• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
六合彩|香港六合彩 » SlideShare
 

六合彩|香港六合彩 » SlideShare

on

  • 1,232 views

港六合彩都有机会见到的,既然香港六合彩家已主动邀请我,我哪有决绝的理由。可是东哥,姜森急道:东方易那句'自己小心'不是已在暗示你了吗,去...

港六合彩都有机会见到的,既然香港六合彩家已主动邀请我,我哪有决绝的理由。可是东哥,姜森急道:东方易那句'自己小心'不是已在暗示你了吗,去北京,怕凶多吉少啊。

恩,我知道,老森,不用再多说了,危险于否,我心里自然有数。谢文东摆摆手,也让姜森剩下的话憋回肚子里。

怎么不说话?刘波正愣神,被谢文东的问话突然惊醒,想起东哥刚才问自己的问题,忙答道:杜庭威本来就是个心理脆弱的香港六合彩,一听自己得了爱滋病,整个香港六合彩都崩溃了,三天前香港六合彩将夜总会的经理抓起来,到现在还没放香港六合彩,恐怕经理已经……

下面话的不用说,谢文东可以了解那倒霉经理的命运了,香港六合彩认真的系好衣襟上最后一个扣子,张开双臂转个身,笑眯眯道:穿这身衣服去见中央领导,不算太失礼吧?!东哥,这套衣服很合身,也很合适你。刘波满面愁容道,此去北京,前途未卜,也许……香港六合彩不敢继续想象下去。老刘,你在担心吗?透过镜子,谢文东看见刘波无神的双眼。

东哥……恩。谢文东转过身,看了看左右与

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,232
Views on SlideShare
1,232
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    六合彩|香港六合彩 » SlideShare 六合彩|香港六合彩 » SlideShare Presentation Transcript

    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 1
      • What is COSE?
      • VLE free to HE, FE and others [as of June 2002]
      • characterised by it’s pedagogical framework – for structured
      • focussed & active learning. also in its reuse of content [but not
      • as learning objects in the wider meaning of that term], in the
      • quality control inherent in publication of content, in the sharing
      • of resources [ importance attached to collaboration working ],
      • and its distributed nature so suitable for ‘distance’ learning
      • use of specifications / standards – evolving. But IEEE now a
      • standard
    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 2
      • Overview
      • How current version COSE 2.05 implements the metadata spec
      • - but this talk / presentation not particularly about metadata (!),
      • rather is meant to be contextual, and about metadata issues
      • [and presented from our own perspective, so not concerned with
      • other metadata initiatives, pro tem]
      • 1. Demonstrate use of metadata in content packaging
      • 2. Plans for metadata in context of current phase,
      • / SURF X4L project - Using metadata (**!!)
      • 3. Discussion of issues
    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 3
      • 1. Demonstrate use of metadata in content packaging (i)
      • COSE 2.05 uses Version 1p2p2
      • instance not system conformant [we say]
      • but there is no conformance authority
      • what we have instead – best practice established through groups such as
      • this and EC SIG.
      • at least we can say, COSE is consistent with practice established through
      • user community e.g. EC codebash. participants inc. some but not all VLE
      • vendors. but important that metadata experts should not be left out of the
      • picture [ => why I am here]
    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 4
      • 1. Demonstrate use of metadata in content packaging (ii)
      • COSE 2.05 manual – Appendices E & F
      • Appendix E: export procedure: demo
      • why tag content with metadata / have to make this as simple as
      • possible
      • task of supplying metadata divided between individuals
      • involved in [content] export procedure
      • also automated in some limited sense
    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 5
      • 1. Demonstrate use of metadata in content packaging (iii)
      • Appendix F: metadata used in COSE
      • http:// www.staffs.ac.uk/COSE/cosenew/metadata_used_in_cose.doc
    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 6
      • 2. Plans for metadata / SURF X4L project - Using metadata (**!!)
      • [ important driver for use of metadata is content exchange / repositories
      • (X4L programme) ]
      • (a) Export (b) and import of standalone content objects
      • v COSE packages - would allow exchange of unpublished content
      • demo
      • 2. options / code for search engine / database?
    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 7
      • 3. Discussion of issues (i)
      • [context: respecting content packaging in particular]
      • - conformance requirements too loosely defined in spec docs.
      • so we can implement without using metadata (!)
      • - extensions: drive spec development but compromise interoperability
      • - control documents. different control docs allowed, local copy or web ref
      • - vocabularies
      • - user issues
      • - others described in IMS briefs e.g. multiplicity of elements [no limit (!)],
      • use of vCard, unique Ids
      • see
      • http://www.staffs.ac.uk/COSE/cosenew/metadata_cose.doc
    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 8
      • 3. Discussion of issues (ii)
      • [ context: some wider issues ]
      • use: most systems not [system] conformant / not searching on metadata;
      • was true 18 months ago. now ? [ => will find out in course of SURF X4L
      • w VLE partners (Bb / Learnwise / Teknical). SCORM conformance ? ]
      • metadata: context [and see next slide]
      • c.f. CP v (staffs uni) web project
      • meta tag / established means of specifying DC metadata
      • IMS used for packaged content but not more widely
      • e.g. free standing web content / other e.g. library resources
      • standardization: what this means. the data model, not any binding, is
      • standard
      • drivers for use of metadata: content exchange / repositories [ X4L]
    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 9
      • 3. Discussion of issues (iii)
      • [ context: relation of IMS to other specs / standards ]
      • IMS and DC: what IMS spec says wrt DC
      • DC dot notation – from FAQ - “ Dublin Core metadata can be stored using
      • the meta element in the head of HTML documents. An informational IETF
      • RFC (2731) titled "Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTML" defines the
      • standard* way to do this”. – [ ? not ready for IMS dot notation]
      • IMS spec 1p2p1 v 1p2p2. SCORM 1p2 uses 1p2p1.
      • *the note says not standard
    • Implementing IMS Metadata in COSE 10
      • For more on COSE [history, developments, pedagogy, FAQ,
      • registration, reports, technical requirements / details etc ..]
      • http://www.staffs.ac.uk/COSE/
      • For more on interoperability
      • http://www.staffs.ac.uk/COSE/ims_briefs.html
      • For manual and downloading from support server
      • [need to register]
      • http://www.cose.ac.uk/cose/