  • 7. Method
    This section should be divided into the following
    Design – state the type of investigation (lab experiment, quasi experiment, observation, questionnaire) what design you used for this (independent measures, repeated measures, matched pairs) and say why.
  • 8. Method
    Participants – state the type of sampling method used and why and also the details of your participants including how many there were, age range, gender, and occupation (students)
  • 9. Method
    Materials – list the materials that you used including a stopwatch , word lists, instructions etc.
    Also describe why you used the words or pictures on your lists.
    Put a copy of your lists, instructions, consent
    form and debrief statement at the back of your
    report as appendices
  • 10. Method
    Procedure – Describe how you conducted your experiment. Use the past tense eg. ‘I gave out’ or ‘I asked the participants’.
    Say where the experiment took place and the time of day.
    Say how you scored your results eg. Gave 1 point for each word correctly recalled.
    It may help to use numbered bullet points to show what you did at each step of the experiment.
  • 11. Mark allocation
    Method 1 – use of appropriate psychological methods
    Nature of the investigation is not clear. (0)
    Nature of the investigation is evident from the report. (1)
    Attempts made to state design of investigation and to identify some of the procedures and factors involved in setting up the investigation. (2)
    Design correct. Attempts made to justify it. Section written up correctly identifying procedures, participants, variables, controls. Not enough detail given for method to be capable of replication (3-4)
    Design correct and justified. Enough details given for method to be capable of replication. (5-6)
  • 12. Method
    Procedure cont –
    Write this section so that someone reading it could repeat exactly what you did.
    Describe any ethical considerations that you had to make.
  • 13. Mark allocation
    Method 2 – Ethical collection of information
    No application of ethical issues in methodology (0)
    Candidate demonstrates an awareness of ethical issues in the research (1)
    candidate demonstrates an awareness of ethical issues and explains what ethical considerations have been applied. (2)
    Candidate demonstrates an awareness of ethical issues by explaining in detail how they have been correctly applied to the investigation. (3)
  • 14. Results
    Present these as visually as possible, but also
    describe the data you obtained.
    Label your tables and graphs clearly.
    Measures of central tendency such as means,
    medians, or modes are also useful to show the
    direction of your results.
    Explain what your results mean in the context of
    your hypothesis. Eg. ‘these results support my experiment hypothesis.....’
  • 15. Mark allocation
    Results – organised presentation of data
    No findings have been recorded. (0)
    Data has been collected and the findings are presented with some degree of clarity. (1-2)
    Appropriate descriptive statistics such as means, medians, modes and ranges, graphs and/or tables have been used to summarise the data. (3-4)
    Appropriate descriptive statistics, graphs and/or tables have been used to summarise the data. There is brief statement which highlights the main findings. (5-6)
    Data is presented logically in appropriate graphs and/or tables. The findings are well summarised and the main conclusions are clearly evident from the analyses provided. There is a statement which highlights the main findings and which clearly links them to the aims/hypothesis of the investigation. (7-8)
  • 16. Discussion
    In this section the following questions should be considered:
    What do the results mean?
    How do the results relate to the aim and/or the hypothesis?
    How do the results relate to the theory that was described in the introduction?
    Do the results agree with, or challenge, the theory in any way?
  • 17. Discussion
    What modifications, if any, can be suggested to the theory in the light of this study?
    What criticisms, if any, can be made of the method that was used?
    choice of design?
    choice of sample?
    choice of materials?
    choice of procedure?
    choice of location?
    choice of controls?
  • 18. Discussion
    If the method had been improved in some way, how would this have affected the results?
    Were there any confounding variables?
    Were there any ethical issues raise during the study?
    Suggestions for further research?
  • 19. Mark allocation
    Discussion 1 – drawing inferences from results
    No discussion of the findings. (0)
    Candidate is able to extract one appropriate conclusion from the reported results. (1)
    Candidate can draw inferences from the data, and is able to relate one of these to the aims, hypotheses or background theory. (2-3)
    Candidate can draw inferences from the data, and is able to show how these relate to both the aims/hypotheses of the investigation and to the background theory. (4-5)
  • 20. Mark allocation
    Discussion 2 – recognition of bias and limitations of the
    No reference is made to bias or limitations of the investigation, or to any improvements. (0)
    Reference is made to one limitation or source of bias in the investigation or to any possible improvements. (1-2)
    Candidate recognises bias in the information collected and provides an explanation of the way in which this may have affected the results. Suggestions for improvements to the investigation are provided. (3-4)
  • 21. Mark allocation
    Presentation of report and quality of written communication
    The report shows no organisation. Poor spelling and a limited range of appropriate technical terms are used. (0-1)
    Candidate has used appropriate sections within the report. Language is clear, with attempts to distinguish relevant material and to assemble a limited argument. Specialist language is used correctly. (2-3)
    The candidate has used the sections of the report appropriately. There is good quality of expression throughout, with all specialist terms used with a high degree of precision. Very clear written expression. (4-5)
  • 22. Deadlines
    Friday will be the last chance to work on your
    coursework in class.
    1st draft is due on Monday 26th Jan (next
    Marked 1st draft will be returned by 12th February
    Final hand in date is Monday 2nd March