Creating your organizational learning infrastructure George Siemens Corporate Learning: Trends and Innovations November 20...
traditional approach
we know
content
tools
goals
They don’t
so
we designed
infrastructure of learning
using
acronyms
LMS
CMS
LCMS
and terms
{insert your own buzzwords}
But
mismatched
concepts
approaches
forgot context
neglected learner
strategy
intent of learning
created a static infrastructure
tools
process
reflected views of learners and knowledge
where are we?
information growth
different people
different competitors
different rules
BRIC
and yet...
value=ability to function in this space
what do we need?
an infrastructure of adaptability
points of tension retained
not eliminated
diversity
but...
we also need stability
we need approaches
understood at the decision table
web 2.0, blogs, wikis, social media, social networking,  enterprise 2.0, podcasts, virtual worlds, participatory culture, ...
aren't
What is understood?
strategy
performance
return/investment
global competitiveness
experimentation? ROI?
They don’t
in a cycle of transition
transition=uncertainty
uncertainty=changed metrics
walk in two dimensions
They don’t
how do we make sense?
learning infrastructure
tools
approach
design
view of LOCT
learner
organization
content
technology
structure for tomorrow’s needs
KM? CM? EPSS? JIT?
if it’s learning to do/act/think, it doesn’t matter what you call it
fragmentation=different results
centralization=familiarity and consistency
so...
match task to intent
clear outcomes?
innovate?
enter new market?
different paths lead in different directions
Conceptual Experimental Implementation
Learning needs
one approach
won't work
act in context
They don’t
deep smarts
diverse smarts
a model
Simple Model <ul><li>Analysis and validation </li></ul><ul><li>Ecology and network fostering </li></ul><ul><li>Adaptive le...
They don’t
They don’t Domain: Analysis and Validation
They don’t Domain: Ecology and Network Fostering
They don’t Domain: Adaptive Learning  and Knowledge Cycle
They don’t Domain: System Review and Validation
Domain: Impacting Factors
They don’t Domain: Impacting Factors
is that even practical?
think holistically
design for complexity
complexity for design
design for diversity
tools
context
learning format
multiplicity
what happens tomorrow? next week?
reflect
evaluate context
experiment aggressively
implement thoughtfully
function in gradients
redesign the design
redesign the structure
[email_address] www.elearnspace.org www.knowingknowledge.com www.complexive.com
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Creating Your Organizational Learning Infrastructure

7,286 views
7,165 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
7,286
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
59
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
234
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Creating Your Organizational Learning Infrastructure

  1. 1. Creating your organizational learning infrastructure George Siemens Corporate Learning: Trends and Innovations November 20, 2007
  2. 2. traditional approach
  3. 3. we know
  4. 4. content
  5. 5. tools
  6. 6. goals
  7. 7. They don’t
  8. 8. so
  9. 9. we designed
  10. 10. infrastructure of learning
  11. 11. using
  12. 12. acronyms
  13. 13. LMS
  14. 14. CMS
  15. 15. LCMS
  16. 16. and terms
  17. 17. {insert your own buzzwords}
  18. 18. But
  19. 19. mismatched
  20. 20. concepts
  21. 21. approaches
  22. 22. forgot context
  23. 23. neglected learner
  24. 24. strategy
  25. 25. intent of learning
  26. 26. created a static infrastructure
  27. 27. tools
  28. 28. process
  29. 29. reflected views of learners and knowledge
  30. 30. where are we?
  31. 31. information growth
  32. 32. different people
  33. 33. different competitors
  34. 34. different rules
  35. 35. BRIC
  36. 36. and yet...
  37. 37. value=ability to function in this space
  38. 38. what do we need?
  39. 39. an infrastructure of adaptability
  40. 40. points of tension retained
  41. 41. not eliminated
  42. 42. diversity
  43. 43. but...
  44. 44. we also need stability
  45. 45. we need approaches
  46. 46. understood at the decision table
  47. 47. web 2.0, blogs, wikis, social media, social networking, enterprise 2.0, podcasts, virtual worlds, participatory culture, adaptive design, Second Life, LMS, LCMS, mashups, RSS, folksonomies, information literacy, web 3D, convergence, remixability, microformats, long tail, vblog, mobile web, perpetual beta, weak ties, network effects, power laws, and on and on and on and on
  48. 48. aren't
  49. 49. What is understood?
  50. 50. strategy
  51. 51. performance
  52. 52. return/investment
  53. 53. global competitiveness
  54. 54. experimentation? ROI?
  55. 55. They don’t
  56. 56. in a cycle of transition
  57. 57. transition=uncertainty
  58. 58. uncertainty=changed metrics
  59. 59. walk in two dimensions
  60. 60. They don’t
  61. 61. how do we make sense?
  62. 62. learning infrastructure
  63. 63. tools
  64. 64. approach
  65. 65. design
  66. 66. view of LOCT
  67. 67. learner
  68. 68. organization
  69. 69. content
  70. 70. technology
  71. 71. structure for tomorrow’s needs
  72. 72. KM? CM? EPSS? JIT?
  73. 73. if it’s learning to do/act/think, it doesn’t matter what you call it
  74. 74. fragmentation=different results
  75. 75. centralization=familiarity and consistency
  76. 76. so...
  77. 77. match task to intent
  78. 78. clear outcomes?
  79. 79. innovate?
  80. 80. enter new market?
  81. 81. different paths lead in different directions
  82. 82. Conceptual Experimental Implementation
  83. 83. Learning needs
  84. 84. one approach
  85. 85. won't work
  86. 86. act in context
  87. 87. They don’t
  88. 88. deep smarts
  89. 89. diverse smarts
  90. 90. a model
  91. 91. Simple Model <ul><li>Analysis and validation </li></ul><ul><li>Ecology and network fostering </li></ul><ul><li>Adaptive learning and knowledge cycle </li></ul><ul><li>System review and validation </li></ul><ul><li>Impacting factors </li></ul>
  92. 92. They don’t
  93. 93. They don’t Domain: Analysis and Validation
  94. 94. They don’t Domain: Ecology and Network Fostering
  95. 95. They don’t Domain: Adaptive Learning and Knowledge Cycle
  96. 96. They don’t Domain: System Review and Validation
  97. 97. Domain: Impacting Factors
  98. 98. They don’t Domain: Impacting Factors
  99. 99. is that even practical?
  100. 100. think holistically
  101. 101. design for complexity
  102. 102. complexity for design
  103. 103. design for diversity
  104. 104. tools
  105. 105. context
  106. 106. learning format
  107. 107. multiplicity
  108. 108. what happens tomorrow? next week?
  109. 109. reflect
  110. 110. evaluate context
  111. 111. experiment aggressively
  112. 112. implement thoughtfully
  113. 113. function in gradients
  114. 114. redesign the design
  115. 115. redesign the structure
  116. 116. [email_address] www.elearnspace.org www.knowingknowledge.com www.complexive.com

×