Sexual, racial and other forms of harassment


Published on

A presentation for Human Resource professionals and business owners on harassment. Will be presenting this at a seminar tomorrow at the Crowne Plaza in White Plains.

Published in: Business, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Sexual, racial and other forms of harassment

  1. 1. Sexual, Racial and Other Forms of Harassment Fundamentals of Employment Law Dr. Greg Chartier, The Office of GJ Chartier 914-548-1689, 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 1
  2. 2. Introduction  Greg Chartier ◦ 914-548-1689 ◦ ◦ 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 2
  3. 3. Why are we conducting this program?  Basic objectives when dealing with the issue of harassment: ◦ The ultimate goal is to prevent occurrences of harassment. ◦ We need to encourage employees to report incidents ◦ Shield the company from liability and legal action ◦ Help you and your employees do a better job providing services to the company. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 3
  4. 4. • Classification of people as male or female • Biological and physiological characteristics that define men and women Sex • Socially constructed roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women • Also, the perception by others of a person’s appearance, behavior, or physical characteristics Gender • If birth-assigned sex and internal sense of gender identity do not match • Tendencies to vary from culturally conventional gender roles Transgender • Country of one’s birth or of one's ancestors' birth— even those that no longer exist • May be interchanged with “ethnicity,” although an “ethnic group” can refer to religion or color as well as country of one’s ancestry National origin Terminology The Office of GJ Chartier 2-4
  5. 5. National Origin • Because of individual’s, or his/her ancestor’s, place of origin or because individual has physical, cultural, or linguistic characteristics of a national origin group Race • Because individual is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race Color • Because of skin color Discrimination
  6. 6. Legal Framework  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ◦ Prohibits discrimination against protected classes. ◦ Makes it unlawful to deny employment opportunities, training, or career advancement to protected classes. ◦ As amended, prohibits discrimination because of pregnancy, childbirth, or related conditions. ◦ Prohibits sexual harassment. ◦ Defines harassment and discrimination 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 6
  7. 7. Legal Framework  Protected Characteristics: ◦ Race, color, creed, age, national origin, alienage or citizenship status, gender (including gender identity), sexual orientation, disability (or perceived disability), marital status, partnership status, arrest or conviction records, genetic predisposition, military status, status as the victim of domestic violence, stalking or sex crimes. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 7
  8. 8. What is Harassment?  Harassment is a wide range of offensive behaviors. It is usually intended to disturb or upset someone and it is usually repetitive.  Legally, it is intentional behavior that is threatening or disturbing.  While some kinds of harassment seems to be simple, it is all unacceptable behavior. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 8
  9. 9. Types of Harassment  Bullying. Physical or psychological harassing behavior directed at one individual by one or a group of people.  Psychological harassment. Humiliating, intimidating or abusive behavior..  Racial harassment. Targeting an individual because of their race or ethnicity. Can include words, deeds and actions directed at the individual. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 9
  10. 10. Types of Harassment  Stalking. Intruding on someone’s privacy by following or through surveillance when the victim fears for her safety.  Hazing. Persecute deliberately in a calculated, planned way as part of an initiation rite.  Electronic harassment or cyber stalking. Using electronics to stalk or follow. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 10
  11. 11. What’s Discrimination?  Prejudicial treatment of someone due to their membership in a certain group. Actual behavior towards an individual or group through excluding or restricting them from opportunities.  You do not need to be “harmed” in order to be discriminated against. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 11
  12. 12. Types of Discrimination  Disparate treatment ◦ Treating protected classes differently than other employees or evaluating them by different standards. Intentional discrimination.  Adverse or disparate impact ◦ Applying rules that have a negative effect on protected classes to all employees. Accidental discrimination.  Perpetuating past discrimination. ◦ Using employee referral programs that maintain racial inequity. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 12
  13. 13. What is Sexual Harassment?  Legal Definition: ◦ Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, when:  A term of employment  Basis for employment decisions  Creating a “hostile” environment ◦ Sexual harassment is not about sex, it’s about power. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 13
  14. 14. Sexual Harassment Employee must give in to sexual demands and forfeit an economic benefit (job or raise). 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 14 Quid pro quo Hostile environment Sexual or discriminatory conduct creates a threatening or abusive work environment.
  15. 15. What is Sexual Harassment?  Elements of Sexual Harassment ◦ Quid Pro Quo (this for that)  Conditioning job benefits or employment on submission to sexual demands by a supervisor is always and everyday sexual harassment.  In all cases of quid pro quo harassment, the employer is responsible for allowing the harassment to take place, even if we didn’t know about it. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 15
  16. 16. Quid Pro Quo Harassment  Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (1998) ◦ A female lifeguard worked for the city for 10 years. She alleged that she and other females were subject to harassment from their supervisors. There was a policy in place, but the supervisors had never seen it. ◦ The court distinguished between harassment that results in tangible employment action and harassment that does not. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 16
  17. 17. Vicarious Liability  Employers are liable for discriminatory actions by their employees.  Employers must intervene and end harassment through intervention or discipline.  Employees should utilize preventive and corrective action opportunities. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 17
  18. 18. What is Sexual Harassment?  Elements of Sexual Harassment ◦ Hostile Work Environment  Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other verbal or physical conduct can create an environment that is “hostile.”  Not every sexual joke or romantic invitation will be sexual harassment. It depends on some conditions: 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 18
  19. 19. What is Sexual Harassment?  Unwelcomeness: A consensual relationship cannot lead to sexual harassment.  Advances must be unwelcome and this unwelcomeness must be communicated, in some way.  A supervisor’s preferential treatment of an employee does not create harassment, except in California. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 19
  20. 20. Unwelcomeness  Koster v. Chase Manhattan Bank ◦ Employee begins consensual, sexual relationship with boss. She is promoted and given larger increases. Her boss is transferred and her new boss realizes she is not qualified to do job she is in. She receives disciplinary action and resigns. Sues, stating sexual harassment. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 20
  21. 21. Reasonable Woman Standard  Harris v. Forklift Systems (1993)  Reasonable Woman Standard. What would a “reasonable woman” find hostile in the workplace?  This means that, harassment is in the “eye of the beholder” not in the harasser. ◦ “I didn’t mean anything by it” doesn’t count. ◦ “I didn’t intend it to be harassing” doesn’t count. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 21
  22. 22. What are we responsible for?  We will always be responsible for sexual harassment that we knew about and did not take prompt and effective action. ◦ “I don’t want anyone to know.”  Even if we didn’t know about it, it is our responsibility to watch and report inappropriate behavior when we see it. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 22
  23. 23. What are we responsible for?  Hostile environment depends on two possibilities: ◦ Knew or should have known. Actual knowledge (seen, heard, told) or constructive knowledge (environmental harassment). Centerfolds. ◦ Failure to take remedial action. Generally, we may not be responsible if we take prompt and appropriate remedial action. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 23
  24. 24. Fairness Issues  Reverse discrimination. Temporary preference to protected classes in order to correct the inequities of the past. Often used in colleges to select applicants.  Quota vs. merit hiring. Generally not allowed as it is basically discriminatory.  Bona fide occupational qualification. Carefully scrutinized and limited in nature. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 24
  25. 25. Fairness Issues  Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Colleges and universities can legitimately consider race as one of the factors in the admissions process.  Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger (2003). Justified the use of race in university admissions as long as it is “narrowly” tailored.  Taxman v. Board of Education Piscataway (1993). “A nonremedial affirmative action plan cannot form the basis for deviating from Title VII.”  Ricci v. DeStefano (2009). 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 25
  26. 26. Fraternization  What is Fraternization?  Behavior that crosses the line, legally, morally and professionally.  We use it to explain inappropriate, unprofessional, unethical or unacceptable behavior. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 26
  27. 27. Fraternization  We keep ourselves separate in order to maintain our integrity and the ability to perform our job.  Relations and activities that are forbidden include: ◦ Romantic or sexual relations with our customers ◦ Gambling ◦ Business relationships with our customers ◦ Excessive familiarity with our customers ◦ Disrespect of authority 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 27
  28. 28. EEOC’s Strategic Enforcement Plan  Eliminating barriers in recruitment and hiring. ◦ Target class-based practices that discriminate against racial, ethnic and religious groups, older workers, women and people with disabilities.  Protecting immigrant, migrant and other vulnerable workers. ◦ Target disparate pay, job segregation, harassment, trafficking and discriminatory policies affecting vulnerable workers. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 28
  29. 29. EEOC’s Strategic Enforcement Plan  Addressing emerging and developing issues. ◦ Target emerging issues; gay, lesbian, transgender issues, demographic changes, new legislation.  Enforcing equal pay laws. ◦ Target compensation systems that discriminate based on gender. ◦ Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (2009), creates a rolling or open time frame for filing wage discrimination claims. 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 29
  30. 30. National Labor Relations Board  Banner Health System (2012). ◦ Using a “blanket” approach of “maintaining and applying a rule prohibiting employees from discussing ongoing investigations of employee misconduct” interfered with Section 7 Rights. ◦ Employer’s “generalized concern with protecting the integrity of investigations is insufficient to outweigh Section 7 Rights.” ◦ Can still conduct investigations “to the extent possible.” 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 30
  31. 31. National Labor Relations Board  Ensure references to harassment are focused on types of harassment prohibited by anti-discrimination laws.  A policy that prohibits all forms of harassing, annoying or disrespectful language and conduct is too broad.  Employees have the right to oppose employer policies but have no right to do so in a “menacing manner.” 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 31
  32. 32. Questions/Comments? 7/9/2013 The Office of GJ Chartier 32