A new dinosaur supertree   and the utility of large trees in          macroevolutionG. T. Lloyd, K. E. Davis, D. Pisani, J...
“The affinities of all the beings of the sameclass have sometimes been representedby a great tree…”                       ...
Why bigger is better• Increased taxon sampling can aid  phylogenetic accuracy (e.g. Hedkte et  al. 2006)• Phylogenetic sig...
But…• Morphological datasets still lag behind• Holtz et al. 2004 (76 taxa, 638 characters)• Alternative is a supertree app...
Methodological improvements• Data quality   – Matrix and character list   – Independent analyses only (redundancy)• Taxa  ...
Results• Total of 139 publications and 152 source  trees• Initial MRP matrix of 449 species and 2139  ‘characters’• Parsim...
Ornithischia   Sauropodomorpha   Theropoda
Pisanosaurus              Stormbergia  Lower Elliot Fm.       HeterodontosauridaeLesothosaurus                           G...
Saturnalia‘Prosauropoda’             Sauropoda                            Eusauropoda                              Neosaur...
Herrerasauridae                                           Pedopenna   Eoraptor                                         Pro...
What use are big trees?• Size change• Ghost ranges• Palaeobiogeography
Size Change in Dinosauria• Used femur length data of Carrano  (2006)• Ancestral sizes reconstructed using  minimum sum of ...
Size Change in Dinosauria
Size Change in Dinosauria
Ghost Ranges in Dinosauria
Ghost Ranges in Dinosauria
Palaeobiogeography of Dinosauria• Replaced each taxon with area• Modern day continents used (except India)• Fitch (1972) p...
Palaeobiogeography of Dinosauria
Palaeobiogeography of Dinosauria
Summary• We can (and should) attempt ever larger  trees• Large phylogenies provide a framework for  quantitatively testing...
AcknowledgementsMany thanks to everyone who responded to ourrequests for reprints and to Sandra Jasinoski forproviding hel...
Postgrad Conference, Bristol (UK)           April 13th-14th 2007       Details at: www.palass.org
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

A new dinosaur supertree and the utility of large trees in macroevolution

561 views
397 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
561
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

A new dinosaur supertree and the utility of large trees in macroevolution

  1. 1. A new dinosaur supertree and the utility of large trees in macroevolutionG. T. Lloyd, K. E. Davis, D. Pisani, J. E. Tarver,M. Sakamoto, R. Jennings, D. W. E. Hone and M. J. Benton
  2. 2. “The affinities of all the beings of the sameclass have sometimes been representedby a great tree…” Charles Darwin, 1859“All the events of biological evolution areplayed out somewhere along the branchesof phylogenetic trees” Mark Pagel, 1999
  3. 3. Why bigger is better• Increased taxon sampling can aid phylogenetic accuracy (e.g. Hedkte et al. 2006)• Phylogenetic signal may still reside in poorly known taxa (Wilkinson and Benton 1995)• Computationally feasible (e.g. Frost et al. 2006: 532 OTUs)• Taxonomic gaps inhibit phylogenetic interpretation (e.g. Lieberman 2000)
  4. 4. But…• Morphological datasets still lag behind• Holtz et al. 2004 (76 taxa, 638 characters)• Alternative is a supertree approach• Much maligned for a variety of reasons, but methodology is improving!
  5. 5. Methodological improvements• Data quality – Matrix and character list – Independent analyses only (redundancy)• Taxa – Species (Weishampel et al. 2004) – Higher taxon substitution (Page 2004)• Standardised input – Strict consensus trees• Differential weighting
  6. 6. Results• Total of 139 publications and 152 source trees• Initial MRP matrix of 449 species and 2139 ‘characters’• Parsimony ratchet (Nixon 1999)• Ran for one week and recovered…• …1 MPT!
  7. 7. Ornithischia Sauropodomorpha Theropoda
  8. 8. Pisanosaurus Stormbergia Lower Elliot Fm. HeterodontosauridaeLesothosaurus Genasauria CerapodaThyreophora Marginocephalia EuornithopodaSteg. Ankylosauria Pachy. Ceratopsia Hadrosauridae
  9. 9. Saturnalia‘Prosauropoda’ Sauropoda Eusauropoda Neosauropoda Diplodocoid. Titanosauria
  10. 10. Herrerasauridae Pedopenna Eoraptor ProtarchaeopteryxCoel. Neocerat. Tetanurae Megal. Neotetanurae Carn. Coelurosauria Tyrann. Comp. Ornitho. Maniraptora Ther. Ovir. Al. Av. Deinonycho. Al. Av.
  11. 11. What use are big trees?• Size change• Ghost ranges• Palaeobiogeography
  12. 12. Size Change in Dinosauria• Used femur length data of Carrano (2006)• Ancestral sizes reconstructed using minimum sum of squared change• Recorded change along each branch (ancestor-descendant pair)
  13. 13. Size Change in Dinosauria
  14. 14. Size Change in Dinosauria
  15. 15. Ghost Ranges in Dinosauria
  16. 16. Ghost Ranges in Dinosauria
  17. 17. Palaeobiogeography of Dinosauria• Replaced each taxon with area• Modern day continents used (except India)• Fitch (1972) parsimony used to estimate ancestral area distributions (Lieberman 2000)• Four types of branch: – Emigration (e.g. NA -> SA) – Range Expansion (e.g. NA -> NA+SA) – Range Contraction (e.g. NA+SA -> SA) – Stasis (e.g. SA -> SA)
  18. 18. Palaeobiogeography of Dinosauria
  19. 19. Palaeobiogeography of Dinosauria
  20. 20. Summary• We can (and should) attempt ever larger trees• Large phylogenies provide a framework for quantitatively testing (macro)evolutionary hypotheses• Dinosaurs: – generally got bigger – have an incomplete fossil record – didn’t get out much
  21. 21. AcknowledgementsMany thanks to everyone who responded to ourrequests for reprints and to Sandra Jasinoski forproviding helpful comments on an earlier version ofthis presentation. The speaker’s travel costs werepaid by NERC studentship NER/S/A/2004/12222.
  22. 22. Postgrad Conference, Bristol (UK) April 13th-14th 2007 Details at: www.palass.org

×