Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at the Human-Livestock-Wildlife Interface

2,587

Published on

The One Health Approach: Identifying Solutions to Complex Problems at the Livestock-Wildlife Interface. Presented by Health for Animals and Livelihood Improvement Principal Investigators Jon Erickson …

The One Health Approach: Identifying Solutions to Complex Problems at the Livestock-Wildlife Interface. Presented by Health for Animals and Livelihood Improvement Principal Investigators Jon Erickson (University of Vermont) and Rudovick Kazwala (Sokoine University of Agriculture) at the GL-CRSP End of Program Conference, June 17, 2009, Naivasha, Kenya.

1 Comment
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,587
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
1
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Zoonotic pathogens, such as influenza and SARS, account for the majority of emerging infectious diseases in people [Taylor et al., Phil Trans Royal Society, 2001].More than three quarters of emerging zoonoses are the result of wildlife-origin pathogens [Jones et al., Nature, 2008].4. Wittermyer et al. [Science, 2008] found that average annual population growth rates were higher in buffers to protected areas than in rural areas of the same country in Africa and Latin America. Protected areas provide some of the last supplies of ecosystem goods and services for expanding human populations, including firewood, bush meat, clean water, medicinal plants, and areas of safety during civil strife.
  • The consequences of change are far reaching. Increased livestock-horticulture conflict, as scarce water resources affect land management decisionsIncreased grazing pressure as more cattle are packed into smaller areas with remaining water, also overgrazing has led to increased incursions into the wildlife protected areas by cattle to gain access to better grazing and waterIncreased wildlife conflicts, especially with elephants coming through farms seeking access to waterConcentration of wildlife at few waterholes has led some to poison those water holes for bushmeatLost potential tourism revenues as habitat degraded and wildlife become scarce; areas of water scarcity are the same areas where wildlife viewing is popular. Decreased water causes water stress and forces all to share low quality sourcesIn 2006 power shortages resulted after both reserviors fed by the GRR were too low to generate hydropower, turning an ecosystem level crisis into a national economic issue. Water stress, poor forage can all result in increased vulnerability of livestock and wildlife to disease
  • SE Goals:What are the impacts of water limitation and disease on Maasai, Barabaig and Sukuma household economies? How are these impacts distributed across different socioeconomic groups? What are the economic impacts of disease and water scarcity on other economic sectors in the region? What are the attitudes, perceptions, and practices of pastoralists and agropastoralists in regards to disease, disease management and livestock/wildlife extension?
  • One pathogen of particular interest is bovine TB (comment on Claire’s talk). In the Southern Highlands region 13% of cattle tested between 1994-1997 reacted to M.bovis using the single comparative intradermal tuberculin test, with 51% of herds containing at least one reactor. (Kazwala 2001). The highest reactor prevalence in cattle was reported in the hot, dry, lowland areas closer to Ruaha NP. Reactor prevalence of 80% has been reported in a sample of cattle from Usangu. Therefore, recent movement of Usangu cattle out of one area may disperse these highly infected herds. TB reduces market value for any livestock sold. Additionally, BTB is zoonotic and traditional practices of pastoralists such as drinking fresh milk and milk products, eating undercooked meat and living in close proximity with cattle may increase their risk of exposure. On the wildlife side, buffalo populations have declined sharply in RNP. Although water limits may be playing a major role, other causes have not been investigated. In fact it is not known whether wildlife in RNP have ever been exposed to BTB, and given its high ungulate diversity and the existence of both large kudu and buffalo populations, known reserviors in S. Africa, the question is urgent.
  • Kaz – these are the spoligotype patterns for 3 of 4 HALI samples (there is no pattern for the 2nd impala?). Also patterns from HarrisonsCows. If you want can use this to show point: BTB bacteria isolated from infected wildlife and livestock share a similar molecular pattern, supporting the hypothesis that disease transmission between livestock and wildlife has occurred.
  • Transcript

    • 1. One Health Approach to Solve Complex Problems and Improve Livelihoods at theHuman-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
      Health for Animals & Livelihood Improvement (HALI) Project
      http://haliproject.wordpress.com
    • 2. One Health Approach
      Human-Livestock-Wildlife Interface in the Ruaha Landscape of Tanzania
      Stakeholder-Research Partnership
      HALI Project – Socioeconomic research
      – Disease & water sampling
      – Education & outreach
      One Health Approach to Livelihood Improvement
    • 3. Human-Livestock-Wildlife Interface
      • Majority of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) in people are zoonotic
      • 4. 75% of emerging zoonoses with wildlife origins
      • 5. Anthropogenic activities at the interface linked to EIDs (Nipah virus, SARS, Ebola)
      • 6. Avg. annual population growth among highest in buffers to protected areas
    • IP
      Ruaha Landscape of Tanzania
      Ihefu
      Wetland
    • 7. Importance of the Ruaha Landscape
      Conservation Significance
      Resources for Rural
      Livelihoods
      National Development
    • 8. Increasing Water Scarcity …
      Pre-1993:
      Year round flow
      of Great Ruaha
      2005:
      119 days of
      no flow
    • 9. … from Irrigation and Grazing Pressures
      9/26/2001
      Presumed extent of irrigation
      vs. observed flooded areas
      Cattle density (#/km2) at boundary
      of RNP, WMA, & village lands
    • 10. Decline of the IhefuWetland and …
      22 Aug 1991
      322 km2
      21 July 2000
      153 km2
      2-9 Feb 2006
      84 km2
      IP
      Ihefu
      Wetland
    • 11. … Collapse of Water Buffalo Range
    • 12. Stakeholder-Research Partnership
      Identifying the
      Problem Model
      • Pastoralist interviews
      • 13. Field visits
      • 14. Pre-project stakeholder workshop
    • Consequences of Change
      ↑ Livestock-horticulture conflict
      ↑ Grazing pressure
      ↑ Wildlife conflicts & poaching
      ↓ Tourism revenues
      ↓ Wildlife
      ↓ Water & Water quality
      ↓ National economy
      ↑ Disease?
    • 15. HALI Project
      – Goals
      Determine the prevalence and transmission ecology of zoonotic diseases among wildlife, livestock, and pastoral communities.
      Assess the effects of water management and quality on the presence, abundance, and severity of disease.
      Assess how water management and disease affect the health and economic livelihoods of pastoral communities.
      Identify and recommend measures to mitigate the effects of zoonotic diseases and water limitations.
      Strengthen local capacity to diagnose zoonotic diseases and design prevention programs.
    • 16. HALI Project – Approach
      Disease Data
      Livestock sampling
      Health and economic
      impact of disease
      Recommendations
      for disease prevention
      Recommendations
      for water management
      Wildlife sampling
      Water sampling
      Socioeconomic
      Data
      Pastoralist
      household
      surveys,
      workshops,
      & focus groups
      TRAINING & CAPACITY BUILDING
    • 17. HALI Project – Socioeconomic Research
    • 18. HALI Project – Household Survey Sample
    • 19. HALI Project – Household Survey Sample
      Percent of head of households born in the village:
      Maasai (n=63) = 19%
      Sukuma (n=53) = 0%
      Barabaig (n=43) = 0%
      Number of years head of household has lived in
      the village:
    • 20. HALI Project – Disease Perception
      Where does illness come from in your livestock?
    • 21. HALI Project – Household health
      Do you or anyone in your household drink blood from your livestock (%)?
    • 22. Photo: J. Brownlee
      HALI Project – Water and Sanitation
      Do livestock enter the sources of any of your drinking or bathing water?
      Yes = 67% No = 30%
      Don’t know = 3%
      Do wildlife enter the sources of any of your drinking or bathing water?
      Yes = 65% No = 23%
      Don’t know = 12%
      Do you believe sharing water sources with livestock to be a health risk?
      Yes = 18% No = 61%
      Don’t know = 22%
    • 23. HALI Project – SE Regression Analysis
      Probability of reported chronic diseases in households:
      Of poorer socioeconomic group
      With reports of sick cattle
      Who reported consumption of raw cow blood
      Located further away from surface water sources
      Probability of reported sick cattle in herd in households:
      • With low accessibility to veterinary care through extension officer
      • 24. Located further away from surface water sources
      Next steps are to merge SE analysis with
      wildlife, livestock, and water data
    • 25. HALI Project – Livestock Disease
      Slaughtered animals
      • 170 cattle and 58 shoats
      • 26. 18% M. bovis
      • 27. Both cattle & shoats
      Live cattle
      • BTB reactor prevalence = 2%
      (n=1350 cattle)
      • Herd BTB reactor prevalence = 18% (18/102 households)
      • 28. Herd BTB prevalence w/ suspects = 28% (28/102 households)
      • 29. Brucellaseropositve = 7%
      (88/1334 cattle)
      • Herd Brucellaseropositive = 42%
      (39/93 households)
      Photo: HALI
    • 30. HALI Project – Wildlife Disease
      BTB
      Samples collected in 2006/2007 through mid-2008
      4/43 (9%) positive for BTB via culture
      2 impala, 1 buffalo, 1 lesser kudu
      Brucella
      1/27 (4%) tested to date seropositive
      Only seropositive animal was the BTB infected buffalo
    • 31. HALI Project – Potential BTB Transmission
    • 32. HALI Project – Water Sampling
      11 Sites:
      Stratified by use:
      • 1 livestock only
      • 35. 2 wildlife only
      • 36. 1 human only
      • 37. 4 human + livestock
      • 38. 1 wildlife + livestock
      • 39. 1 human + wildlife
      • 40. 1 human + livestock +
      wildlife
    • 41. HALI Project – Water Sampling
      Giardiaoocyst
      Detection of water borne parasites:
      • Giardia
      • 42. Cryptosporidium
      Note:
      • First use of MS–DFA
      technology
      • Heaviest protozoa
      burden in water source
      frequented by humans
      and livestock
      Cryptosporidiumoocyst
    • 43. HALI Project – Water Sampling
      Isolations of enteric
      bacteria:
      Salmonella -virulence gene PCRs
      19 Salmonella isolates characterized for
      relatedness using rapid PCR and virulence genes
    • 47. HALI Project – Education & Outreach
      Training
      2 MPVM @ SUA, 1 MS @ UC Davis, 1 PhD @ UVM, 3 externs (2 TZ, 1 UC Davis), 2 honors BVM @ SUA, & outreach to over 600 people
      Outreach
      Direct assistance to pastoralists + various community events
      4 radio shows on health and education
      Community scout and hunter education
      Publications & Conference Presentations
      6 GL CSRP research briefs published
      Invited article under review at PLOS Medicine (others drafted)
      17 professional meetings & seminar presentations
    • 48. HALI Project – Education & Outreach
      Partnerships and Networking
      Tanzania: Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania National Parks Authority, Veterinary Investigation Centers, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, District Livestock Offices, National Institute for Medical Research, National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Program, Southern Highland Livestock Development Association
      United States: University of California at Davis, University of Vermont, USAID, Envirovet, Einstein Medical College
      International: Wildlife Conservation Society, International Livestock Research Institute, various professional societies
    • 49. One Health Approach to Livelihood Improvement
      • HALI Project has demonstrated that when livestock and wildlife are in close proximity, diseases can have severe impacts on livelihoods and biodiversity, and may also affect human health.
      • 50. These findings call for the One Health approach in intervening the challenges presented in ecosystems with interfaces between livestock, wildlife and humans.
      • 51. Trade-offs are needed to balance the needs of people and their domestic animals with wildlife.
      • 52. Disease control must consider natural resource use, cultural or indigenous practices, and perceptions.
    • Asante sana
      This research was made possible through support provided to the Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program by the United States Agency for International Development under terms of Grant No. PCE-G-00-98-00036-00 and by contributions of participating institutions.

    ×