DSS 20 04 2009 PPT Tom, Mark, Bas

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    DSS 20 04 2009 PPT Tom, Mark, Bas - Presentation Transcript

    1. Realtime supply of Information UVT   Mark Daams, Tom van Eijk & Bas Pronk April 20, 2009
    2. Issue   Improving the supply of information to students to increase the awareness and participation of students.   E.g. grades are sent to students the instant they are published.  
    3. Proposition Improving the supply of information Advantages Disadvantages • Increased participation and awareness • Improved decision making position • Improving the level of service • Quick and reliable   • Information overload • Security and privacy issues • Extra costs
    4. Progress report
      • Brainstorming (all)
      • Questionnaires
        • Students (Tom)
        • Teachers (Mark)
        • IT department (Bas)
        • Overall design (Mark)
      • Solution / Implementation (all)
      • Decision making process / outcome (all)
      • Case study
        • Information request (Tom)
        • Processing information (all)
      • Various things
        • Video (Mark / Tom)
        • Presentation (all)
        • Final report (Bas thus far)
      •  
    5. Stakeholders Students • Quantitative research        
    6.  
    7. Stakeholders Teachers • Quantitative research      
    8.  
    9. Stakeholders IT departement • Quantitative research      
    10.  
    11. Solution (1)   Text message notification How it works      
      • (un)Subscribe option
      • Automatically be informed of grade information
      • Choice between notifications and/or information 
      •  
      Excerpt Coen Esser, student Erasmus School of Management:     “ Met name als een college uitvalt of de zaal wijzigt, is het sms-systeem enorm handig. Je kijkt niet altijd voordat je naar de uni gaat op internet, en het is dan wel zo makkelijk als je weet dat iets niet doorgaat of de lokatie is gewijzigd.”
    12. Solution (2)   Text message notification Excerpt Peter van der Landen (IT architect) Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam:     Studenten krijgen met SMS niet alleen snel, maar ook alleen de gewenste informatie. Privacy bij cijfers is een voordeel.” Key advantages
      • Effective
      • High level of attention
      • Speed
      •   Higher service level
      • Less time and cost consuming
      •  
    13. Implementation plan (1) Text message notification Option 1 •  Control •  Use of own hardware/software • Be able to provide better service • Better intregation of applications • Possiblities for expansion Internal implementation (internal IT department) Advantages •  Variable costs •  Increased workload •  Start-up issues •  Lack of “know-how” Disadvantages Excerpts from our IT department     “ should be able to implement this within half a year … positive attitude towards this solution … would like to keep this under own control … vague notion of costs and technology…”
    14. Implementation plan (2) Text message notification Option 2 External implementation (third-party solution) Advantages Disadvantages •  No SMS infrastructure required •  Fixed costs per text message •  Faster to implement •  Privacy •  Level of service •  Dependency
    15. Case study (1) Text message notification Erasmus University Rotterdam
      • Implemented in 2000
      • Blackboard API
      • Study Information Network (aka our Study-guide) API
      • Custom application (within SIN);
        • collects grade data
        • handles students preferences
        • publishes data to third party
      Excerpt Peter van der Landen, (IT architect) Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam:     “ Omdat de EUR er vroeg bij was, waren er bijvoorbeeld nog geen building blocks voor Blackboard beschikbaar. Met eigen applicaties zijn goede resultaten te bereiken. Een externe aanbieder heeft toch andere belangen” Wireless Services B.V.
      • Third party which texts students
    16. Case study (2) Text message notification Excerpt Peter van der Landen, (IT architect) Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam:     “ Het gehele systeem werkt goed en levert voor zowel het personeel als voor de studenten meerwaarde op. Voor alle onderwijsinstellingen is het aan te raden, mits technisch en financieel haalbaar.” Characteristics
      • Implementation duration was a week
      • Automated
        • Teacher hands in Excel file with grade data
        • SIN and Blackboard process the data
        • Third party sends SMS
      • Only students have access to their number
      • Communication barriers have disappeared
      • 23.000 students use this service
      • 102.000 text messages in one year
        • Costing €6.600 (€ 0,0647 per message)
    17. Decision Making Decision Making Process     Costs Time Service Technology Privacy Variable costs Implementation Up-time Hardware Security Fixed costs Service desk Software Long-term Questions from students Knowledge Short-Term Staff required Outcome     Fusion between option 1 & 2 Grade data (IT department) SMS operator (Mollie, RedBoxSMS, or Wireless Services) Students API SMS
    18. Questions?   Feel free to ask them …  
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + guest1d23b402guest1d23b402 Nominate

    custom

    353 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 353
      • 353 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 7
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories