Educause 08 Part 1
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
847
On Slideshare
847
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Finding the Good Fit: Faculty Members, Instruction, Evidence, and Technology Patricia A. McGee, PhD [email_address] Associate Professor/2003 NLII Fellow Instructional Technology Department of Educational Psychology University of Texas at San Antonio Veronica M. Diaz, PhD [email_address] Instructional Technology Manager Maricopa Center for Learning and Instruction Maricopa Community Colleges Adjunct Professor, Northern Arizona University
  • 2. Welcome
    • Introductions
    • Materials
      • Binder
      • CD
      • Presentation materials available at http://elearning-design.pbwiki.com/
  • 3. Seminar Overview
    • Web 2.0: Diffusion, Instructional Development and Support
    • Understanding Faculty Members and Learners and Web 2.0
    • Content, Pedagogy, Assessment, and Tools
  • 4. Part I Web 2.0: Diffusion, Instructional Development and Support
  • 5. Web 2.0 (Twitter) and the World Simulation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgbfMY-6giY
  • 6. WEB 2.0
    • Model of Diffusion and Other Considerations
  • 7.  
  • 8.  
  • 9. Sources: http://www.jeffro2pt0.com/images/web1_0-vs-web2_0.png and ttp://jensthraenhart.com/cblog/uploads/web20.jpg
  • 10. Technology Adoption Lifecycle
    • http://techticker.net/2008/06/06/technology-adoption-lifecycle/
  • 11. Web 2.0 Tools and Distributed Learning Models
  • 12. Delivery Models Sloan-C, 2007 The Models Proportion of Content Delivered Online Type of Course Typical Description 0% Traditional Course with no online technology used — content is delivered in writing or orally. 1 to 29% Web Enhanced Course which uses web-based technology to facilitate what is essentially a face-to-face course. Uses a course management system (CMS) or web pages to post the syllabus and assignments, for example. 30 to 79% Blended/Hybrid Distributed Engagement Course that blends online and face-to-face delivery. Substantial proportion of the content is delivered online, typically uses online discussions, and typically has some face-to-face meetings. 80% + Online A course where most or all of the content is delivered online. Typically have no face-to-face meetings.
  • 13. Buffet Model
    • Allows the learner to complete instructional sequences at their own pace
    • Various learning environments
    • Various supports
    • On-campus and distributed environments
    • Allows students to progress through material in the way and speed that is most appropriate for them
    Example: Foothill College, Math My Way
  • 14. Blended/Hybrid (Replacement)
    • Blended learning courses combine online and classroom learning activities and resources in an optimal way to improve student learning outcomes and to address important institutional issues
    • Classroom attendance (“seat time”) is reduced
    Example: Estrella Mountain Community College, Learning College
  • 15. 100% Online
    • All course activities, resources, interactions, and communications occur online, typically through an institutional learning/course management system
    Example: Rio Salado College Online
  • 16. Models and Web 2.0
    • The containers
    • Redesign approach
    • Pedagogy
    • Discipline
  • 17. What models are you most active in?
    • Web enhanced (F2F)
    • Buffet
    • Blended/Hybrid
    • Online
  • 18. INSTRUCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT MODELS AND SUPPORT
  • 19. Akker, 1998; Goodlad, 1994; Romiszowski,1981
  • 20. Program and Course Levels
    • Inputs
    • Goals
    • Objectives
    • Standards
    • Institutional mission
    • Goals
    • Objectives
    • Constituents
    • Administrators
    • Faculty members
    • Staff
    • Students
    • Faculty members
    • Students
    Program Level Course Level
  • 21. Object (Module or Unit) and Individual Levels
    • Inputs
    • Objectives
    • Technology selection
    • Development team
      • Designers
      • Media specialists
      • Technologists
      • Granular, at course level
    • Constituents
    • Faculty members
    • Students
    • Faculty members
    • Students
    Object Level Individual Level
  • 22. Delivery models, instructional development models, and support
  • 23. Diffusion of Innovation ?
  • 24. Experimentational Transitions
    • Stages
    • Experimentation
    • Extension and transition
    • Standardization of support
    • Integration into curriculum
    • Diffusion
    • Characteristics
    • Data collection throughout
    • Communication with campus community
    • Innovative culture
    • Strong connection to curriculum and disciplines
    • Robust support for the faculty and students
  • 25. Support Models & Innovation
    • Relationship to development models
    • Relationship to innovation and diffusion
    • Centralized
    • Experimental/pilot
    • Decentralized
    • None
  • 26. WEB 2.0 AND INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES/CONSIDERATIONS
  • 27. Quality Assurance and Web 2.0
  • 28. Peer Course Review Feedback Course Instructional Designers Institutions Faculty Course Developers National Standards & Research Literature Rubric Faculty Reviewers Training Quality Matters Course Peer Review Process Course Meets Quality Expectations Course Revision
  • 29. QM Certified Peer Reviewers
    • Peer Reviewers receive full-day training to learn
      • How to interpret the standards (with examples and annotations)
      • How to evaluate a course (hands-on with sample course)
    • Reviews are conducted by teams of three peer reviewers
      • Chair
      • Peer reviewer (external)
      • Peer reviewer (SME)
  • 30. More about Quality Matters
    • Quality Matters (QM) is a faculty-centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online and hybrid courses and online components
    • A faculty-driven, collaborative peer review process
    • Committed to continuous quality improvement
    • Based in national standards of best practice, the research literature and instructional design principles
    • Designed to promote student learning and success
  • 31. The Rubric is the Core of Quality Matters
    • 40 specific elements across 8 broad areas (general standards) of course quality
    • Detailed annotations and examples of good practice for all 40 standards
  • 32. Quality Matters & Alignment
  • 33. Essential Standards that Relate to Alignment
    • A statement introduces the student to the course and learning
    • Navigational instructions
    • Learning activities foster interaction:
        • Instructor-student
        • Content-student
        • Student-student
    • Clear standards are set for instructor response and availability
    • Assessment strategies provide feedback
    • Grading policy is transparent and easy to understand
    • Implemented tools and media support learning objectives
        • and integrate with texts and lesson assignments
    • The course acknowledges the importance of ADA compliance
  • 34. Other QM Uses
    • College quality assurance review processes
    • Guidelines for online/hybrid course development
    • Faculty development/training programs
    • Checklist for improvement of existing online courses
    • An element in regional and professional accreditation
  • 35. Intellectual Property & Web 2.0
    • How broad or inclusive? What tools or learning environments should be addressed?
    • How is maintenance of instructional products and systems addressed?
    • Employees or units involved in the production process, work time/course of employment issues, resources expended, or units involved?
    • Innovation within or outside established, controlled university-owned systems?
  • 36. Copyright
    • Connection to models
    • Open tools
      • YouTube
      • Wikis
    • Faculty perceptions of copyright and fair use
    • Liability issues
    • Student education
    • Best practices
  • 37. Three Questions
    • Describe existing instructional delivery and development models for integrating technology into instruction.
    • What are your teaching and learning goals for Web 2.0 tools?
    • What are the support issues that will need to be addressed to achieve your Web 2.0 goals?