Princeton 2 Inside The Admission Office April 07

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    2 Favorites

    Princeton 2 Inside The Admission Office April 07 - Presentation Transcript

    1. Inside the Admission Office: How Colleges Decide Who to Admit Don Betterton Betterton College Planning [email_address]
    2. Types of Colleges (4200 total)
      • In the U.S. there is a higher education opportunity for every level of
      • student interest and ability. My categories:
      • Register and attend (1900)
      • Routine enrollment process
      • Specialty schools (300)
      • Admit on interest and talent
      • Meet basic standards (1500)
        • Admit more than 75% of applicants
      • Competitive (400)
        • Admit from 40% to 75% of applicants
      • Selective (100)
        • Admit fewer than 40% of applicants
    3. Competitive and Selective
      • 5-year grad rate:
        • 50% or more for publics
        • 80% or more for privates
      • 50% or more of freshmen have SAT over 1200,
      • ACT over 24
      • 3.5 average high school GPA
      • 1/3 or more from top 10% of h.s. class
    4. Competitive and Selective
      • Although these colleges make up only about
      • 25% of the 4-yr non-profit, much of the college-going
      • preparation and pressure is focused here.
      • They are the types of colleges where good admission planning is needed.
      • They tend to be more expensive and information about how to pay, with or without aid, is important.
    5. Admission Recruiting Methods Create Unrealistic Expectations
      • It is hard to judge where a student stands because top colleges send We Want You messages even knowing full well they will only admit some of the students they encourage to apply.
      • This is an unusual buyer (student) seller (college) relationship.
    6. What Would Wal-Mart Do If it Behaved Like a Top College?
      • Wal-Mart would mount an extensive advertising campaign that included:
        • Print ads (college catalog)
        • Internet ads (college Web site)
        • Send salesmen on the road (admission staff)
        • Invite potential buyers to tour the store (campus visits)
        • Have previous buyers seek out new customers (alumni recruiters)
        • Mount a large direct mail campaign (search lists)
        • Use techniques to get a better product review in Consumer Reports-style publications (U.S. News ratings)
    7. What Next?
      • Wal-Mart’s outreach methods succeed at generating a very high demand for its product.
      • But,
        • It turns out that all along Wal-Mart only had enough product to sell to 1/3 of potential buyers.
        • Not only that, but Wal-Mart will decide who will be allowed to make a purchase. Roles are reversed. Wal-Mart becomes the buyer. The customer must now submit an application to “sell himself.”
    8. And Next …
      • Excited by all the Wal-Mart advertising, the potential customer wants to judge how he compares to others who are also interested in being selected, and asks,
        • “What criteria do you use to choose those who will be allowed to buy your product?”
      • At this point, Mr. Walton responds,
        • “It depends.”
    9. Welcome to the Admission Process at the Top Colleges
      • The current demand for a high quality college education results in the top schools becoming “selective.” They get to select who will be able to purchase their educational product.
      • If the student is striving to go to one of these colleges, it is important to understand this relationship between supply and demand.
    10. Supply and Demand
      • Supply is steady.
        • While there are many more students seeking to attend college, the number of openings has remained about the same.
      • Demand is growing overall.
        • The number of high school grads has never been higher.
          • Now exceeds 3,000,000
        • The percent going to college is increasing.
          • From 45% to nearly 60% since 1980’s
      • The increase in demand is greatest for students wanting to attend a “good school.”
        • Yet, of 2000 4-year colleges, only about 500 select fewer than 3 of 4 applicants.
    11. Perhaps this is the problem:
      • “It’s hard for kids to get into colleges because they only want to go to colleges that are hard to get into.”
    12. What to Do
      • When you are among a great many who want to purchase the education of a top college, it pays to know its selection standards.
      • This knowledge can help in 2 ways:
        • It can help you prepare, both inside and outside the classroom, to meet those standards
          • Courses, grades
          • Achievements, activities
        • It can help you make a realistic college list
    13. Life Isn’t Easy in Admissions
      • While admission offices make it hard on themselves because of their drive to generate more applications, it does create a problem.
      • There are more and more students to evaluate, but it is increasingly hard to choose among them.
    14. Consider:
      • There is academic “Bunching”
      • Increased enrollment in hard courses
        • Honors, Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate
        • College courses in high school, summer enrichment
      • Distinctions are blurred
        • Grade inflation (3.4 average h.s. GPA)
        • Multiple valedictorians, other honors
        • SAT recentering, take the highest score, subject tests, ACT strategy
        • Test prep courses
    15. And
      • There is personal “Polishing”
      • Students are more savvy about building a resume with activities and accomplishments, strategizing the essay, using summer for extra college prep
      • High schools feel the pressure -- reluctant to lessen student chances – inflation in teacher and counselor recs
    16. To Complicate Matters Further ..
      • College admission offices have a split personality
        • They are a meritocracy
          • Admit the best
        • They also practice “institutional engineering”
          • Admit to meet other objectives
      • The result is not one, but two admissions processes at top colleges
        • One for “regular” applicants
        • One for “special” applicants
      • This is where confusion increases and predictability decreases.
    17. What To Do
      • The most common reason a good student does not get admitted to a top college is that he is in the Regular category and doesn’t realize the admission standards for him are well above the published averages.
      • In fact, there may not be that many average admits.
          • A public university – 700 SAT out-of-state, 500 SAT in-state
      • In making college list, and estimating chances, important to know if you are a Regular or Special .
    18. Special Categories
      • The 4 most common Special categories are:
        • Listed athlete (+30%)
        • Underrepresented minority (where not restricted by legislation) (+28%)
        • Legacy (+20%)
        • Early applicant (+20%)
      • One that is growing in popularity:
        • Disadvantaged, low income, first generation college
    19. Other Special Categories
      • These tend to vary a great deal by institution.
        • In-state, out-of-state
        • Expressed interest
        • Special institutional need – female engineer, cello player, Latin scholar
        • Donors and other forms of service
        • Misc – president and trustee lists, faculty child, etc
    20. Special Categories
      • Examples:
        • Level 1
          • Recruited Division I Athletes
        • Level II
          • Affirmative action minorities (depending)
          • Non-scholarship athletes
          • State residents for publics
        • Level III
          • Legacies
          • Early Decision
          • Low income, disadvantaged background (may be level II)
          • Special institutional needs not formal – classics, dancer, tuba
          • Donors, President’s list (may be level II)
          • Faculty children
        • Level IV
          • Geography
          • Expressed interest
          • Other: sib enrolled, full pay
    21. Special Strategies
      • Minority -- find out if they give a preference
      • Legacy -- apply to college parents attended (Check grad school, grandparents, service)
      • Athlete – apply to colleges where you will be listed by coach
      • Apply early – E.D., E.A.
      • Disadvantaged – ask admission rep
      • Other --
    22. College List Making Advice
      • Regular – compare yourself to the top 75% of the academic profile
      • Special
        • Minority: 25 th - 50 th percentile
        • Listed athlete: the coach will tell you what your chances are. Div I and II scholarship athletes have minimum standards.
        • Legacy and E.D.: 40 th - 50 th percentile
    23. An Admission Exercise
      • Top colleges rate applicants on academic and personal scales.
      • Because they have to sort through so many apps, they use a number system.
      • Assume you are an admission officer and you are rating your student.
      • This system is 1 (low) to 8 (high) on both academic and personal.
    24. ACADEMIC RATING TABLE None None None School County State Region Intern/ National Acad Awards Courses ACT SAT Rank GPA Average 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 C- C C+ B/B- B+ A- A A+ 2.0-2.3 2.4-2.8 2.5-3.0 3.1-3.4 3.5-3.6 3.7-3.8 3.9 4.0 up Top 1/2 33% 25% 20% 10-15% 6-9% 3-5% 1-2% 400-470 480-540 550-590 600-640 650-670 680-700 710-740 750-800 16-19 20-22 23-25 26-28 29-30 31-32 33-34 35-36 Routine Some Pre-Coll All Pre-College Honors 1,2 AP Honors 3 AP 4 AP IB or All AP
    25. Personal Ratings
      • The personal rating assigned to an applicant is based on a combination of attributes in different areas. They typically include:
          • Achievement
          • Talent
          • Leadership/positions of responsibility
          • How you are revealed in the application
          • Service to others
          • Overcoming obstacles
          • Personal attributes
      • Personal attributes primarily come from school and teacher reports and required interviews. The categories are:
      • Respect accorded by faculty, class participation, academic achievement, intellectual promise, writing quality, creativity, work habits, maturity, motivation, leadership, integrity, reaction to setbacks, concern for others, self-confidence, initiative, and independence
    26. PERSONAL RATINGS Achievement/Talent/Leadership: None Personal Characteristics: Some questions Essay: negative impression Service/Obstacles: none/ none 1 Achievement/Talent/Leadership: Nothing stands out Personal Characteristics: Below average Essay: doesn’t add anything Service/Obstacles: none/ none 2 Achievement/Talent/Leadership: Average class/minor talent/ minor roles at best Personal Characteristics: Average Essay: fair Service/Obstacles: Only what’s required/ none 3 Achievement/Talent/Leadership: Minor school, good class/ typical talent/ occasional leader Personal Characteristics: Good Essay: typical Service/Obstacles: Typical contribution/ none 4 Achievement/Talent/Leadership: Major school/ above average talent/ solid leader Personal Characteristics: Very good Essay: adds to application Service/Obstacles: Well meaning contribution/ none 5 Achievement/Talent/Leadership: County, league-wide/ strong talent/ admirable leadership qualities Personal Characteristics: Excellent. Top 10% Essay: impresses reader Service/Obstacles: Well beyond typical service/ some obstacles 6 Achievement/Talent/Leadership: Regional, state/ unusual talent/ very strong leader Personal Characteristics: Outstanding, top 5% Essay: passed around admission office Service/Obstacles: Significant role in important service/ quite difficult road 7 Achievement/Talent/Leadership: International, national/ rare talent/ extraordinary leader Personal Characteristics: ”One of few in career.” Essay: will appear in “How to Write Essays” book Service/Obstacles: Extraordinary contribution, major effect/ overcame severe obstacles 8
      • 8
      PERSONAL/ACADEMIC COMBINED Personal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Acad
    27. Minimally competitive 6 St Josephs, Vermont, UNH, UMass, Catholic, Susquehanna, Clarkson, NJ Tech, Hofstra, Purdue, Colorado 7 SUNY Buffalo, Minnesota, Rowan, Clark, Ithaca, Quinnipiac, Drew, St Lawrence, VMI, BYU, St Lawrence, Wooster 8 UConn, Rutgers, Ohio State, Penn State, Delaware, Syracuse, Loyola, Northeastern, Fordham, Providence, Fairfield, Skidmore, Babson 9 SUNY Binghamton, Wisconsin, Illinois, F&M, TCNJ, RPI, American, Villanova, BU, Smith, Holy Cross, Stevens, Lafayette, Gettysburg, Union 10 Michigan, UNC, Maryland, Wake Forest, BC, NYU, GW, Colgate, Oberlin, Colby, Hamilton, Bates, Bucknell, Trinity, Richmond, Conn College 11 UVA, William & Mary, Cal, UCLA, USC, Cornell, JHU, NW, Vandy, ND, G’twn, Claremont-McKenna, Middlebury, Carleton, Wesleyan, Haverford, Chicago, Emory, Carnegie-Mellon, Bowdoin, Vassar, Davidson, W&L 12 Columbia, Brown, Dartmouth, Penn, Duke, Wash U, Rice, Amherst, Williams 13 HYP, Stanford, MIT, Cal Tech 14
    28. Specials
      • The rating system is a constant. The definition of an Academic 6 or a Personal 5 does not change.
      • What does change is who, at a given rating, gets admitted, and who doesn’t.
      • Strong specials, i.e. minorities and athletes might move up 2 levels, legacy and E.D. 1 level. (For example, a listed “10” athlete has a chance at a “12” college.)
    29. How To Improve Your Chances
      • Make a realistic list, 3-5-2. Be enthusiastic about match schools.
      • Take good courses
      • Plan test taking strategy, including ACT
      • Add colleges where you might be a Special
      • Look at personal side. Avoid resume fillers, try to distinguish yourself. The “2 strong” profile is appealing.
      • Pay attention to teacher recs, essay, evaluative interview
      • Below top level expressed interest can be important
      • Essay – answer the question, make it about you, show attractive quality, endearing flaw better than bragging, something you care about
    30. Conclusion
      • Plan ahead to present the best version of who you are, not a makeover. Look for polish, not plastic surgery.
      • Don’t try to become a different person for the sake of college admission.
      • Have a number of “strike zone” colleges that you will be pleased to attend.
      • Finding a college that fulfills your academic potential and is a good fit personally is more important then attending the “better” school.

    + guest5cfbcdaguest5cfbcda, 2 years ago

    custom

    953 views, 2 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 953
      • 953 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 2
    • Downloads 14
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories