Wrong confirmation ID

Email
Favorite
Favorited ×
Download
Embed
Private Content
Copy and paste this code into your blog or website Copy Customize… Close
We have emailed the verification/download link to "".
Login to your email and click the link to download the file directly.

To request the link at a different email address, update it here. Close
Validation messages. Success message. Fail message.

Check your bulk/spam folders if you can't find our mail.

Tweet

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

ISCRAM 2010 - Effective Coordination of Disaster Response - International Perspective

by Gisli Olafsson on May 04, 2010

1,269 views

Talk given at the ISCRAM 2010 conference on effective coordination of disaster response as seen from the international perspective.

Talk given at the ISCRAM 2010 conference on effective coordination of disaster response as seen from the international perspective.

Accessibility

View text version

Categories

News & Politics

Tags

information management cluster approach social media disaster haiti

Upload Details

Uploaded via SlideShare as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

File a copyright complaint

2 Embeds 48

http://www.iscram.org	42
http://www.slideshare.net	6

Statistics

Favorites: 1
Downloads: 20
Comments: 0
Embed Views: 48
Views on SlideShare: 1,221
Total Views: 1,269

AgricultureEmergency TelecomLogisticsWASHCamp Mgmt & CoordinationShelterHealthProtectionEarly RecoveryEducationNutrition
Thank you!
But before we do that I want to introduce you to some very interesting research from Professor Denis Mileti, the founder of the Natural Hazard Center in University of Colorado and one of the most leading acadmic researcher in the diaster management space over the last 40 years.When asked what was his most important discovery within the area of disaster mangement, Mileti said that 40 years of his work could be sumarized into this one finding.Mileti said we could define three phases of crisis. The first one is the Routine Emergency phase, something our fire figthers and police officers have to deal with every day. Then there are the disasters which overwhelm the daily responders and cause us to change our behaviour. Finally there are the catastrophees which luckliy only happen very seldom throughout our history.But lets look at these different phases and the behaviour of people during these phases. During the normal routine emergency phase, we look towards organizations such as the police to assist us in the problems we have. And when we interact with these organizations we related to the people we deal with through the roles they represent. In other words, when my house gets on fire, I call the fire department and the firemen will come and help me. I do not refer to them by their names or who they are as persons, in my mind they are representatives of the organization they work for.However during a disaster there is a radical change in our behaviour. The number of organizations involved increases and all of a sudden a coordinated approach is needed. But at this time the organizations become the problem. Political and sometimes financial motives of those organizations hinder them from working efficiently with each other. In the international humanitarian world we often see different UN organizations competing for the attention of the media and the donors instead of collaborating with other organizations involved in the same response. Very often the leadership of those organizations are playing a political game during these periods, something that can realy affect the efficiency of the response. But luckily there is a solution to this problem and in this case it is people. It is people at different levels of the organization which feel human emotions about those affected by the disaster and because of these human emotions are willing to break down and reach out of the organizational silos that they represent. It is through these kind of connection between people within the different organizations that work actually gets done. We must therefore learn to leverage and build up in advance those personal relationships between the people in these organizations.In the third phase, catastrophie, Mileti points out that society breaks down and the basic human instinct of survial kicks in. During this phase relationships no longer matter, only yourself matter. However he points out that lucklily this phase does not last for very long and only happens extreemly seldom.A key point to understand about his findings is that it is not a formal organizational declaration that transititions us between these different phases, but rather it is determined by the behaviour of the people involved.So keep this in mind as I go through the next few slides and discuss methods for effective coordination.

1 Favorite

Stinckwich Serge , researcher at IRD 2 years ago

ISCRAM 2010 - Effective Coordination of Disaster Response - International Perspective — Presentation Transcript

Effective Coordination of Disaster Response
International Perspective
Gísli Ólafsson
Disaster Management – Technical Advisor
Microsoft Corporation
gislio@microsoft.com
http://blogs.msdn.com/disaster/
@gislio
Climate Change
Live Media Coverage
Social Networks
Connectivity
Comprehensive Approach
Move from Response to Risk Management
Risks
Full Cycle
Constituents
Coordination
Cluster Approach
Information Mgmt
Crowds
Disaster Response
Coordination
Coordination in the field
Cluster Approach
Information Management
Information Management on the Ground
http://haiti.oneresponse.info
OneResponse
Response HQ
New York
On-Site Operation & Coordination Center
Port-Au-Prince, Haiti
Health Cluster
Shelter Cluster
Distributed Authorship
Disaster Sites
Disaster Clusters
The Crowds
Facilitated
Knowledge Management
Collaborative
Workgroups
Social
Networks
Need for Evolution
Discussion Boards
Comments
Podcasting
Shared Calendars
Microblogging
Versioning
Profiles
Document Libraries
Team Sites
Tags
Blogs
Task Lists
Wikis
Surveys
Ratings
EnterpriseCollaboration
Capabilities
SocialComputing
Technologies
DisasterCommunities
The Need for Communities
Normal (routine emergencies)
- People relate as roles
- People are the problem
- Orgs are the solution
Disaster
- Relate as People
- Orgs are the problem
- People are the solution
Catastrophe
- Society breaks down
- No relationships – survival
- Only happened a few times (Hiroshima)
E=mc2 of disasters