Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
FR4.T05.4.ppt
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

FR4.T05.4.ppt

391

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
391
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. OIL SLICKS DETECTION USING GNSS-R E. Valencia, A. Camps, H. Park , N. Rodríguez-Alvarez, X. Bosch-Lluis and I. Ramos-Perez Remote Sensing Lab, Dept. Teoria del Senyal i Comunicacions, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya and IEEC-CRAE/UPC Tel. +34 93 405 46 64, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: valencia@tsc.upc.edu
  • 2. <ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><li>GNSS-R imaging of the ocean surface </li></ul><ul><li>Oil Slicks modelling </li></ul><ul><li>Simulation results </li></ul><ul><li>Conclusions </li></ul>0. Outline
  • 3. 1. Introduction (1/3) <ul><li>GNSS-R has stood as a powerful remote sensing technique. </li></ul><ul><li>In ocean applications, proposed to retrieve sea surface roughness (scatterometry). </li></ul><ul><li>Current approaches use the delay waveform or the DDM: </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Fit a model tuned by the desired parameter. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Use an empirical direct relationship among the desired parameter and a GNSS-R observable (e.g. scatterometric delay or volume of the normalized DDM). </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>These approaches retrieve a single roughness descriptor for the whole glistening zone (averaged retrieval). </li></ul>
  • 4. 1. Introduction (3/3) <ul><li>Glistening zone may present non-homogeneous sea state conditions. </li></ul><ul><li>DDM can be regarded as a blurred image of the scattering coefficient distribution in the Delay-Doppler (DD) domain. </li></ul><ul><li>Proposal: </li></ul><ul><li>Application: Oil slicks detection using GNSS-R. </li></ul><ul><li>Added value to other existing sensors ( SAR, optical imagers, microwave radiometers, etc. ) </li></ul><ul><li>Completeness of the spectral signature. </li></ul><ul><li>A method to retrieve σ 0 from measured DDMs is presented and evaluated. </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ Use the Delay-Doppler Map to retrieve the </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>scattering coefficient distribution over the observed surface” </li></ul></ul></ul>
  • 5. <ul><li>A method for using GNSS-R measurements to retrieve the scattering coefficient distribution over the ocean has been recently proposed in: </li></ul><ul><li>E. Valencia, A. Camps, et al. </li></ul><ul><li>“ Ocean surface’s scattering coefficient retrieval </li></ul><ul><li>by Delay-Doppler Map inversion,” </li></ul><ul><li>IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, July 2011. </li></ul><ul><li>This method is based on the inversion of the measured DDM expressed as the 2D convolution in the delay-Doppler (DD) domain of the WAF with a simple function (computationally inexpensive): </li></ul>2. GNSS-R imaging of the ocean surface (1/4)
  • 6. <ul><li>The first step to retrieve σ 0 is to remove the WAF effects on the measured DDM by deconvolution (conceptually) : </li></ul><ul><li>Inverse filter not suitable due to noise amplification effects. </li></ul><ul><li>Many deconvolution methods available in the image processing literature. </li></ul><ul><li>Deconvolution is the key step of the proposed method. </li></ul>2. GNSS-R imaging of the ocean surface (2/4)
  • 7. <ul><li>After deconvolution, the scattering coefficient distribution can be retrieved from Σ by simple operations using known terms. </li></ul><ul><li>However, 2 xy coordinates contribute to each DD point. </li></ul><ul><li>2 ambiguous spatial regions. </li></ul><ul><li>Function Σ is a linear combination of both regions’ contributions. </li></ul><ul><li>Each region has an associated Jacobian function: J 1 and J 2 . </li></ul><ul><li>Ambiguity has to be resolved, presented approach based on the measurement setup. </li></ul><ul><li>Other approaches are possible to resolve the ambiguity. </li></ul>2. GNSS-R imaging of the ocean surface (3/4)
  • 8. <ul><li>Spatial filtering of only one of the ambiguous zones is proposed by antenna beam pointing away from the specular point . </li></ul><ul><li>SAR-like setup. </li></ul><ul><li>A beam-forming system is needed </li></ul><ul><ul><li>planned in future missions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(PARIS-IoD). </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Using this spatial filtering scheme, </li></ul><ul><li>Σ is only contributed by a single space </li></ul><ul><li>region with an associated Jacobian. </li></ul><ul><li>At this point σ 0 in the DD domain can be derived: </li></ul><ul><li>The final distribution over the xy surface domain is obtained by direct coordinates correspondence: </li></ul>2. GNSS-R imaging of the ocean surface (4/4)
  • 9. Corresponding σ 0 distribution of an ocean surface with an homogeneous 12 m/s wind speed and oil slick presence 3. Oil Slicks modelling <ul><li>Mean Squared Slopes modelled by the relationships with the wind speed derived by Cox and Munk, 1954. </li></ul><ul><li>After applying the empirical modification proposed by Katzberg et al. 2006 , these MSS have been used to compute the corresponding σ 0 distribution (KA-GO). </li></ul><ul><li>The DDM is computed by extending to the Doppler domain the Zavorotny and Voronovich, 2000 model for the waveform. </li></ul>
  • 10. 4. Simulation results (1/4) <ul><li>A first evaluation of the method has been performed by setting a LEO receiver simple scenario (without loss of generality). </li></ul><ul><li>Hardware effects not considered and the PARIS-IoD antenna pattern’s parameters have been used (D = 23 dBi, HPBW = 35º). </li></ul>Iso-range and iso-Doppler lines Antenna pattern projection on the observed surface Specular point: ( x,y ) = (0,0) Receiver height 700 km Receiver velocity (Vty) 5000 m/s Transmitter velocity (Vty) 3000 m/s Elevation angle 90º (nadir reflection) Observation surface x direction [0 60] km Observation surface y direction [-60 60] km Maximum considered delay (Δτ) 10 chips (C/A code) Maximum considered Doppler shift (ΔfD) [-2500 2500] Hz Coherent/incoherent integration times 10 ms / 1 s
  • 11. <ul><li>With the defined scenario and scattering coefficient distribution, a reference DDM xy has been computed by the classical double integration over the surface xy domain. </li></ul><ul><li>As in Valencia et al. 2011 , noise has been added with a SNR similar to that of available space measurements (UK-DMC). </li></ul>4. Simulation results (2/4)
  • 12. <ul><li>A CLS frequency-based method has been used for deconvolution: </li></ul><ul><li>P : Fourier transform of the smoothing criterion function. </li></ul><ul><li>Trade-off definition/noise by tuning the γ parameter. </li></ul><ul><li>After deconvolution, an estimation of the Σ ( Δ τ , Δ f D ) is obtained. </li></ul><ul><li>The σ 0 distribution in the DD domain is derived by applying the appropriate compensation factors (Jacobian term, antenna pattern, propagation factors, etc.). </li></ul><ul><li>The last step of the method is to map from the DD to xy domain by direct coordinates correspondence (spatial ambiguity overcome by spatial filtering in the measurement). </li></ul>4. Simulation results (3/4)
  • 13. σ 0 retrieved in the xy domain Error map w.r.t. the input distribution <ul><li>Scattering coefficient distribution retrieved with low error. </li></ul><ul><li>Oil slick is clearly detected. </li></ul><ul><li>Main error due to deconvolution artifacts. </li></ul><ul><li>Deconvolution process identified as the key step of the proposed method. </li></ul>4. Simulation results (4/4)
  • 14. 5. Conclusions <ul><li>GNSS-R powerful remote sensing technique suitable for ocean scatterometry. </li></ul><ul><li>Ocean σ 0 imaging from GNSS-R measurements proposed, with application to oil slicks detection. </li></ul><ul><li>DDM deconvolution to σ 0 mapping within the glistening zone: </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Antenna beam steering to eliminate the mapping ambiguity. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>WAF deconvolution needed. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Compensation for the Jacobian and other known terms. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Deconvolution process identified as the key step of the method and further work is required. </li></ul><ul><li>Proposed method successfully evaluated with a simulation example for a LEO receiver, including noise. </li></ul><ul><li>The presence of an oil slick on an homogeneous 12 m/s wind speed ocean surface is clearly observable in the retrieved image. </li></ul>
  • 15. Thank you for your attention

×