A soluble product for anaerobic biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons
Delivers sulfate into the subsurface to:
Stimulate microbial growth for degradation of contaminants
We Have A Petroleum Release
Hydrocarbon Impacted Aquifers
Conventional Wisdom
Add Oxygen
Electron Acceptors Products
Oxygen >>> Water, CO 2
Nitrate >>> Nitrogen, CO 2
Fe(III) >>> Fe(II), CO 2
Mn(IV) >>> Mn(II), CO 2
Sulfate >>> Sulfide, CO 2
CO 2 or acetic acid >>> Methane
Contaminant (Electron donor) e.g. BTEX e - e - and C Energy Microbial Growth Aerobic Anaerobic
Biodegradation of Fuel Contaminants In Groundwater Is Accomplished Mostly By Sulfate-Utilizing Microbes Based on median consumptions of electron acceptors at 38 hydrocarbon sites Ref: Weidemeier, T.H et al. All other electron accepting processes Based on median consumptions of electron acceptors at 74 sites – EPA-BP study Based on median consumptions of electron acceptors at 42 AFCEE sites
Why Sulfate? Mass of Benzene Degraded per Unit Mass of EA: Oxygen = 0.33; Sulfate = 0.22 Electron Acceptor (EA) Maximum Concentration (mg/L) Potential Benzene Degraded (mg/L) Issues Oxygen (in air) 9 – 10 3.0 – 3.3
Hydrogen sulfide; never documented as an issue in the field
Secondary MCL for sulfate
250 mg/L*
EAS ™ >1,000 >220
How Does EAS ™ Work?
Growth-Promoting Biological Reduction
Energy + Electron Donor (Food) Electron Acceptor (something to breathe) [O 2 , NO 3 , SO 4 , TCE, etc.] Waste Products [CO 2 , N 2 , FeS 2 , Cl - ] + + (Drawing Modified from AFCEE and Wiedemeier) Microbe Microbes EAS™
Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria (SRB) Reaction
Petroleum Hydrocarbon + EAS ™
+ Dissolved Iron Iron Sulfide + H 2 O + MgCO 3 + CO 2
Iron Sulfide and Magnesium Carbonate are insoluble and immobile.
Why Sulfate Enhancement?
Accelerates site cleanup, typically in about 18 months
In Situ and minimally disruptive to the site and surroundings given injection can be accomplished in any well or geo-probe boring
Cost effective in achieving client remediation goals as most projects can be completed within 3-4 injections
Safe to the environment and people
A “Green Technology” which enhances natural conditions and reduces carbon foot print when compared to conventional remediation– a socially responsible approach to remediation
Proven by case study results on numerous site types
Technical Advantages of EAS ™
Exists naturally
High solubility
Easily applied
Safe
Minimal site disruption
Minimal O&M
Benefits
Minimal site disruption
In situ approach with no ongoing O&M activities
Cost effective
Benefits
Safe
Green – Natural Process
Benefits
Accelerated cleanup
Information gained significantly strengthens advocacy position with regulatory agencies
Monitoring frequency showed no lag time for acclimation of native sulfate reducing bacteria
Contaminants that can be Treated with EAS ™
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
TPH
BTEX
MTBE
How much EAS ™ is required
Generally 3-4 EAS ™ applications
~ 0.11 - 0.33 lbs / CY
Depending on concentration levels
Site conditions
Etc.
Application Overview
After an EAS TM application, sulfate levels initially rise and then decrease in conjunction with the reduction of contamination levels.
If the contaminant is still present and sulfate is at background levels, another application may be needed.
Case Study Jackson, MI
Site Background
Former gasoline service station with two confirmed releases in 1992 and 2001.
Historical remedial efforts with limited success included groundwater pump and treat and monitored natural attenuation.
Geology consists of fine to medium sand with groundwater present about 10 feet bgs.
Site selected by MDEQ for Pilot Study to demonstrate feasibility of in situ EAS TM Technology.
Pilot study was not intended to be a “full scale” site remediation.
Jackson, MI October 2007
Baseline Conditions
Sulfate is depleted in core
Sulfate background is > 50 ppm
Max. BTEX is >10,000 ppb
Jackson, MI November 2006
3 months after initial application
Sulfate still elevated in core of plume
BTEX >5,000 ppb is shrinking
Jackson, MI April 2007
6 months after first application
Sulfate concentrations have returned to baseline conditions
BTEX plume is stable with reduced peak concentrations
Application Experience
Applied at over 100 sites
FL, CA, MI, IN, IL, WV, VA, IA, GA & NY
Method of Injection & application
Infiltration trenches
Vertical wells
Surficial spreading
Former recovery wells
Former SVE wells
Variety of geological and hydrogeological settings
Overview of Patented Process
US Patent No. 7,138,060
Issued November 21, 2006
Patent issued for:
A process that enhances the environmental conditions existing within a contaminant plume by replenishing a natural groundwater compound required by bacteria to degrade the contaminants.
Sulfate solution in excess of 1,000 ppm
Covers all pollutants that can be degraded by sulfate-reducing microorganisms
Conclusion
Enhancement of biodegradation with the addition of EAS TM is a viable technique to safely and aggressively remediate BTEX, MTBE and petroleum impacted groundwater.
Design, implement and monitoring is a relative easy process.
Magnesium sulfate technology for the anerobic treat more
Magnesium sulfate technology for the anerobic treatment of petroleum based contaminants. Used on upwards of 100 sites accross the country over the last 10 years. less
0 comments
Post a comment