The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is a large open international community of network designers, operators, vendors, and researchers concerned with the evolution of the Internet architecture and the smooth operation of the Internet. It is open to any interested individual.
The IETF is an organized activity of the
IESG (Internet Engineering Steering Group)
The IESG is responsible for technical management of IETF activities and the Internet standards process. It administers the process according to the rules and procedures that have been ratified by the ISOC Trustees. However, the IESG doesn't do much direct leadership , such as the kind you will find in many other standards organizations. As its name suggests, its role is to set directions rather than to give orders . The IESG ratifies or corrects the output from the IETF's Working Groups (WGs), gets WGs started and finished, and makes sure that non-WG drafts that are about to become RFCs are correct.
IESG Area Directors
The IESG consists of the Area Directors (ADs), who are selected by the Nominations Committee (which is usually called "the NomCom") and are appointed for two years.
The current areas and abbreviations are shown below.
Applications (APP): Protocols seen by user programs, such as email and the web
General (GEN): Catch-all for WGs that don't fit in other areas (which is very few)
Internet (INT): Different ways of moving IP packets and DNS information
Operations and Management (OPS): Operational aspects, network monitoring, and configuration
Real-time Applications and Infrastructures : Delay-sensitive interpersonal communications
Security (SEC) Authentication and privacy
Transport (TSV) Special services for special packets
IETF Working Groups
The vast majority of the IETF's work is done in many Working Groups
A WG is really just a mailing list with a bit of adult supervision
Each Working Group has one or two chairs
More important, each WG has a charter that the WG is supposed to follow. The charter states the scope of discussion for the Working Group, as well as its goals
Any decision made at a face-to-face meeting must also gain consensus on the WG mailing list
There is no formal voting. The general rule on disputed topics is that the Working Group has to come to "rough consensus
BOFs (Birds of a Feather)
A Birds of a Feather (BOF) meeting has to be approved by the Area Director in the relevant area before it can be scheduled. If you think you really need a new WG , approach an AD informally with your proposal and see what he or she thinks. The next step is to request a meeting slot at the next face-to-face meeting.
Many BOFs don't turn into WGs for a variety of reasons. A common problem is that not enough people can agree on a focus for the work. Another typical reason is that the work wouldn't end up being a standard -- if, for example, the document authors don't really want to relinquish change control to a WG.
0 comments
Post a comment