Small Group Teaching in Higher Education

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Small Group Teaching in Higher Education - Presentation Transcript

    1. Small groups 20 March November 2009 George Roberts Directorate of Human Resources
    2. Introduction
      • Do you teach (or have you ever taught) small groups?
      • Identify small-group teaching situations
    3. Feedback
      • Small group teaching situations include:
    4. Feedback
      • Small group teaching situations include:
      • 75 => 15 => pairs
      • on the wards
      • practicals
      • role play
      • field work
      • aggregate/disaggregate
      • seminars
    5. Activity
      • In pairs for about 3 minutes
      • What are the most rewarding features of small group teaching?
    6. Feedback
      • Rewards of small-group teaching include:
    7. Feedback
      • Rewards of small-group teaching include:
      • students can take risk
      • involvement
      • immediate feedback
      • levelling of relationship/informality
      • students can be responsible/no hiding
      • opportunity for f2f interaction, everyone has a voice
      • diagnostic
      • equal opportunity to have a go
      • space to think and give an opinion, explore own thinking and ideas
      • get to know students better
      • motivation, works two ways
      • encouragement can build confidence
      • co-construction of group knowledge & identity
      • student-centred/led learning
    8. Small Group Structures
    9. Rounds
      • Encourages everybody to contribute
      • Circle
      • Trigger sentence
      • ‘ a question I would like answered today is … ‘
      • each person takes it in turn to offer a short comment
    10. Buzz groups
    11. Circular interviewing
      • Each person takes it in turn to interview the person opposite them in the circle
      • The role of interviewer and interviewee is passed round the circle until everybody has had a turn at each role
      • ‘ what have you read ..’
    12. Fish Bowl
      • Members in the inner circle are involved in discussion /role-play/ group activity
      • Members on the outside have the role of observer
    13. Other Small Group Structures
      • How else can you organise small groups?
    14. Activity
      • double pairs (= 4) for about 3 minutes
      • What are the environments in which small group teaching takes place?
      • How do time scales affect small group work?
    15. Feedback
      • What are the environments for small group teaching?
    16. Feedback
      • What are the environments and time scales for small group teaching?
      • seminar
      • lecture theatre
      • online
      • small room with moveable furniture
      • construction site
      • breakout rooms
      • canteens
      • work sites
      • laboratories
      • art room
      • Barcelona
      • office
      • book shops
      • malls
      • library
      • reinvention centre/ASKE building
      • conference centre
    17. Feedback
      • How do time scales affect small group work?
    18. Feedback
      • How do time scales affect small group work?
      • initial awkwardness, students need clear briefs
      • time needs to be managed
      • staff schedules may constrain small group activity
      • tasks might go from 2 min to 30 min
        • or over a semester!
        • or as long as it takes
      • different groups work at different speeds
      • time it takes depends on the aim/outcome intended
      • needs time built in for sharing/feedback/hearing others
      • groups may persist longer than the tasks they do
    19. Activity
      • Back in your fours for about 3 minutes
      • What were the differences between pairs and fours?
    20. Feedback
      • Differences between pairs and fours include:
    21. Feedback
      • Differences between pairs and fours include:
      • pairs reinforce ideas, larger groups get diversity of ideas
      • allocate roles
      • in fours people can hide, pairs force interaction
      • bigger group more hiding possibilitie
      • roles emerge, leader, spokesperson, domination and submission
      • group dynamic becomes foregrounded: teachers need to know when students need help with role emergence
      • role differentiation becomes important
      • bigger group may force consensus; can this be damaging?
      • sub-groups emerge
    22. With thanks to http://www.sweetmarias.com/articles.shtml
    23. Groups
      • A gathering of people is a group
      • when its members are collectively conscious of their existence as a group;
      • when they believe it satisfies their needs;
      • when they share aims, are interdependent, like to join in group activities, and want to remain with the group.
      • Though groups occur in many forms and sizes, there seems to be a set of characteristics fairly common to them all.
      • From: Small group teaching by David Jaques http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/2_learntch/small-group/index.html
    24. Characteristics of groups
      • A definable membership
      • Group consciousness
      • A sense of shared purpose
      • Interdependence
      • Interaction
      • Ability to work as a single unit
      • John Adair 1989 ‘ Effective team building ’ London, Gower
    25. Roles
      • Task-based roles
      • Personal attributes, styles and preferences
    26. Group (team) roles
      • “ A tendency to behave, contribute and interrelate with others in a particular way” (Belbin)
        • Everybody has a preferred role
        • People are likely to take on more than one role
        • team roles are not personality types; they are clusters of characteristics,
      • Role orientation
        • Action
          • shaper, implementer, completer finisher
        • People
          • chair/co-ordinator, teamworker, resource investigator
        • Cerebral
          • plant, monitor/evaluator, specialist
      • General group roles
        • Group building & maintenance
        • Group task
    27. Belbin: Team Roles
      • Plant
      • Resource Investigator
      • Co-ordinator
      • Shaper
      • Monitor-Evaluator
      • Teamworker
      • Implementer
      • Completer-Finisher
      • Specialist
    28. Good education practice
      • encourage student-tutor contact
      • encourage student-student co-operation
      • encourage active learning
      • give prompt feedback
      • emphasise time on task
      • have and communicate high expectations
      • respect diverse talents and ways of learning
      • (Chickering & Gamson, 1987)
      • independent of the mode of engagement
    29. Activity
      • Self organise
      • Four groups
        • As near as possible along discipline lines
        • Identify the common features of your disciplinarity
    30. Feedback
      • Identify groups and common features
    31. Feedback
      • Identify groups and common features
      • Odds & sods: Business & technology, arts, professional
        • common features
          • skills as well as theory
          • applied theory
      • Humanities
        • text based subjects
        • not factual but negotiable
        • study social relationships past present and future
        • ability to detach oneself from the field of study
      • Science, the ‘ologists’
      • quantification and measurement
        • theory-based / evidence-based
        • falsifiable
        • predictive
        • critical thinking
    32. Activity (simulation)
      • In your groups develop a short group learning activity
      • relevant to your discipline
      • prepare a presentation of this activity using the flip chart paper
    33.  
    34. Design for Learning Background reading Individual task Group task Plenary Follow through
    35. Design for Learning (distribute) background reading Individual task: write one sample examination question and explain why this is a good question. Post to discussion area Plenary: presentation by groups Follow through: collate and distribute all questions & criteria Framing: final examination will be composed of your questions Group task Evaluate Critique on discussion board Compile sample examination paper and post Produce assessment criteria For n Groups
    36.  
    37. Activity
      • Form groups
      • In groups
        • Identify topic
        • Write objective(s)
        • Plan session
      • Plenary
        • Present
        • Debrief
      Plan Brief overall Brief groups Group work Objectives
      • Identify topic
      • Determine approach
      • Inductive
      • Deductive
      • Kolb position
      Present Debrief
    38. Aims of your session
      • Agree your activity
      • then
      • Using circular interview technique to ensure each person contributes
      • Identify the aims of your session
    39. Activity (simulation)
      • In your groups develop a short group learning activity
      • relevant to your discipline
      • prepare a presentation of this activity using the flip chart paper
      • 20 minutes
    40. Feedback
      • Group presentations of outputs
      • key points
    41. Why work in a group?
    42. Summarising
      • “ How do I know until I hear myself say it?”
      • “ Academic knowledge is articulated knowledge”
      • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching - a conversational framework for the effective use of educational technology . London, RoutledgeFarmer.
      • “ Constructivism has at its heart the view that individual students construct or build their own knowledge and understanding rather than simply acquiring it pre-packaged and ready-made. The knowledge that they build will depend on several factors including what they are formally taught…the culture of their discipline”
      • Phillips, D.C. (2000) Constructivism in Education The National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago
    43. Factors to consider
      • Group size
      • Preparing learners
      • Structure of groups & communication patterns
      • Learning environment
    44. Ground rules
      • Implicit ground rules in every social situation
      • Individuals will come with their own assumptions
      • Make ground rules explicit for group
      • Rules will help the group to be effective & reduce conflict
      Rules!
    45. Terms of reference
      • What is the purpose to the group?
      • What are the expected outcomes from the group?
      • Is the group work assessed? How? Criteria?
      • What are the main components of the project?
      • What are the deadlines?
      • Are there any guidelines?
      • Are you suppose to do it on your own?
      • Do all group members share the same understanding of the above?
    46. Consider
      • Communication
      • Social
      • Decision making
      • Roles & responsibility
      • Time management
      • Task management
      • Managing group processes
      • Commitment
    47. Learning environment
      • Physical and virtual arrangements have a powerful effect on interaction
          • Lecturer is standing or sitting
          • Distance between lecturer and group
          • Position in a group is important:
          • Sitting nervous students opposite sympathetic tutor or encouraging peer
          • A dominating student can be quietened by being seated immediately next to the tutor (Griffths & Partington 1992)
    48. Effective groups
      • Contain a balanced range of members whose strengths complement each other
      • Are not small or too large
      • Members take time to form a ‘group’
      • Members are clear about their own role and that of others
      • Members understand and abide by a set of mutually agreed ground rules
      • Share out the tasks fairly
      • Are organised & self disciplined
      • Tackle problems within the group effectively
    49. Teacher Behaviours
      • Teachers’ style and approach influences the approach taken by the learner
      • Students taught by teachers with a Student Focussed approach characteristically take a deep approach to their learning - attempting to make sense of the content of their course (Sheppard and Gilbert, 1991).
    50. Thank you

    + George RobertsGeorge Roberts, 7 months ago

    custom

    854 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    A 3 hour session for the PCTHE at Oxford Brookes Un more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 854
      • 854 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 38
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories