• Save
Mike luz on public private partnerships for good governance
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Mike luz on public private partnerships for good governance

on

  • 892 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
892
Views on SlideShare
892
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Mike luz on public private partnerships for good governance Mike luz on public private partnerships for good governance Presentation Transcript

    • Public-Private Partnershipsfor Good GovernanceLocal Government LevelJ. M. LUZAssociate Dean, Center for Development Management,Asian Institute of ManagementPanibagong Paraan for Good Government5 November 2009
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level Outline  Key Questions  Context  Framework of Analysis  Modalities of Participation  Issues  The Future: Opportunities for Local Governments
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level Key Questions  In the face of limited public resources, how to finance and provide for the growing demand (at the LGU level) for more infrastructure, services?  What options exist that could deliver infrastructure or services in a cost-effective manner?  How to finance and support the needed investment?
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level Thesis  Private-Public Partnerships provide a variety of options  Options range from:  Increasing revenues from the private sector for needed investment  Providing in-kind services that augments Local Government  Service contracting  Private spending for identified infrastructure or service
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level The Context: Local Government  Range from First to Sixth Class  LGUs largely dependent on IRA as source of revenues  The lower the income class, the more dependent on IRA  Increasing share of LGU taxes…but never enough to cover demand for more services
    • Public-Private Partnership in Basic Education Service Delivery:Provisioning and Funding Some Issues in Local Governance  Devolution  service delivery  Health  Social welfare  Agriculture  Environment  More demand for local cost-sharing  Education (Local School Board, Special Education Fund)  Disasters  More competition for National Government resources  For share of projects  For timely release of IRA
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level A Response: Private-Public Partnerships  Partnerships are born out of a convergence of interests  To address growing needs or demands of constituent publics  Hypothesis: The Whole (e.g. Partnerships) > sum of the parts (e.g. Sectors’ contribution)  Traditional responses inadequate viz heightened demand or new need  Government not in a position to respond adequately  Markets not able to address needs
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level Private-Public Partnerships: Framework (Organizing Concepts)  The ability of existing institutions (i.e. LGU) to address demand or need Versus  Degree of need or demand  What types of partnerships are needed?
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level Organizing Concepts SUPPLY-SIDE Ability of institutions to deliver STRONG LIMITED DEMAND-SIDE I. Partnership as an II. Partnership Arrangement as a System Heightened Response Effective Demand III. Partnership to strengthen an IV. Partnership existing as a new New or Emerging institution Institution Need articulated Capacity Issues Capability Issues Can institution x deliver enough? Is Institution x able to deliver at all?
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level Organizing Concepts SUPPLY-SIDE Ability of institutions to deliver STRONG LIMITED DEMAND-SIDE II. I. Partnership as Partnership an Arrangement Heightened as a System Effective Demand Response III. Partnership to strengthen an IV. Partnership existing as a new New or Emerging institution Institution Need articulated Capacity Issues Capability Issues Can institution x deliver enough? Is Institution x able to deliver at all?
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government LevelOrganizing Concepts SUPPLY-SIDE Ability of institutions to deliver STRONG LIMITED DEMAND-SIDE I. Partnership as II. Partnership New or Heightened an Arrangement as a System Effective Demand Response III. Partnership to strengthen IV. Partnership an existing as a new New or Emerging Institution Need articulated institution Capacity Issues Capability Issues Can institution x deliver enough? Is Institution x able to deliver at all?
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government LevelOrganizing Concepts SUPPLY-SIDE Ability of institutions to deliver STRONG LIMITED DEMAND-SIDE I. Partnership as II. Partnership New or Heightened an Arrangement as a System Effective Demand Response III. Partnership IV. to strengthen an existing Partnership New or Emerging institution as a new Need articulated Institution Capacity Issues Capability Issues Can institution x deliver enough? Is Institution x able to deliver at all?
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level Modalities of Participation  To go beyond mere Government spending (Example: Basic Education)  Increasing revenues for public education (from Non- Government participation)  Providing in-kind services that augments Government spending in education  Service contracting  Increased private spending for education (private education)
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level 1. Increase Revenues for Public Education  Objective: Raise revenues for public education (beyond the national budget)  From Private Sector: Corporate philanthropy through “Adopt-a-School” mechanism  Tax incentives provided by law  From Local Governments: Special Education Fund  1% of real estate taxes collected by LGUs  Through Local School Boards (chaired by the Governor, Mayor)
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level 1. Increase Revenues for Public Education  Bold Ideas: Raise revenues for public education through market mechanisms  Education bond issue  Securitization of school building construction  Securitization of the voucher system
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level 2. Providing in-kind services to augment Government spending in education  Brigada Eskwela  National Schools Maintenance Week (May)  Community voluntarism  minor repair and maintenance of schools (preparatory to school opening)  2003 [2006]  12,533 public schools involved [29,215 schools)  832,000+ volunteer man-days [4.0 million m/days]  Total value of repairs = Estimated P392 Million [P2.0 Billion]
    • Public-Private Partnership in Basic Education Service Delivery:Provisioning and Funding 2. Providing in-kind services to augment Government spending in education  Textbook Count  National Textbook Delivery Program (June-November)  NGO involvement in monitoring deliveries of textbooks  In 2003  30,000+ deliveries (schools and district offices)  37 million textbooks
    • Public-Private Partnership in Basic Education Service Delivery:Provisioning and Funding 2. Providing in-kind services to augment Government spending in education  Textbook Count: Summary of Findings on Deficient Deliveries by Elementary Schools District (Quantity) Zone # Districts # with Delivery % Remarks Errors 3 552 78 14.13 Region VIII (74) 4 538 30 5.58 Region XII (10) 1 500 8 1.60 2 491 15 3.05 NCR (12); Pasig- San Juan (4/4) TOTAL 2,081 125 6.00
    • Public-Private Partnership in Basic Education Service Delivery:Provisioning and Funding 2. Providing in-kind services to augment Government spending in education  PTCA Involvement  Parent-Teacher-Community Associations  Local stakeholders  School feeding programs  Pay for school security, janitorial, utilities  “Adopt-a-School” Corporate Involvement  Corporate tie-ups for facilities improvement  Manila Electric Company  audit of electricals in schools  Manila Water Company  audit of school water systems
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level 3. Service contracting  Government Assistance to Teachers and Students in Private Education (GASTPE)  Voucher-type program  Shift enrolment from public high schools to private high schools  Education Service Contracting scheme (with a subsidy)  For 2004-2005:  325,000 students  1600 private high schools contracted  P1.5 Billion  Managed by the Fund for Assistance to Private Education (FAPE, NGO)
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level 3. Service contracting  Proposals:  Pre-school education service contracting (expansion of the pilot project)  ESC for Madaris Education (Madrasah schools) in Mindanao
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level 4. Private spending for education (private education)  Regulation of private schools  Standards  Consumer protection  As an alternative or option for parents  Possibilities for PPPS  Involvement of private educators in governance  Opening Departmental programs to private schools (teacher training, Educators’ Congress, professional associations)  Opening LSB funding for private education
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level Example: Cost effectiveness of ESC (Education Service Contracting) Scheme  Constructing (traditional DepED solution)…  For every 50 students = 1 classroom = P500,000  For every class = 1.25 teachers = P300,000/year  For every class = 5 subjects x 1 textbook x P75 x 50 = P18,750  For every 50 students = 50 desks x P1000 = P50,000  For every student = P250 in MOOE/year (average) = P12,500  Total = P833,750 start up + P312,500 recurring cost  …versus contracting (ESC)  P6000/year (SY 2009-2010) x 50 = P300,000
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level If possible for Education, why not for other services, needs? 1. Health: Private medical providers  school health as primary target (preventive)  Private hospitals/clinics + LGU health card 2. Garbage collection and recycling 3. Street maintenance (especially in town or city center, business district) by local businesses 4. Disaster response (Local business)  Preparedness (what other evacuation centers available?)  Mitigation (reduce risks)
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level The Future: Opportunities 1. Water  Manila: Assets owned by MWSS; water and sewerage services privatized to Manila Water and Maynilad  Privatize the management of the local water district (If regulated well, the town/city can realize greater efficiencies)  Not a private enterprise, but a public-private partnership 2. Garbage landfill sites  Collection  Disposal  Recycling (business opportunity ) 3. Electricity cooperative  Non-governmental, but many are run like government agencies
    • Public-Private Partnership for Good GovernanceLocal Government Level The Future: Opportunities The KEY: Proper Regulation  Standards + enforcement  Protection of constituents (from a monopoly)  Ensure a stable environment to operate as a partnership The DRIVER: Rules and regulations  Local chief executive is critical, but not the key to success  Partnerships must be sustainable over time (e.g. beyond 3 year terms)
    • Public-Private Partnershipsfor Good GovernanceLocal Government LevelJ. M. LUZAssociate Dean, Center for Development Management,Asian Institute of ManagementPanibagong Paraan for Good Government5 November 2009