Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Malignant ascites dr. varun
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Malignant ascites dr. varun

7,166

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
7,166
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
85
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • It is known that about 50% of patients with malignant ascites present with ascites at the initial diagnosis of their cancer.
  • Chylous ascites has atrigylceride content of .200 mg/dL
  • confirms thediagnosis of malignancy with a specificity of 100%
  • Transcript

    • 1.  Malignant ascites (abnormal accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity ) is a manifestation of end stage events in a variety of cancers and associated with significant morbidity. Itsonset and progression is associated with deterioration in quality of life (QoL) and a poor prognosis.
    • 2. The malignancies mostcommonly associatedwith malignant ascitesinclude 1. gynecologic malignancies, 2. gastrointestinal malignancies, 3. breast cancer and 4. carcinoma of unknown primary. Among the gynecologic malignancies, ovarian carcinoma predominates.
    • 3.  It has been considered pathognomonic for the diffuse implantation throughout the peritoneal cavity. But the actual tumor burden and location of the disease can vary quite dramatically.
    • 4.  In patients with malignancy-related ascites  only 2/3 - have peritoneal carcinomatosis.  remaining 1/3 - nonmalignant causes e.g secondary to portal hypertension or lymphatic obstruction. as in cases of massive liver metastases or lymphoma, respectively.
    • 5.  Differentiation between neoplastic and nonneoplastic causes of ascites can be challenging.  indistinguishable by physical examination and radiographic appearance Unlessassociated with overt evidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis
    • 6.  Not completely understood Mechanical:obstruction of lymphatic drainage due to tumor growth Cytokines: protein production causing increased vascular permeability leading to excess fluid accumulation (i.e. VEGF) Hormonal: decreased removal of fluids due to lymphatic obstruction –reduced circulating blood volume –activation of renin-angiotensin system –sodium & fluid retention
    • 7. Proposed pathophysiology involved in malignant ascites development
    • 8.  Abdominal distension, pressure, fullness SOB, dyspnea, orthopnea Early satiety, nausea, vomiting Heartburn Peripheral edema Reduced mobility (i.e. bending, sitting upright)
    • 9.  Ultrasoundor CT likely required to demonstrate small volumes of free peritoneal fluid Diagnostic paracentesis to determine type of ascites with newly diagnosed cases Identifyingetiology is essential to determining interventions required
    • 10.  Visual inspection  Grossly bloody fluid –malignancy.  Cloudy fluid suggests infection.  Milky fluid suggests chylous ascites – often associated with malignancy, especially lymphoma. Chemical analysis of ascitic fluid  transudate and exudate - Division has not proven to be beneficial for malignant ascites.  test useful for distinguishing malignant from cirrhotic causes of ascites is the serum-to- ascites albumin gradient.
    • 11.  Serum to ascites albumin gradient  ≥1.1 g/dL - portal hypertension with 97% accuracy, whereas a lower gradient indicates a lack of PHT and possibly the presence of a malignancy Cytology  presence of malignant cells - specificity 100%.  gold standard for the diagnosis.  The sensitivity of cytology is only 60%, as not all tumors shed cells into the peritoneum.  Patients with ascites due to advanced hepatocellular cancer, massive liver metastases, and lymphoma have uniformly negative cytology. Immunohistochemistry  can help distinguish cancer cells from nonmalignant cells such as mesenchymal cells.  have not replaced cytology as the gold standard for the diagnosis of malignant ascites.
    • 12.  Other tests which can be done  To differentiate between malignant versus nonmalignant ascites,  sialic acid levels, improvement in the sensitivity and  HCG-β levels, specificity for the diagnosis of  VEGF levels, malignant ascites, but not recommended for routine clinical  telomerase activity, use.  fibronectin, and  cholesterol levels.  To link the presence of ascites with an underlying primary malignancy  CA 125,  CEA and Added benefit is unclear  CA 19-9
    • 13.  Inspite of investigations, among patients diagnosed with malignant ascites, 20% will have tumors of unknown primary origin Advances in imaging and immunocytochemical analysis, will continue to influence a decline in the number of cases of malignant ascites associated with carcinoma of unknown primary. Laparoscopy and biopsy - a safe and minimally invasive techniques to help establish primary tumor diagnosis ,  esp. in women with good performance status who have no apparent cause for ascites.
    • 14.  Thepresence of malignant ascites has a strong negative prognostic import,  different for different malignancies. Oneretrospective study reviewed experience with malignant ascites over 10 years.  The gastrointestinal malignancies associated with the poorest prognosis  gastric carcinoma (median survival of 1.4 months),  pancreatic cancer (median survival of 1.4 months) and  colon cancer (median survival of 3.7 months).  Ascites of ovarian origin has a better median survival than all other cancer groups. Ayantunde AA, Parsons SL. Ann Oncol.2007;18(5):945–949.
    • 15.  otherprognostic factors especially in the nonovarian cancer groups  low serum albumin,  liver metastases, and  elevated serum bilirubin.  Parsons SL, Lang MW, Steele RJC. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996;22(3):237–239.  Mackey JR, Venner PM. Can J Oncol. 1996;6(2):474–480.
    • 16. Dietary Dietary salt restriction (2 g salt or 88 mmol Na+/d) should be initiated Routine water restriction is not necessary.  Ifdilutional hyponatremia (serum Na+ <120 mmol/L) occurs, fluid restriction to 1,000-1,500 mL/d usual
    • 17. DIURETICS There is a lack of randomized trials to assess the efficacy of diuretics in malignant ascites. Uncontrolledtrials show an average response rate of 44% when diuretics are used.
    • 18.  Spironolactone100-400mg/day Furosemide 40-120mg/day Responses have been identified in those with  increased renin values,  massive liver metastases as well as  elevated SAAG. The goal of diuretic therapy should be a daily weight loss of  ≤1.0 kg in patients with edema  ~0.5 kg in those without edema until ascites is adequately controlled.
    • 19.  Paracentesis can result in rapid symptom control in 90% of patients. no agreement on the optimal rate of fluid removal large volume paracentesis (up to 5 L ) can be performed without complication like renal impairment and hypotension which are well documented in the nonmalignant liver disease population.  McNamara P. Palliat Med. 2000;14(1):62–64.  Stephenson J, Gilbert J. Palliat Med.2002;16(3):213.
    • 20.  Paracentesiscan be done safely in the presence of coagulopathy. • Runyon BA. Hepatology. 1998;27(1):264–272. There is no evidence for benefit with the use of albumin infusions for patients with malignant ascites after large volume paracentesis. • Salerno F, et al. J Hepatol. 1987;5(1):102.
    • 21.  Hypovolemia after large volume paracentesis, hypotension electrolyte imbalance, visceral or vascular injury Infection and rarely, Pulmonary embolization. Hypoalbuminemia with repeated paracentesis.
    • 22.  In an effort to minimize these complications and to provide greater patient comfort, indwelling percutaneous catheters, such as the Pleurx catheter (Denver Biomedical, Denver, Colorado), were developed to provide long- term access for repeated external drainage. These catheters can be managed at home with drainage performed as needed for comfort.
    • 23.  TheLaveen shunt ,The Denver Shunt  Both shunts direct ascitic fluid into the vena cava through a one-way valve. Palliatesymptoms in 70% of patients. Complications include  shunt occlusion,  bleeding,  fever - True fever associated with shunting is transient  infection,  cardiopulmonary compromise,  hepatic encephalopathy and  DIC.
    • 24. Contraindications to peritoneovenous shunt  fulminant hepatic failure  DIC  Ascites with +ve cytology  haemorrhagic ascites increased risk for shunt block  chylous ascites,  loculated ascites ,  cardiac, pulmonary, or renal insufficiency,  life expectancy less than a month. Shunt block occurs more often in the patients with positive cytology The shunt tends to function longer in the patient with cytologically negative fluid
    • 25.  Parsons and associates demonstrated no survival or quality-of-life advantage when peritoneovenous shunting was compared with repeated paracentesis.  Parsons SL et al. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996;22(3):237–239. Shunts may not be an optimal option in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, as the response rates for symptom control are inferior to those with ovarian and breast cancer • Adam RA, J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(6):999–1011
    • 26.  high cytotoxic concentrations of active agents will reach the abdominal cavity with minimum systemic absorption and systemic toxicity clinical trials involving patients of ovarian carcinoma have shown that intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be superior to systemic chemotherapy with regard to PFS and median OS. Studies showed that the combination of a systemic and an intraperitoneal chemotherapy was more effective than an exclusively intravenous treatment. Deborah K. et al. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:34-43
    • 27.  Better tolerated intraperitoneal drugs include cisplatin, carboplatin, mitomycin C, 5fluorouracil, and bleomycin. With the exception of ovarian cancer, the effectiveness of intraperitoneal administration of these drugs is unclear due to lack of large randomized clinical studies Studieshave demonstrated benefits with cytoreductive surgeries of intraperitoneal tumours followed by intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapies
    • 28.  Yan et al. have reported favorable survival in selected patients with colon cancer, appendiceal cancer, and mesothelioma undergoing radical tumor debulking and peritonectomy followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Yan TD, Stuart OA, Yoo D, et al. J Transl Med 2006;4:17. Others have reported the intraoperative use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivered via continuous infusion using a roller pump and a heating element immediately after cytoreductive surgery. Experimental data have demonstrated that hyperthermia can enhance the cytotoxicity of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Although encouraging, this aggressive combined approach should be reserved for selected patients with malignant ascites.
    • 29.  OK-432 : A preparation from the Su-strain of Streptococcus pyogenes. Intraperitoneal OK-432 reported ascites reduction in approximately 60% of patients. Mechanism of action is not clear. Mean survival for patients receiving this therapy was 10.2 months compared to 3.1 months for a control group.
    • 30. Metalloproteinase inhibitors- Batimastat hasbeen studied in early phase clinical trials of patients with malignant ascites. Ascites prevention and reduction have been reported, but larger trials are needed to define the actual clinical benefit of these inhibitors. Themajor adverse effect in the first 24 hours was nausea and vomiting.
    • 31. Anti-VEGF therapy The use of inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase activity of VEGF has been shown to inhibit formation of ascites in cell lines and animal models. Unfortunately there have been are no human studies at this time with this modality
    • 32.  Direct intraperitoneal administration of cytokines including interferon-α,interleukin- 2, and tumor necrosis factor has been reported with variable effectiveness in small pilot studies.  Stuart GC, Nation JG, Snider DD, et al. Cancer 1993;71:2027.  Lissoni P, Barni S, Tancini G, et al. Support Care Cancer 1995;3:78.  Rath U, Kaufmann M, Schmid H, et al. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:121.
    • 33.  cellular adhesion molecules are overexpressed in several malignancies One cellular adhesion protein called epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) EpCAM is a significant tumor antigen because its overexpression has been observed in a majority of carcinomas including ovarian cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonsmall cell lung cancer
    • 34.  The inhibition of this antigen has been associated with a decrease in the proliferation, migration, and invasion of cancer cells Catumaxomab is a trifunctional antibody with one binding arm to the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) of carcinoma cells, with the second binding arm to CD3-receptors of T cells and with its Fc portion to the Fc receptor of accessory cells such as macrophages and natural killer cells. Trifunctional antibodies have a much higher capacity for tumor kill than previous monoclonal antibody lines.
    • 35.  When compared with paracentesis alone, paracentesis followed by catumaxomab therapy was associated with significant prolongation of paracentesis-free survival, improvement in the quality of life, there are also signs of a prolongation of overall survival. The benefits of catumaxomab were seen across a broad range of epithelial ovarian and nonovarian cancers. Catumaxomab was generally well tolerated in the pivotal phase II/III trial.

    ×