0
Beyond the lower-bound: the fossilrecord can provideempirically-informed priordistributions on node ages inpoorly-sampled ...
Credit/blameMatt Friedman Mark Bell
When?
When?
When?Olenekian247.2251.2
Prior distribution247.2
Prior distribution247.2?
Fossil dating approaches #1Nowak et al. 2013
Fossil dating approaches #2Bapst in pressTime
Required dataTreeTip agesSampling rateBranching rateExtinction rateExtant diversity
Required dataTreeTip agesSampling rateBranching rateExtinction rateExtant diversity
Fossil dating approaches #3τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3Hedman 2010τ0
Fossil dating approaches #3τ0τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3Hedman 2010Age (Ma)τ0
Problemτ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0Hedman 2010
Solution #1τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0Hedman 2010
Solution #2τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0Hedman 2010
Solution #2τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0Hedman 2010=
Frequency of problemLloyd et al. 2008135/416 ‘unique’ nodes
Frequency of problem135/416 ‘unique’ nodesWhat about theother two thirds?Lloyd et al. 2008
Modified approach
Modified approach
Modified approach123
Modified approach123Min Max
Modified approach1 2 3123Min Max
Modified approach123
Data• Informal supertree• Molecular backbone• 29 source trees• 567 taxa (483 fossil)• c. 10 minutes
Dated tree
Testing t0
Testing t0
Cambrian vs. Jurassic t0: Median
Cambrian vs. Jurassic t0: Mean
Cambrian vs. Jurassic t0: L95%
Cambrian vs. Jurassic t0: U95%
Molecular divergences #1Meredith et al. 2011
Molecular divergences #2dos Reis et al. 2012
Molecular comparisonThis studyMeredithet al. 2011dos Reiset al. 2012This study -Meredithet al. 20111.07-1.17 -dos Reiset a...
Molecular comparisonThisstudyMeredith et al. 2011 dos Reis et al. 2012
Conclusionsτ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0
Conclusionsτ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0
Conclusions
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Beyond the lower-bound: the fossil record can provide empirically-informed prior distributions on node ages in poorly-sampled groups

241

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology, Spiritual
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
241
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Beyond the lower-bound: the fossil record can provide empirically-informed prior distributions on node ages in poorly-sampled groups "

  1. 1. Beyond the lower-bound: the fossilrecord can provideempirically-informed priordistributions on node ages inpoorly-sampled groupsGraeme T. Lloyd, Matt Friedman andMark A. Bell
  2. 2. Credit/blameMatt Friedman Mark Bell
  3. 3. When?
  4. 4. When?
  5. 5. When?Olenekian247.2251.2
  6. 6. Prior distribution247.2
  7. 7. Prior distribution247.2?
  8. 8. Fossil dating approaches #1Nowak et al. 2013
  9. 9. Fossil dating approaches #2Bapst in pressTime
  10. 10. Required dataTreeTip agesSampling rateBranching rateExtinction rateExtant diversity
  11. 11. Required dataTreeTip agesSampling rateBranching rateExtinction rateExtant diversity
  12. 12. Fossil dating approaches #3τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3Hedman 2010τ0
  13. 13. Fossil dating approaches #3τ0τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3Hedman 2010Age (Ma)τ0
  14. 14. Problemτ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0Hedman 2010
  15. 15. Solution #1τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0Hedman 2010
  16. 16. Solution #2τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0Hedman 2010
  17. 17. Solution #2τ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0Hedman 2010=
  18. 18. Frequency of problemLloyd et al. 2008135/416 ‘unique’ nodes
  19. 19. Frequency of problem135/416 ‘unique’ nodesWhat about theother two thirds?Lloyd et al. 2008
  20. 20. Modified approach
  21. 21. Modified approach
  22. 22. Modified approach123
  23. 23. Modified approach123Min Max
  24. 24. Modified approach1 2 3123Min Max
  25. 25. Modified approach123
  26. 26. Data• Informal supertree• Molecular backbone• 29 source trees• 567 taxa (483 fossil)• c. 10 minutes
  27. 27. Dated tree
  28. 28. Testing t0
  29. 29. Testing t0
  30. 30. Cambrian vs. Jurassic t0: Median
  31. 31. Cambrian vs. Jurassic t0: Mean
  32. 32. Cambrian vs. Jurassic t0: L95%
  33. 33. Cambrian vs. Jurassic t0: U95%
  34. 34. Molecular divergences #1Meredith et al. 2011
  35. 35. Molecular divergences #2dos Reis et al. 2012
  36. 36. Molecular comparisonThis studyMeredithet al. 2011dos Reiset al. 2012This study -Meredithet al. 20111.07-1.17 -dos Reiset al. 20121.00-1.09 1.00-1.16 -
  37. 37. Molecular comparisonThisstudyMeredith et al. 2011 dos Reis et al. 2012
  38. 38. Conclusionsτ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0
  39. 39. Conclusionsτ6τ5τ4τ2τ1τ3τ0
  40. 40. Conclusions
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×