Barcelona Sarah Meta Analysis

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Barcelona Sarah Meta Analysis - Presentation Transcript

    1. Meta-Analytic Examination of Studies of the Correlation Between Negative Body Image, Disordered Eating, and Extent of Exposure to Mass Media Michael P. Levine and Sarah K. Murnen (Kenyon College) Jennifer Smith (Klein Associates) Lisa M. Groesz (University of Texas) Paper presented at the International Conference on Eating Disorders, Barcelona, Spain, June 9, 2006
    2. Fundamental Question:
      • Does more extensive use of – and thus exposure to – media, such as fashion magazines and television, cultivate and reinforce
        • internalization of cultural beauty
        • ideals
        • body image dissatisfaction
        • weight control behaviors, and
        • disordered eating?
    3. Secondary Questions:
      • Do different types of media (e.g., magazines vs. television) yield different effects?
      • Do media affect various outcomes differently?
      • Is there a gender difference in effect sizes?
    4. Method
      • Published and unpublished studies that related media exposure in a naturalistic setting to scores on measures related to body dissatisfaction and eating problems
      • Effect size = Fisher r ( z test for statistical significance)
      • 23 ([3 X 4 X 2] - 1) different data sets were compiled:
        • Three Categories of Media = 1. Combined media 2. Television exposure 3. Magazine exposure
        • Four Categories of Dependent Measures = 1. Internalization
        • 2. Body Image 3. Weight Control 4. Eating Disorder Symptoms
        • Females vs. Males ( note there were insufficient data for TV exposure
        • and internalization among males )
    5. Method (continued)
      • 47 studies were used in the analyses, which yielded 298 effect sizes with data from 20,550 individuals (14,956 females, and 5,594 males)
      • Many samples contributed data for more than one effect size, so the total number of data points across the samples was 104,482 (80,482 from females, 24,000 from males)
      • The smallest data set, correlating TV exposure and internalization, contained three effect sizes ( k = 3) from 1,093 males.
      • One of the larger data sets, examining the association between combined media exposure and body image dissatisfaction, contained 33 effect sizes ( k = 33) from 9,227 females.
    6. Method (continued)
      • Homogeneity in r values across studies was examined
      • Within many of the data sets it was possible to examine the extent to which certain study characteristics affected variation in the size of r . The study characteristics examined :
        • Age of the participants: samples younger than 18 compared to samples older than 18
        • Type of dependent measure (e.g., for internalization of cultural ideal many studies used the SATAQ – those studies were grouped together and compared to studies using other measures to see if there was variation associated with the measure)
        • Whether the sample was from the United States or not
        • The ethnicity of the sample: samples with >80% Caucasian compared to samples that were <80% Caucasian
    7. Results
      • In the data sets for females ( n = 12), all effect sizes were statistically significant; in most data sets the effects were heterogeneous
      • In the data sets for males ( n = 11), 7 ( ~ ¾) of the effect sizes were significant, and in four data sets they were heterogeneous
      • Generally, effects were stronger for females (range of r =
      • = .07 to .21) than males (range of r = .03 to .13)
      • For females, effects were strongest for fashion magazines, and the largest effect is fashion magazines and internalization of the slender beauty ideal
    8. Data for Females INTERN = internalization slender ideal BODIMG = body image WTCON = weight control DISEAT = disordered eating
    9. Data for Males INTERN = internalization slender ideal BODIMG = body image WTCON = weight control DISEAT = disordered eating
    10. Combined Media: Females vs. Males INTERN = internalization slender ideal BODIMG = body image WTCON = weight control DISEAT = disordered eating Significant gender differences, two-tailed *p<.05 **p<.01 ***p<.001
    11. TV Exposure: Females vs. Males INTERN = internalization slender ideal BODIMG = body image WTCON = weight control DISEAT = disordered eating
    12. Magazine Exposure: Females vs. Males INTERN = internalization slender ideal BODIMG = body image WTCON = weight control DISEAT = disordered eating Significant gender differences, two-tailed *p<.05 **p<.01 ***p<.001
    13. Highlights of Heterogeneity Analyses
      • Females :
        • Age affected variation in r in 5 data sets but not in a consistent direction (media seemed to lead to greater r’ s for internalization among younger girls; greater associations with weight control among older girls)
        • Measure used significantly affected variation in r in 7 of the 12 data sets
        • In 4 of the 12 data sets the r values from the U.S. samples were significantly higher than those from non-U.S. samples
        • In 6 of the 12 data sets the r values for the predominantly Caucasian group were the highest
      • Males: Data sets were not sufficiently large to reach any generalizations about patterns of variation related to these variables
    14. Conclusions & Discussion
      • In general, the data are consistent with
        • sociocultural models that point to the media as a source of information and reinforcement for the components of negative body image and disordered eating.
        • theories suggesting that greater use of and involvement with fashion and style magazines and with TV is associated with greater levels of the components of disordered eating
      • Effect sizes (small to moderate) are comparable with those in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of sociocultural factors as predictors (see Cafri et al., 2005; Stice, 2002).
        • Converting data for females the concerning magazine exposure and “trait” body image in this study, r = .13, d = .26
        • compared to the effect size from a meta-analysis of experimental research relating exposure to slender media and “state” body image, r = .15, d = .31
    15. Conclusions & Discussion
      • With respect to gender
        • Females may be more influenced by (and involved with) fashion magazines
        • Males may be more influenced by TV than magazines (although)
        • Females and males at high risk for eating disorders may both be particularly susceptible to media messages
      • Much remains to be known and done in terms of research
        • Data are all correlational, so we can’t determine causation; not enough longitudinal data
        • Types of media
          • Can’t distinguish well between effects of particular types of media (e.g., magazines that emphasize a slender ideal vs. those that emphasize fitness)
          • Relatively unstudied types (e.g., video games, the internet, pornography)
        • Other important variables
          • Mediators (e.g., social comparison; appearance schema)
          • Moderators, especially age, ethnicity, culture/ethnicity

    + guest3bd2a12guest3bd2a12, 2 years ago

    custom

    118 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 118
      • 118 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories