Extraction of Reflectivity fromMicrowave Blackbody Target with   Free-Space Measurements Dazhen Gu, Derek Houtz, James Ran...
Outline•   Motivation•   Theoretical background•   Measurement setup•   Results•   Discussion and Conclusion
Motivation• Microwave imagers and sounders often use  blackbody targets as TB reference• Climate change studies rely on th...
The Non-Ideal Target Problem*    • Calibration targets close to the sensing antenna:         –   linear radiometers need t...
Theoretical Background I• d                  Goal: solving error terms e1, e2, and e3.
Theoretical Background II• Measure empty chamber, offset short (a flat metal plate), and target  in far-field• In addition...
Theoretical Background III• Uncertainty analysis  xm,n = Real or Imginary of e1, e2, e3, or Γmeas, ρ is the correlation fa...
Measurement Setup•   NIST anechoic chamber (usable 400 MHz – 40 GHz)•   K-band pyramidal horn and conical horn•   Rexolite...
Calibration verification• Cross-linked polystyrene (Rexolite) slab
Target Results I• Ripple method approximation: |e2Γo|=(|Γmeas|max-  |Γmeas|min)/2,• e2 disguises the true value of Γo.
Results II• The loss factor is important to correct the reduced intercept  ratio of the radiation pattern as the object mo...
Results III• Reflectivity lower than 40 dB in K-band (18-26 GHz), inline  with the specification of the target.• Negligibl...
Results IV• Uncorrelated uncertainty is higher than correlated  uncertainty.• The uncertainty contributed from Γmeas domin...
Discussion• Conservative uncertainty estimate due to  limited knowledge of VNA measurements on  such low-reflectivity comp...
Conclusion• A free-space calibration technique is  established to characterize blackbody targets.• Simple target ripple me...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

TH4.T03.3ExtractionofReflectivityfromMicrowaveBlackbodyTargetwithFreeSpaceMeasurements1.pdf

256 views
214 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
256
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
17
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

TH4.T03.3ExtractionofReflectivityfromMicrowaveBlackbodyTargetwithFreeSpaceMeasurements1.pdf

  1. 1. Extraction of Reflectivity fromMicrowave Blackbody Target with Free-Space Measurements Dazhen Gu, Derek Houtz, James Randa, and David K. Walker Electromagnetics Division National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, Colorado, USA IGARSS 2011
  2. 2. Outline• Motivation• Theoretical background• Measurement setup• Results• Discussion and Conclusion
  3. 3. Motivation• Microwave imagers and sounders often use blackbody targets as TB reference• Climate change studies rely on the (absolute) accuracy of the TB reference• Reflectivity links to emissivity that quantifies how close the target is to an ideal blackbody.• Calibrated (SI-traceable) TB standards under development at NIST
  4. 4. The Non-Ideal Target Problem* • Calibration targets close to the sensing antenna: – linear radiometers need two standards for calibration. – satellites: cold sky, if possible (far-field) – otherwise: hot & cold targets (near-field) – Scene is always far-field • Near-field targets introduce two general types of error in a total- power radiometer: – Antenna+target affects antenna pattern, directivity (ignore) – at antenna output due to non-ideal target (this work): • Difference in M (mismatch factor) for target, scene • Difference in system F and Gav “ “ “ • utot) 0.1 5.2 K for actual cal. targets measured (0*"Errors Resulting From the Reflectivity of Calibration Targets“ J. Randa, D.K. Walker,A.E. Cox, and R.L. Billinger, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 50 - 58, (2005).
  5. 5. Theoretical Background I• d Goal: solving error terms e1, e2, and e3.
  6. 6. Theoretical Background II• Measure empty chamber, offset short (a flat metal plate), and target in far-field• In addition, a loss factor γ is included to account for the change of the radiation that intercepts the target. Complex plane Imaginary e2ΓO e1 Real
  7. 7. Theoretical Background III• Uncertainty analysis xm,n = Real or Imginary of e1, e2, e3, or Γmeas, ρ is the correlation factor.
  8. 8. Measurement Setup• NIST anechoic chamber (usable 400 MHz – 40 GHz)• K-band pyramidal horn and conical horn• Rexolite (x-linked polystyrene) verification sample• 13-inch target from GSFC (P. Racette) 2.68 (68) 1.1 (28)
  9. 9. Calibration verification• Cross-linked polystyrene (Rexolite) slab
  10. 10. Target Results I• Ripple method approximation: |e2Γo|=(|Γmeas|max- |Γmeas|min)/2,• e2 disguises the true value of Γo.
  11. 11. Results II• The loss factor is important to correct the reduced intercept ratio of the radiation pattern as the object moves along the longitudinal direction. Corrected reflection magnitude of the metal plate
  12. 12. Results III• Reflectivity lower than 40 dB in K-band (18-26 GHz), inline with the specification of the target.• Negligible difference between hot and ambient conditions.• Validated by different hardware and measurement conditions
  13. 13. Results IV• Uncorrelated uncertainty is higher than correlated uncertainty.• The uncertainty contributed from Γmeas dominates due to large derivative factor ∂|Γo|/∂Γmeas.
  14. 14. Discussion• Conservative uncertainty estimate due to limited knowledge of VNA measurements on such low-reflectivity components.• Environment drift somewhat degrades the repeatability.• Mechanical alignment is crucial.• De-embedding method extendable to other frequency bands.
  15. 15. Conclusion• A free-space calibration technique is established to characterize blackbody targets.• Simple target ripple method is not accurate.• The loss factor accounting for the radiation pattern variation is critical to accuracy.• Calibration verified by various methods.• The target under investigation shows close-to- perfect blackbody properties in this f range.• T-GRSS publication out soon.

×