Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

C:\Users\Allie Franklin\Documents\Module 6

354

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
354
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. By: Alyssa Franklin<br />Module 6<br />
  • 2. Menu Slide<br />The Effects of a Voluntary Summer Reading Intervention on Reading Activities and Reading Achievement. Slides 3,4,5<br />Teacher Read Alouds at second grade with and without student companion texts: Unexpected Findings. Slides 6,7,8<br />Curriculum materials for elementray reading shackles and scaffolds for four beginning teachers. Slides 9,10,11<br />
  • 3. Summary <br />331 Random children were picked from grades 1-5.<br />They took standardized testing in spring on the elementrary reading attitude survey and a reading prevance survey.<br />Characteristics of the Children (N 331) at the Beginning of<br />the Study<br />Student characteristic %<br />Female 50<br />White 42<br />Receives free lunch 23<br />Primary language is English 68<br />Primary language is Spanish 23<br />
  • 4. Summary<br />Students were placed in a classroom and told to read ten books that matched their reading levels.<br />In september children were readminstered the reading test and completed the survey over their summer readings <br />There were no significant difference<br />
  • 5. Personal reflection<br />I believe children are born with different abilities regarding intelligence. Some kids are better at spelling or reading or math. I believe that this project did not make much sense to me.<br />
  • 6. Summary<br />Project on the effects of teacher read alouds when students did and did not have access to textbooks.<br />Theory- studetns with textbooks would outperform just the listening group on the three examined variables.1. reading achievement gains 2. vocabulary scores 3. comprehension scores.<br />There were 20 students involved<br />IRI was used as a pre and post test to measure reading achievement gains during intervention.<br />
  • 7. Summary<br />Teacher also made a comprehension test and vocabulary<br />Students listened to the teacher read alouds for 15min a day three times a week for 12 weeks<br />Students in the listen only group had a greater reading achievement than the studetns in the companion text group<br />Comprehension and vocab scores did not change<br />
  • 8. Personal Reflection<br />Unlike the first project I believe this project was more effective. It showed that students listen more when they don’t have a book infront of them.<br />
  • 9. Summary<br />Purpose of this study was to learn how begginningelementrary teachers understand and used the curriculum materials for teaching<br />They followed four teachers from different schools<br />Provided a variety of curriculum materials ranging from scripted reading programs to supplemental materials without teaching guides<br />Data was gathered by classroom observations, interviews, and curriculum artifacts over the teachers first three years of teaching<br />
  • 10. Summary<br />Teachers with stronger knowledge access to multiple materials and support for classroom making regarding materials and instructional strategies learned the most and were most able to adapt instruction<br />Found that teachers with weak knowledge or more restrictive materials and enviroment learned the least and were least able to adapt instruction to meet the needs of their students<br />
  • 11. Personal Reflection<br />This was interesting project, but I think you cannot study a teacher that has never taught before and judge her because everyone says that you as the teacher still learn and figure out what methods work and which ones don’t.<br />
  • 12. Citations<br />Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol 99(3) U.S.: American Psychological Association pp.505-515<br />Kaplan, J., & Tracey, D. (2008). Teacher Read-Alouds at second grade, with and without Student Companion Texts: Unexpected Findings.”Online Submission ERIC EBSCOhost(accessed April 12, 2010)<br />Valencia, S., Place, N., Martin, S., & Grossman, P. (2006). Curriculum Materials for Elementrary Reading: Shackles and Scaffolds for four beginning Teachers . Elementrary School journal 107,no. 1:93-121 ERIC, EBSCOhost (accessed April 12, 2010).<br />

×