Public Section Information _ Current situation in the EU. Ponente:Michael Nicholson_PSI Alliance - Presentation Transcript
Public Section Information Current situation in the EU III Aporta Meeting, Madrid Michael Nicholson Deputy Chair of the PSI Alliance Expert Member APPSI Managing Director, Intelligent Addressing Limited 9 th June 2009
What has changed over the past ten years?
Internet has transformed communication
Ability to store, manipulate and retrieve huge amounts of data has been revolutionized
Technical competence has exploded
Has PSI re-use kept pace?
The largest source of information in Europe (Review of Directive)
Market size for re-use in 2006 was €27 billion (MEPSIR)
But a fraction of what it could be ………
Market for value-added meteorological products (2006, Pettifer)
USA- $1.4 billion pa
EU - $372 million pa
Why?...... Charging policies adopted in the EU
Failure to exploit information assets costing UK €70billion pa (2008, Capgemini)
What is the problem?
PSI forms vital part of every nation’s information infrastructure
PSI producers are natural public monopolies
But who owns PSI? The State or Citizen?
Some States attempt to exploit their PSI
Exploiting PSI creates a burden on State and enterprise and is a barrier to innovation
Is it worth charging for PSI?
Probably not!
Eurostat calculates that 39.6% of private sector economic activity is returned in tax
Public Sector should “control production” of “Public Task” data and the Private Sector should take risks and innovate
However State should recover the costs of initial distribution or there is no incentive to do so
Emotional attachment should be discouraged! The data belongs to the citizen …..
Current situation on PSI re-use
The Directive forced recognition of “an issue”
Different understanding of the “issue” across the EU
Different practices across the EU
Lack of recognition of the scale of the problems
Homogenous solution looks very difficult
Especially at a time of financial crisis
Little protection for the re-user currently…. The PSI Directive is inadequate
It only covers PSI activities that are part of Public Task
It does not properly define Public Task
It defines PSI as “documents”
It allows for charging at more than Marginal Cost
By implication, it permits product cross-subsidization
Policy proposals (1)
State should first define what information it requires for good government and it should then procure it
The definition of PSI should be decided by independent committee focusing on Statutory responsibility and market shortcomings
The State should own PSI
PSI should be available for re-use at the marginal cost of distribution
If State believes it must exploit PSI then alternatively…..
Complete separation of upstream (raw/basic data) production activities from downstream (value-added) commercial activities
Re-users must have access to upstream data on same terms as State resellers
Must still define PSI and set boundaries to activity
Must ensure accounting regime is based on true product cost
Must ensure advice and decisions are not conflicted
Must create a substantial Regulatory regime that works
To summarise …..
Lack of recognition in most of the EU of the scale of the problem or its true cost
Solutions not straightforward or quick to implement
0 comments
Post a comment