It’s a rather a daunting proposition having to do an inaugural as it is difficult to know how to pitch it and it feels as if you are leaving your research philosophy very much bear. Also should one describe some in depth research or a broad overview? I have decided to opt for the latter. What I hope to do in this talk is three things. Firstly, I hope I can share with you my passion for this area of research and show you why I think it is such an exciting area to be working in. Secondly, I hope to be able to demonstrate why this is an important area, highlighting ways in which it is impacting on policy and practice. Thirdly, I would like to give you a snapshot of some of my current research interests.
JISC LADIE project Learning Design In Education - Presentation Transcript
JISC LADIE project Learning Activity Design in Education Gráinne Conole University of Southampton Email: g.c.conole@soton.ac.uk UNFOLD meeting,University of Braga 15 th June 2005
Partners
Main partners
University of Southampton
University of Dundee
Intrallect Ltd
Associates
CPCET – Consortium for Post-Compulsory Education and Training
SIESWE, Scottish Institute for Excellence in Social Work Education
LAMS International
RELOAD
Open Universiteit Nederland
Icodeon Software
CETIS
Aim
To consider the design, construction and execution of learning activity in a way that can be used and shared by multiple institutions and learners
To include learning activity management, sequencing of learning content within a single activity, use of interoperable learning and content packaging from a teacher's perspective
Focus
To develop a series of learning activity use cases from both a pedagogical and technical perspective
Abstraction of the services needed to support these use cases
Reference model
Will support two distinct stages
Learning Activity Authoring
including the design and construction of learning activities and the discovery, specification, sequencing and packaging of content
Learning Activity Realisation
including construction of the environment in which learning activities are to take place and execution of the learning activities themselves
Activities
Top-down approach
To develop and test a method of gathering learning activity use cases from teachers and provide simple use cases
Iteration 1: Bottom-up approach
To establish a framework for creating the reference model and its implementations
Iteration 2: Top-down approach
To gather and analyse a complete set of use cases to feed into the final iteration
Iteration 3: Top-down approach
To compare the reference model and its implementation with teachers expectations and perform a gap analysis
Iteration 4: Bottom-up approach
To produce a reference model for the domain and a demonstrable implementation
Process
Based on two tried approaches
Intrallect use case methodology
DialogPlus learning design taxonomy
Series of workshops with practitioners
Development of use cases
Evaluation of approach
Mapping to the e-learning framework
What is a use case?
A use case is a way of capturing the expected behaviour of a system when a person uses the system to achieve a specific goal
The use case is a means of communication between people
It should be simple, readable text
Why use cases?
Defines the behaviour of a system without considering its architecture
Easy to understand and communicate
Can be used to
distil requirements of a system
test that a constructed system meets the use for which it was intended
Use Case Summary
Procedure
Consider possible primary actors (the person or system that wishes to perform an action)
Consider an activity to model
Write one sentence overview of use case
Example
A lecturer wishes to make his/her research results freely available but wants to be acknowledged if sections are copied and redistributed
How to write a use case
Capture a summary use case
an overview in a sentence
Identify actors and their goals
actors can be people, systems, organisations
stakeholders and their interests
Write success scenario as steps
Define exceptions to each step
Use case template
Authors
Use Case Summary
Primary Actor ( and goal)
Other Actors (and goals)
Stakeholders and Interests
Main Success Scenario
Extensions
Example
Use Case Summary
A lecturer wishes to make his/her research results freely available but wants to be acknowledged if sections are copied and redistributed
Primary and other Actors (and their goals)
Researcher (primary)
To make research results widely available
Repository
To store research results and make it possible for them to be found
User
To discover and use research results
Example (Continued)
Stakeholders and Interests
Researcher’s Institution
Institution would also like to be acknowledged for material. Institution would like to take responsibility for archiving and cataloguing of publication.
Person making use of material
Would have to acknowledge the author in a specified way
Example (Continued)
Main Success Scenario
Researcher “publishes” material in the institution’s e-prints repository
Selects the rights under which the material can be used from a set of possible licences proposed by the institution
Includes metadata (title, description, keywords)
Metadata is quality-controlled by a library cataloguer and the object is classified and given a unique reference identifier
The library system automatically archives the material…..
Example (Continued)
Extensions
Researcher may publish the material by making it available on a personal or departmental web page
Researcher could pass details of URL to librarian who catalogues web-based resources
Researcher may produce an updated version of the publication and not publish it through the same route
Institution may not have an agreed set of licences from which the researcher can select what is appropriate
Learning activity toolkit
Gap between the
potential of the technologies
(confusion over how they can be used)
and
application of good pedagogical principles
(confusion over which models to use)
Plethora of tools and resources Enormous potential but underused Wealth of knowledge about learning Didactic/behaviourists models predominate
Experiential Practicing Mimicking Experiencing Productive Creating Producing Writing Drawing Composing Synthesising Communicative Discussing Presenting Debating Adaptive Modelling Simulation Info Handling Gathering Ordering Classifying Selecting Analysing Manipulating Not assessed Diagnostic Formative Summative Adaptive simulation modelling virtual worlds Communicative email disn. boards lists commentary chat Productive s/sheet d/base Narrative text video audio Web page image Interactive engines libraries Indiv learner Group leader Coach Participant Mentor Supervisor Rapporteur Facilitator Deliverer Pair person Presenter Peer assessor Moderator 1 – many Group based Class based 1-1 to S Individual Artefact Assignment Brainstorming Buzz words Dissertation Drill & practice Essay Exercise Fishbowl Ice breaker MCQ Mindmaps Pair dialogues Performance Portfolio Product Q and A Resource-based Role play Rounds Short answer Snowball Debate Test Voting Assimilative Reading Viewing Listening Assessment Tools & Resources Roles Interaction Technique Type Types of learning activities
Stakeholder benefits
Teachers
Supports tutors through the process of design, construction and integration of online and face-to-face activities
Reference model will provide a common language for sharing learning activities between teachers
Educational technologists
Work with teachers to create learning environments for students
Reference model will be designed both from the pedagogical viewpoint (the top-down approach) and from the technical viewpoint (the bottom-up approach) it will bridge the gap between teachers and “techies”
Technology providers
Need to produce technical solutions which meet the needs of teachers and students
Reference model will provide these requirements in a form that will allow technology providers to abstract the services
Reference model will either confirm that existing specifications are adequate or it will identify gaps in specifications and highlight areas for further specification work
JISC LADIE project Learning Activity Design in Education Gráinne Conole University of Southampton Email: g.c.conole@soton.ac.uk UNFOLD meeting, University of Braga 15th June 2005
0 comments
Post a comment