Software development at INRIA

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Software development at INRIA - Presentation Transcript

    1. From research prototype to reliable software Cl é ment MATHIEU
    2. How to build reliable software at INRIA ? How to fulfill both engineer and researcher requirements ?
    3. Here is what we * do * OASIS / ProActive
    4. Outline
      • Introduction
        • Team
        • Product
        • Issues
      • Evolution
      • Tools & Processes
      • Conclusion
    5. The OASIS team
    6. Created in 1999 .
    7. Based at Sophia Antipolis .
    8. Distributed and Parallel Computing.
    9. 5 researchers 10 PhDs 10 engineers ~17 Interns
    10. * an INRIA spin off ActiveEon *
    11. The ProActive middleware
    12. ProActive Written in Java
    13. ProActive
    14. Our issues * * One of
    15. Researchers/PhDs are not Engineers * * And don’t want to be
    16. They want to publish papers .
    17. We want (bullet proof) software (with eye candies) .
    18. How to work together ?
    19. Outline
      • Introduction
      • Evolution
      • Tools & Processes
      • Conclusion
    20. 1998: Project Started .
    21. 2000: CVS .
    22. 2003: Coding Standards .
    23. 2003: Functional Testing . (Home made)
    24. 2005: Subversion .
    25. 2007: Junit 4 .
    26. 2007: Continuous Integration .
    27. 2007: JIRA Bug Tracking .
    28. Today: Branching .
    29. Outline
      • Introduction
      • Evolution
      • Tools & Processes
        • Principles
        • Continuous Integration
        • Branching
        • Bug Tracking
      • Conclusion
    30. Principle Automation is the way
    31. Which tool ?
      • Avoid tool dependency
      • Community matters
      • Good looking helps adoption
    32. Continuous Integration Hudson * rocks ! * Thanks Kohsuke
    33. Continuous Integration The whole test suite is run after each commit
    34. Continuous Integration Lots of nightly builds / checks
    35. Continuous Integration Success Failure Code Correctly Formatted 14% 86%
    36. Continuous Integration Success Failure Unstable Build Results 41% 44% 15%
    37. Continuous Integration Junit trend
    38. Continuous Integration
    39. Branching Inspired by agile methods to ease both engineer and researcher work
    40. Branching
      • Short iteration
      • For engineers
      • Feature related
      • Merged ASAP
      • Synchronized
      • Long Iteration
      • For research
      • Person related
      • Hopefully merged
    41. Branching Each branch has a referee
    42. Branching Continuous Integration only applies to the trunk
    43. Branching Avoid heavy branching
    44. JIRA Bug Tracker
    45. Outline
      • Introduction
      • Evolution
      • Tools & Processes
      • Conclusion
    46. Conclusion building blocks already exist*. * We did not invented them
    47. Conclusion It’s all about tradeoff . Maintenance costs VS productivity gains.
    48. Conclusion We will provide feedback * * And I want to hear your
    49. Clément MATHIEU Ingénieur Associé INRIA Sophia – Antipolis Projet OASIS

    + guest4b8deguest4b8de, 2 years ago

    custom

    1057 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1057
      • 1057 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 19
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories