Review of Local Landscape Designations, Edinburgh - Presentation Transcript
Reviewing Edinburgh’s Landscape Designations Presentation and discussion Susanne Underwood and Carol Anderson
Overview
Background
Study aims
Detailed requirements
Defining the scope of the work
Undertaking the study
The Edinburgh Landscape Character Assessment
Identifying Edinburgh’s candidate Special Landscape Areas
Findings
Summary of change proposed
Statements of Importance
Policy recommendations
Consultation
Next steps
Background
Study aims:
To prepare a landscape character assessment for City of Edinburgh
To review local landscape designations in line with SNH and HS guidance
Background
Detailed requirements:
Inclusion of open spaces within and adjacent to the city
Consideration of cross boundary issues
Consideration of identified objectives set out in project brief for evaluating local landscape designations
Description of landscape character types and areas
Stakeholder involvement
Use of historic land use assessment to inform study
Background
Policy Background
Policy purpose of SLA designation
What is the policy purpose of SLA designation?
As an accolade
Is it a landscape which can be celebrated as part of Edinburgh’s identity?
As a means to focus policies and objectives
Is this a landscape which needs to be protected?
As a tool for management
Does this area need greater landscape management?
Undertaking the Study
The Edinburgh Landscape Character Assessment
Purpose:
To undertake a landscape character assessment of landscape within City of Edinburgh Council including open spaces and the peri urban environment
Provide information to understand how Edinburgh’s landscape character may be conserved, enhanced or restructured as appropriate.
Provides a baseline to enable a systematic review of local landscape designations
Undertaking the Study
Edinburgh landscape character assessment
15 landscape character types
75 landscape character areas
Description and summary of key characteristics
Landscape assessment against set criteria
Typicality
Rarity/uniqueness
Prominence
Scenic qualities
Enjoyment
Culture
Naturalness
Undertaking the Study Edinburgh Landscape Character Types and Areas
Undertaking the Study
Identifying Edinburgh’s candidate Special Landscape Areas
Using the baseline of the landscape descriptions in the landscape character assessment;
The character and qualities of the landscape are assessed according to agreed criteria
Undertaking the study
SLA Designation Criteria
Edinburgh distinctiveness (weighted)
Relative merit
Scenic quality (weighted)
Enjoyment (weighted)
Culture
Naturalness
Geology and geomorphology
Variations in quality informs boundary considerations (not scored)
Association with adjoining character areas
Importance of Connectivity
Edinburgh specific qualities
Contribution to historic core
Contribution to setting of Edinburgh
Key views
Undertaking the study
SLA methodology
The ratings of high, medium or low from the evaluation tables are converted to numeric scores to allow ranking of all areas in relation to the designation criteria
The candidate landscapes are evaluated for their value for designation and in terms of practical considerations, support from CEC and the community, cross boundary issues and the candidate Special Landscape Areas are refined and boundaries identified.
Undertaking the study
Discussion
Findings
Findings
Gains:
Coastal edge at Crammond and South Queensferry
Dundas (wider extent)
Craigie Hill
Upper Almond
Ratho Hills
Gogar (wider extent)
Lower Pentland slopes above Currie and Balerno
Water of Leith (3 sections)
Craigmillar Castle
The Drum
Edmonstone
Princes Street Gardens
Castle Rock
Inverleith Park and the Royal Botanic Gardens
Calton Hill
Findings
Losses:
Silverknowes golf course
Barnton golf course
Davidson’s Mains (north of Corstorphine Hill)
Lennie Hill and flanking farmland at Cammo
Carmel Hill and Humbie Reservoir
Newliston
Clifton School grounds
Dalmahoy
Ratho golf course
Dreghorn polo fields
Findings
Statements of Importance
Structure and content:
Location and boundaries
OS grid reference
Landscape character areas within cSLA
Extent (ha)
Description of landscape characteristics and qualities
Potential pressures upon landscape integrity
Enhancement potential
Other designations/interests
Map
Findings
Boundaries
Boundaries for consultation were based on landscape character area boundaries
Subsequent refinement is required to ensure SLA boundaries are robust and logical
Findings
Boundary decision rules
Identify where key characteristics of the landscape change and look to nearest physical boundary
Where there are variations in quality within a LCA move inwards from areas of lower quality
Consider the role of the physical relationship of the candidate area in relation to quality of other adjacent LCAs and in creating a ‘logical’ and cohesive area for designation .
Findings
Planning policy context
Reviewed National Landscape Policy
Local Planning Policy within Edinburgh and neighbouring authorities
Model policy
Findings
Other policy protection
Edinburgh World Heritage Site
Gardens and Designed Landscapes
Conservation areas
Green Belt
Recreation
Nature Conservation
Findings
Planning Policy recommendation:
Generic SLA protection policy , referring to interpretation of policy within context of the information presented in each Statement of Importance
Landscape character protection policy
Acknowledgement of links to other relevant policy (GDL, Conservation Areas, recreational areas etc.)
Potential role for SPG
Findings
Discussion
Summary of Consultation findings
Summary of consultation findings
External comments
Urban edge boundaries will reflect settlement boundaries, this may include areas of land in private ownership
Support protection from development provided by designation
No guidance provided on policy status of ‘de-designated’ land
Comment on lack of comprehensive approach across SESplan area
Comment on supposed lack of conformity with Guidance on Local Landscape Designations
Comment on inclusion of all of Corstorphine Hill, Mortonhall policies (included through association with Braid Hills), western flanks of Pentlands (as part of Pentland Hills SLA), whole of The Drum due to variations in quality and Gogar as an SLA
Summary of consultation findings
Internal comments:
Relationship of Pentland Hills SLA with PHRP boundary
0 comments
Post a comment