Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

U.S.NationalAgriculturalLandCoverMonitoring_Mueller.pptx

264

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
264
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • The 2010 CDL was released in January 2011 @ 30 meters resolution.No farmer reported data is revealed, nor can it be derived in the publicly releasable Cropland Data Layer product.
  • The CDL program began in earnest in 1997 with the ability to deliver geospatial content annually to customers who were interested in annual crop land cover updates. Prior to the creation of the CDL product, estimates were provided in tabular format, with pictures/outputs depicting the results.The CDL can be considered a “Census by Satellite”, as it is a comprehensive land use classification covering an entire state, and uses ortho-rectified imagery, to accurately locate and identify field crops.The CDL utilizes a comprehensive and robust archive of AWiFS satellite imagery from the Foreign Ag Service, Landsat TM provided by the U.S. Geological Survey, MODIS dataThe following ground truth is held as confidential: The NASS June Ag Survey and the Farm Service Agency/Common Land Unit. This data is not provided or shared with anyone.The Cropland Data Layer (CDL) is now operational providing in-season estimates for decision support in our NASS Field Offices and Agricultural Statistics Board. Estimates are delivered multiple times during the growing season, helping improve agency estimates. The CDL program strives to cover all NASS speculative program crops of Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Cotton in crop year 2009, providing improved acreage estimates throughout the growing season as more farmer reported and satellite data are utilized. Crop year 2009 marked a first with a national release of the 48 conterminous states. Coverage of additional 21 states was funded by the US EPA.The CDL is a publically releasable crop specific land cover classification that focuses primarily on mapping cultivated fields and providing an update on the agriculture landscape. The 2010 CDL product was released in January 2011, coincident with the release of the new NASS CropScape Geo Portal @ nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape. Users can now interact with the data online.
  • To appreciate the CDL, it helps to zoom in to the field level. Here is Craighead County Arkansas. In this map you can see the rice and soybeans on the left side and the corn and cotton on the right.
  • These are the major inputs into the production of the CDL Program.Medium resolution satellites like Landsat and AWiFS are used as a primary input.The Farm Service Agency – Common Land Unit depicts planted fields that are proportionately sampled as input to the classifier.The National Land Cover Dataset along with the National Elevation, Percent Forest Canopy, Percent Imperviousness are ancillary input layers sampled over the non-ag domain.The NASS June Ag Survey are enumerated segments that are utilized to build acreage estimates using statistical modeling.
  • The first critical component of any remote sensing program is ground truth. NASS is very fortunate to have available administrative data from USDA FSA for agriculture ground truth. Farmers who participate in government programs and crop insurance report their crops to FSA. And starting in 2006 this data is available by geo-location. Non-ag land ground truth comes from USGS National Land Cover Dataset. This identifies, the cities, forests, water and other non-ag land.Agricultural categoriesUse Farm Service Agency (FSA) farmer reported “578” program crop tied to Common Land Unit (CLU) polygon dataEarly in the season this information is thin< 10% representation of cropsMore complete as season evolves20, 30, 40%, or more coverage….Non-agricultural categoriese.g. water, woodlands, grasslands, developed…Ignore the cropland categorized areas of the National Land Cover Data Set (NLCD)Not perfect but needed because not everything is agriculture across the landscape
  • Transcript

    • 1. U.S. National Agricultural Land Cover Monitoring
      Rick Mueller
      USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service
      IEEE IGARSS July 28, 2011
    • 2. Agenda
      Cropland Data Layer (CDL) Intro
      CDL Inputs
      Method
      Accuracy Assessment
      Acreage Estimation
      Summary
    • 3. ~9 billion pixels!
      Inputs:
      Landsat (8601 scenes)
      AWiFS (1194 scenes)
      Released Jan. 10, 2011
      National 30m Product
    • 4. http://nassdata.gmu.edu/CropScape
      Harmonize ALL historical CDL products to standards:
      color scheme, categories, projection, metadata
    • 5. Cropland Data Layer (CDL) Objectives
      • Annually cover major crops for conterminous United States
      • 6. Potential adjusted Ag Census @ .22 acre/pixel scale
      • 7. Deliver in-season remote sensing acreage estimates
      • 8. For June, August, September, and October Official Reports
      • 9. Update planted area/survey variance reduction
      • 10. Reduce respondent burden
      • 11. Basis for crop progress/condition/yield program monitoring
      • 12. Provide timely, accurate, useful estimates
      • 13. Measurable error
      • 14. Unbiased/independent estimator
      • 15. State, District, County
    • 14 states – winter wheat
      14 – corn & soybeans
      15 – rice, cotton & peanuts
      17 – all small grains
      24 – all crops
      27 – operational
      Cropland Data Layer 2010
      in-season production
      @ 56m
      48 states
      post season
      @ 30m
    • 16. 2010 Craighead County Arkansas
    • 17. 2010 Cropland Data Layer Inputs
      Satellite Imagery - AWiFS & Landsat TM
      USDA Farm Service Agency/Common Land Unit
      NLCD & Derivative products
      NASS June Agricultural Survey
    • 18. Ground Truth – Land Cover
      Agriculture Ground Truth
      Non-Agriculture Ground Truth
      Provided by Farm Service Agency
      Identifies known fields and crops
      Divide known fields into 2 sets
      70% used for training software
      30% used for validating results
      U.S. Geological Survey
      National Land Cover Dataset
      Identifies urban infrastructure and non-agriculture land cover
      Forest, grass, water, cities
    • 19. Satellite Data with Farm Service Agency Common Land Unit (CLU) Polygons
    • 20. Satellite Data with Farm Service Agency CLUs Overlay
      Corn -
      Soybean -
      Winter Wheat -
      Alfalfa -
    • 21. Kansas 2010 CDL Input Layers
      AWiFS
      AWiFS
      AWiFS
      TM
      TM
      TM
      TM
      DEM
      Canopy
      Impervious
      MODIS
      Scenes of data actually used: 24 AWiFS, 13 Landsat TM, 2 MODIS NDVI, DEM, Canopy, and Impervious
    • 22. Classification Methodology Overview
      “Stack” Landsat, Landsat-like data, and ancillary data layers within a raster GIS
      Sample spatially through stack from known ground truth from FSA (ag. categories) and NLCD (non-ag. categories)
      “Data-mine” those samples using Boosted Classification Tree Analysis to derive best fitting decision rules
      Apply derived decision rules back to entire input data stack to create full scene classification
      Agricultural
      ground truth
      (via the USDA Farm Service Agency)
      Non-agricultural
      ground truth
      (using the National Land Cover Dataset as a proxy)
      (dependent data)
      Manages and visualizes datasets
      Output “Cropland Data Layer”
      Rulequest See5.0
      Derives decision tree-based
      classification rules
      Imagery stack
      (independent data)
      Generated rule set
    • 23. CDL Accuracy Assessment
      Each classification tested against independent set of ground truth data
      to determine overall and within class accuracies
      Example classification subset
      Example validation subset
    • 24. Accuracy Statistics
      Producer’s Accuracy: relates to the probability that a ground truth pixel will be correctly mapped and measures errors of omission.
      Errors of Omission: occur when a pixel is excluded from the correct category
      User’s Accuracy: indicates the probability that a pixel from the classification actually matches the ground truth data and measures errors of commission
      Errors of Commission: occur when a pixel is included in an incorrect category
    • 25. Regression-based Acreage Estimator
      Acreage not just about counting pixels
      Simple Linear Regression
      Regression used to relate categorized pixel counts to the ground reference data
      (X) – Cropland Data Layer (CDL) classified acres
      (Y) – June Agricultural Survey (JAS) reported acres
      Outlier segment detection - removal from regression analysis
      Using regression results in estimates reduces error rates over using JAS alone
      Estimate 17 crops in 39 states
    • 26. Washington - June
      Winter Wheat – Stratum 11

      Jun – 0.769
    • 27. Washington - September
      Winter Wheat – Stratum 11

      Jun – 0.769
      Sep – 0.883
    • 28. Washington - October
      Winter Wheat – Stratum 11

      Jun – 0.769
      Sep – 0.883
      Oct – 0.890
    • 29. Cropland Data Layer Summary
      Operational Program
      Timely estimate delivery
      Measureable statistical error
      Set national/regional/county acreage estimates
      Components
      AWiFS/Landsat imagery
      Farm Service Agency/Common Land Unit
      USGS NLCD/ancillary layers
      June Agricultural Survey
      Leverage
      CDL program paramount to other NASS geospatial activities
      Partnerships with cooperating agencies critical for success
      Heavy reliance on satellites and information technology
      Distribution
      CropScape Portal
      NRCS Data Gateway
    • 30. Thank you!
      Spatial Analysis Research Section
      USDA/NASS R&D Division
      nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape

    ×