Evaluation capacity development in partner countries – Marco Segone UNICEF

  • 548 views
Uploaded on

Presentation at the Evaluation Day 2011, HAUS Helsinki

Presentation at the Evaluation Day 2011, HAUS Helsinki

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
548
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
16
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. National Evaluation Capacity Development A conceptual framework
  • 2.  
  • 3. WHY
  • 4. Mutual accounta bility Managing for results Harmoni zation Alignment Ownership National ownership and capacity development: the key ingredients to development Management for DevResults and Paris Declaration Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
  • 5. Partner countries exercise effective leadership over their development policies and strategies
    • Partner countries exercise leadership in developing and implementing their national development strategies
    • Donors respect partner country leadership and help strengthen their capacity to exercise it
    Implications to the M&E Function
    • Strengthen and use country-led M&E systems
    • Institutionalize M&E systems
    • M&E capacity development to ensure international standards are met
    Paris Declaration Commitment
  • 6. … in line with the UN General Assembly …
    • national Governments have the primary responsibility for coordinating external assistance and evaluating its contribution to national priorities
    • mandated the United Nations system to promote national ownership and capacity development , and to make system-wide progress in harmonizing evaluation practices
    UNICEF
  • 7. UNICEF and UNDP ExBoards strongly requested to address it …
    • UNICEF ExBoard:
    • emphasizes that programme countries should have greater ownership and leadership in the evaluation of all forms of assistance
    • underlines the importance of increasing the participation of national counterparts and strengthening national capacity in evaluation
    • encourages UNICEF to use national evaluation systems , where available, to continue to incorporate capacity-building mechanisms into programme design and implementation and ensure that evaluations are responsive to national demand
    UNICEF
  • 8. WHAT
  • 9. A Systemic approach to Capacity Development. UNICEF Individual Level (skills, knowledge, experience)
  • 10.
    • Supply side:
    • Behavioural independence
      • Independence of mind & integrity
      • Knowledge and respect of evaluation standards
      • Agreed evaluation processes & products
    • Professional competences
      • Formal education (Masters)
      • Specialized training (UN Training, IPDET)
      • Professional Conferences and meeting
      • On the job training (country-led evaluations)
      • Community of Practices and networking
    • Demand side
    • Capacity to strategically plan evaluations, and to identify the key evaluation questions
    • Capacity to manage evaluation for independence and credibility
    • Capacity to use evaluation
    Individual Level
  • 11. A Systemic approach to Capacity Development. UNICEF Individual Level (skills, knowledge, experience) Institutional Level (policies, procedures, frameworks)
  • 12.
    • Evaluation culture
      • Set of values and attitudes supporting evaluative (critical) thinking within an organization
      • Institutional commitment to learning from evaluation, support evidence-based policy debate and demand for accountability.
      • Individual more self-directed learners and use information to act; take higher risks but also develop a greater sense of personal accountability and responsibility; consult, coach, and support each other more.
      • Protective culture (Remove repercussions on careers)
      • Understanding of the foundations and principles of Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Institutionalizing independence, credibility and utility
      • Evaluation policies
    • Work programme and budget
      • Independence & adequacy of budget
    • Conduct of evaluations
      • Institutional endorsement of standards
      • In-built Quality Assurance systems
    Institutional Level
  • 13. A Systemic approach to Capacity Development. UNICEF Individual Level (skills, knowledge, experience) Institutional Level (policies, procedures, frameworks) Enabling Environment (policies, legislation, power relations, social norms)
  • 14.
    • Public administration committed to manage for results and accountability
      • Transparency
      • Results-based public budgeting
      • Evidence-based policy making
    • Strong civil society
      • rights holders able to demand for and monitor quality of public services
    • Strong national evaluation association
      • foster indigenous demand for M&E, and strengthen indigenous supply
    Enabling Environment
  • 15. HOW? Selected UNICEF’s examples
  • 16.
    • Organize meetings and/or conference bringing together
    • the demand side (policy makers, CSO, media) and the
    • supply side (public administration, private sector, academia) to discuss strategies to enhance the use of evidence generated through national evaluation system
    • to influence public policies for children
    • Support right-holders feedback mechanisms and systems , by developing evaluation capacities of non-Governments stakeholders
    • Strengthen policy-makers demand for M&E systems , by enhancing the demand for evidence by Parliaments and Governments
    Enabling Environment
  • 17.
    • Support Governments in conducting a diagnostic of the (existing or potential) country evaluation system
    • Targeting technical support based on bottlenecks identified in the diagnostic
    • Identifying and supporting local leaders for country-led evaluation systems for children, especially in the initial stage .
    • Seed/support a pool of local talent/national expertise in evaluation , including by supporting National (or Regional) Evaluation Associations and/or National (or regional) Centers of Excellence
    • facilitating south-south knowledge sharing among countries with identified “good practices”
    Institutional Level
  • 18.
    • promote the professionalization of evaluation by:
      • Maintaining KM system in support of Country-led M&E systems
      • Organizing series of live webinars
      • Providing capacity development opportunities to selected individuals
    Individual Level
  • 19.
    • We should always aim at strengthening National ownership and leadership, and not undermining it:
    • Selecting topics of mutual interest
    • Implement evaluations jointly with Governments, as a first step towards country-led evaluation
    • Hiring local experts to the maximum extent possible
    • Not assuming there are weak evaluation capacities, even if none is immediately apparent
    • Co-ordinating with other UN agencies and key international stakeholders
    • Invest in the country-led process, even if it may require additional efforts and less control
    We need a mind shift to do things differently...
  • 20. Thank you