• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
SSK_Busan_Workshop
 

SSK_Busan_Workshop

on

  • 440 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
440
Views on SlideShare
414
Embed Views
26

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 26

http://laton.wikispaces.com 26

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    SSK_Busan_Workshop SSK_Busan_Workshop Presentation Transcript

    • Progress Report:Triple Helix (TH) on Web&Types of TH
      Gohar Feroz Khan
      Dept. of Media & Communication, YeungNam University,South Korea.
      Prepared for:
      SSK (Social Science Korea) Project Workshop Busan
    • Introduction
      Progress Report
      Article 1:
      Measuring Triple Helix on the web.
      Longitudinal trends of among University (U), Industry (I), and Government (G)
      Article 2:
      Broadening TH by proposing 5 types of TH
      That may exist under certain conditions from evolutionally economic point of view
      We will use Social network analysis concepts such as strong and week ties and information theory.
    • Article 1Measuring Triple-Helix on the Web: Longitudinal Trends of Relationship among University-Industry-Government (UIG) in Korea
    • Article 1: Measuring TH on the web
      Several models and approaches have been proposed for measuring knowledge-based system of innovation, for example
      National Innovation System (Freeman, 1987, 1988; Lundvall; 1988).
      Mode 1 and Mode 2 knowledge creation Machanisim (Gibbon, 1994)
      Triple Helix Model (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 1995, 2000)
    • However,
      majority of the studies that measure this infra are conducted in non-Asian (i.e. English) context (LEE and JEONG (2008)
      And limited only to analyzing contents of written communication in English.
      In addition, they use well documented and formal written communications, such as, patent and publications, for example PARK et al. (2005).
      Furthermore, most of the knowledge-based innovation indicators, such as, Science Citation Index are available commercially and accessibly only to subscribers
    • Thus
      In this research, we try to measure the strength of relations among TH components in Korean context using World Wide Web (WWW).
      We argue that WWW and advanced search engines on the internet can indicate UIG relations using Triple helix indicators (Leydesdorff and Curran, 2000;) in Korean context
    • Method
      We employed
      webometrics combined with
      content analysis, and
      co-word analysis technique in this research.
      Data:
      Naver.com (the most popular search engine in South Korea) using WeboNaver in March 2010
      Naver started its service in 1998, thus we harvested the data from 1999 to 2009 (see table 1)
      We analyzed a verity of sources—web, documents, blogs, online café, knowledge in, and media
      Search Terms with Boolean operators:
      “대학(dae-hawg)” “기업(ghi-oeup)” and “정부(Jeong-bu)” were used.
    • Table 1 Number of hits for TH components from 1999 to 2009
    • Results
      Figure 1 A longitudinal trend of Web-based T(uig) across categories
    • Results
      Figure 2 Occurrence of UIG in Web documents
      Figure 3 Strength of the bilateral and trilateral relationship in web docs
      President Noh—2003 to 2007
    • Results
      Figure 4 and 6 Titles of Knowledge In
    • Results
      Figure 6. A longitudinal trend of occurrence of U, I, G in the titles of all five categories
    • Conclusion
      The results indicate that the UIG relationship varied according to the government’s policies and that there was some tension in the longitudinal UIG relationship.
      Further, websites/documents and blogs were the most reliable sources for examining the strength of and variations in the UIG bilateral and trilateral relationships on the Web.
      In addition, web-based T(uig) values showed a stronger trilateral relationship and larger variations in the UIG relationship than SCI-based T(uig) values.
    • Article 2Broadening the Triple Helix
    • Introduction
      We have several models
      National Innovation System (Freeman, 1987, 1988; Lundvall; 1988).
      Mode 1 and Mode 2 knowledge creation Machanisim (Gibbon, 1994)
      Triple Helix Model (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 1995, 2000)
      According to Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff (2000) knowledge-based innovations system can be operationalized in terms of network of relationships between university, industry, and government
    • Introduction
      However, TH fails to capture the dynamic of nature of knowledge-based innovation (KBI) system that may prevail in different economies (particularly developing countries) under the pressure of economic condition from evolutionary perspective.
      In this article, we argue that interaction among the actors of knowledge based innovation system is a complex phenomenon & may take different forms due to economic pressure, prevailing circumstances, diversity in the linkages, and complex nature of KBI system
    • Social Network Ties
      Strength of Week ties (Granovetter,1973)
      Bridging ties (Harary, et al, 1965;)
      Structural holes (Burt, 1992)
    • 5 types of TH
      Type 1:
      Figure 1 Type 1 Triple Helix
      University (U)
      Industry (I)
      Type 1 TH may exist in situation where the fundamental components (university, industry, government) of a knowledge-based economy produce novelty independently from one another and networked ties are not yet established.
      Lack of network ties; KBI system may exist but no collaborative novelty production is taking place, thus it is inefficient
      Government (G)
      Let us assume that U represents the novelty produced by university, expressed in terms of SCI publications, I by industry, and G by government independently from one another.
      The total output of the knowledge based innovation system “T” can be expressed as
      T= U+I+G
    • 5 types of TH
      Type 2:
      Figure 1 Type 1 Triple Helix
      University (U)
      Industry (I)
      Government (G)
      Type 2 TH exists when two of the components of KBI system established bilateral ties for join novelty production. However the third component is not yet part of network as shown in the figure 2. Here U and G are collaborating in novelty production whereas; I is not part of network and may produce novelty independently.
      Network ties established; KBI exist but not efficient due “I” not participating in the systems.
      Missing ties. One of the fundamental components is not participating in the novelty production
      Figure 2 Type 2 Triple Helix
      The total output of the knowledge based innovation system “T” can be expressed as
      T= U+I+G-ug
    • 5 types of TH
      Type 3:
      Figure 1 Type 1 Triple Helix
      Government (G)
      University (U)
      Industry (I)
      Type 3 TH exists when one of the players, normally government, plays a central role in KBI system by facilitating the novelty production and different types of ties exist among the players, such as, combination of strong and week ties as shown in figure 3.
      Bridging , week ties, and structural hole
      KBI system established with high efficiency due to existence of combination of strong ties, week ties, and bridging ties.
      The total output of the knowledge based innovation system “T” can be expressed as
      T= U+I+G-ug-ig
    • 5 types of TH
      Type 4:
      Figure 1 Type 1 Triple Helix
      Bridging , week ties, and structural holes missing
      Industry (I)
      University (U)
      When all the components of KBI system establish bilateral network ties among each other it forms type 4 TH as shown in the figure 4.
      Government (G)
      Network ties established; KBI exist but not efficient due to too many strong ties and information redundancy. Too costly to maintain this system
      Figure 4 Type 4 Triple Helix
      The total output of the knowledge based innovation system “T” can be expressed as
      T= U+I+G-ug-ig-ui
    • 5 types of TH
      Type 5:
      Figure 1 Type 1 Triple Helix
      Bridging , week ties, and structural holes missing
      University (U)
      Industry (I)
      When all the components of KBI system establish bilateral and trilateral network ties among each other it forms type 5 TH as shown in the figure 5.
      Redundant network ties not efficient; may give birth to negative network externality. The KBI is complex and too costly to operate.
      Government (G)
      Figure 5 Type 5 Triple Helix
      The total output of the knowledge based innovation system “T” can be expressed as
      T= U+I+G-ug-ig-ui+uig
    • Empirical validation of TH types
      In future, we plan to use WoS data to show the existence of TH types. For example, we can use SCI publication longitudinal data of Korea and some other countries?
       
    • Thank you