Draft sactaf presentation pp v3(1)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Draft sactaf presentation pp v3(1)

on

  • 670 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
670
Views on SlideShare
670
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Thanks for opportunity to <br /> present the residents&apos; view of the problem <br /> explore the issues and options <br /> present the case for action <br />
  • Large, high capacity vehicles <br /> Unregulated increase in bus traffic over the years as the School has expanded <br /> High volume, now over 60 bus movements a day <br />
  • Bus routes converge on Cathedral conservation area <br /> Densest flows in the narrowest streets <br /> Ironic that Verulam Road was opened in 1826 to reduce the danger and congestion caused by coaches in the Cathedral quarter <br /> Another constraint on already limited resident parking <br />
  • Pedestrians include children on the way to Abbey Primary <br /> Damage to parked cars and congestion leads to altercations with bus drivers <br /> Intransigent and arrogant stance of the School has led to a stand-off with the local community <br />
  • A majority of residents opposed the scheme citing clear evidence of dangers <br /> APRA formed, 120 members in 6 months <br /> The Safety Audit supported these views <br /> 96% of residents responding to the SACTAF Survey reiterated the concern <br />
  • But there we can make some interesting inferences from some of the detailed conclusions <br /> Note that Romeland is 4.5m wide but Romeland Hill is even narrower at 3.5m <br /> Solution still urgently needed <br /> It did not look at the safety of Romeland Hill as a School bus stand, so let&apos;s do that briefly ... <br />
  • Pictures taken last week in Spring sunshine <br /> Tight squeeze with no pavement <br /> Single file access only <br /> Imagine the difficulty with 2 to 4 buses to pass <br /> With any sort of obstruction students will walk between buses and into the road ... <br />
  • Buses are too big for bay even when parked up against wall - even with a tight squeeze for students half the bus extends into road way <br /> The bay is 2.4m wide, the buses at least 2.5m. <br /> With space for passenger access half the bus extends into the roadway reducing the available road width from 3.3m to to 2.1m <br /> This is not enough for commercial vehicles, buses or emergency services which require 3.3 m. The Safety Audit stated that 5.6m is the minimum for two-way traffic with buses <br /> Romeland Hill is not fit for purpose as a bus stand – it is not a solution, it&apos;s an accident waiting to happen <br />
  • Features: <br /> Dilutes and distribute bus flows outside the Cathedral quarter, and preferably the City Centre <br /> Provide a better bus stand for the School because Romeland Hill is not fit for purpose <br /> Are within a safe and reasonable walking distance of the School, ie sustainable <br /> … preferably with modest costs attached <br /> 5 locations identified <br /> Holywell Hill was a 6th but disregarded as HCC policy is not to allow main roads to be used – although the School use it – one of many oddities <br />
  • Romeland Hill used a baseline for comparison <br /> Unsurprisingly, buses designed for mass transit and motorways have difficulty negotiating mediaeval streets <br /> Romeland Hill is not suitable as a bus stand, either for the buses or passengers – it is too dangerous <br /> The dual-use bays are 2.4 m wide, the buses 2.5m and with space for passengers to enter /exit they restrict the narrow roadway even more <br /> Clear and present dangers exist – as reported by residents and as the Safety Audit confirmed <br />
  • The two most likely options keep buses out of Cathedral quarter with direct access from main road PSV routes <br /> Remove over 60 bus movements/day - a bonus, especially given the Council&apos;s concerns with pollution in the City Centre <br /> There is space for buses and passengers, but may need more <br /> Easy walking routes, which may need some improvement <br /> The School have started raising funds for new science facilities which may offer Section 106 opportunities to fund improvements to the bus service <br />
  • The walk to School might take 10 – 15 min but with the time saved on the bus journey by avoiding the City Centre and Cathedral quarter traffic this could be easily reduced by 5 or 10 min <br /> It could be reduced still further with a new bridge and Park entrance to the School <br /> Or, with a new entrance and access through Council owned land at the bottom of Abbey Mill Lane opposite the Fighting Cocks <br /> Both would provide safe and sustainable travel to School and keep buses out of the Cathedral quarter and students away from roads <br />
  • … the School&apos;s threat to axe the bus service if required to move from Romeland is irresponsible and should be treated as such <br />
  • Clear statement from the School that role numbers are at a maximum and will not be increased unless sustainable travel options are introduced <br /> While getting started on a solution that dilutes and distributes bus traffic we&apos;d like to see progress Romeland Hill and the Abbey Gateway <br /> Although the prospect of a dialogue with the School is a welcome change of tune, “actions speak louder than words” so residents expect action or token gestures as part of a PR exercise <br />
  • Despite the HCC view, the Dept for Transport Road Signs Manual has a ready solution to the problem <br /> It looks like it was drafted with us in mind <br /> It allows for limited ad hoc exceptions too <br />
  • Actions speak louder than words <br /> We look forward to working with the School and Council to provide the solutions so urgently needed <br />

Draft sactaf presentation pp v3(1) Draft sactaf presentation pp v3(1) Presentation Transcript

  • The School Bus Problem Issues and Options Tuesday 18 March APRA and FSRA
  • 2 The Cause … bus sizes and numbers have grown with the School's success … bus sizes and numbers have grown with the School's success
  • 3 School Bus Network … the bus service underpins the School's success by extending its catchment area … the bus service underpins the School's success by extending its catchment area
  • 4 Bus Flow Density … heaviest bus traffic in narrowest streets of Cathedral quarter … heaviest bus traffic in narrowest streets of Cathedral quarter
  • 5 The School Bus Effect  Danger to pedestrians, including children  Damage to parked cars and buildings  Frequent traffic conflicts and congestion  Resident parking restrictions  Increased pollution  Negative impact on Cathedral area character … local residents and businesses are the victims of the School's success
  • 6 The Current Situation  Danger and nuisance from buses is unacceptable  Agreed by Council and School last March  Romeland Traffic Scheme solution proposed  Many residents objected to obvious dangers  HCC Safety Audit agreed, too risky, essentially because ... ... the buses are too large for the narrow streets of the Cathedral quarter
  • 7 Safety Audit Findings  Buses turning out of George St increase risk of collisions between vehicles and or pedestrians … but what about buses turning into George St?  Insufficient road width (<5.6m) in Romeland to allow two-way traffic increases the risk of conflict … but what about George St, Romeland Hill and Fishpool St? ... the risks are the same, the dangers remain
  • 8 Dual-use bay the Solution? For students: no pavement, tight squeeze, single file access, easily obstructed ... For students: no pavement, tight squeeze, single file access, easily obstructed ...
  • 9 Dual-use bay the Solution? For buses: too large for the bays, road obstruction ... For buses: too large for the bays, road obstruction ... For all: it's an accident waiting to happen, unfit for purpose For all: it's an accident waiting to happen, unfit for purpose
  • 10 Alternative Solutions School … bus stand space outside the Cathedral area with an easy walk to School ... … bus stand space outside the Cathedral area with an easy walk to School ...
  • 11 Romeland Hill  Advantage – proximity to School front gate  Bus access – very poor, narrowest streets  Suitability for:  Buses - very poor  Drop-off and pick-up - very poor  Issues:  Dangers remain  Dual-use bay will not help  Conclusion – unfit for purpose … with reasonably foreseeable dangers
  • 12 Westminster Lodge and Museum  Advantages – not Romeland Hill, sustainable  Bus access – very good, avoids Cathedral area  Suitability for:  Buses – excellent  Drop-off and pick-up – excellent  Issues – other users and lighting  Conclusion – much more suitable, at a cost … potential for Section 106 funds?
  • 13 Recap – Cause and Effects Danger to pedestrians Damage to cars and buildings Frequent traffic congestion Increased pollution Adverse impact on Cathedral area Danger to pedestrians Damage to cars and buildings Frequent traffic congestion Increased pollution Adverse impact on Cathedral area
  • 14 More Sustainable Solutions … adds about 5 mins to the journey or nothing with a new Park entrance to the School … adds about 5 mins to the journey or nothing with a new Park entrance to the School
  • 15 Summary  The present arrangements for School buses are unsafe and unfit for purpose  There is a duty of care to the local community and a bus ban is possible  Options are available to dilute and distribute their impact outside the Cathedral quarter  Residents expect the Council to take the lead to provide the much needed solution … in short, a compelling case for action
  • 16 The Way Forward Council to work with the School and others to:  plan, fund and implement a sustainable solution over the next 12 months, starting asap  confirm Section 106 powers will be used in respect of any future School developments  initiate bus stand safety audit in advance of changes to Romeland Hill dual-use bay parking restrictions  introduce “school keep clear markings” at the Abbey Gateway  produce good practice guide for school bus schemes
  • 17 School Bus Prohibition  An order prohibiting buses is likely to be made where country lanes are narrow and inappropriate for buses or where buses are likely to cause a nuisance to residents  Limited exceptions are possible, for example “Except for access to off- street premises”… specifically designed to solve our problem … specifically designed to solve our problem
  • 18 Non Nobis Nati or ‘Born not for ourselves’ The School motto which, as its website states: “embodies the School’s ideal of social responsibility and service to the community and a recognition that privilege must be balanced by obligation”.