JISC Institutional Innovation Support and Synthesis - Presentation Transcript
Institutional Innovation Support, Synthesis and Benefits realisation 24 October 2008
Outline
Community, resources and assets for education
Asset-based development
Clusters and stakeholders
Team
Plans & Activities
Support Team
Direction and planning
George Roberts
Isobel Falconer
Paul Bailey
Technology platform
Joe Rosa
Finance, admin and control
Lynn Farrell
OCSLD events team
Oxford Brookes Publishing team
Stephen Ball, Helen Swain
Analysis & discovery
Patsy Clarke
Mitul Shukla
Judy Lyons
Rhonda Riachi
Synthesis & dissemination
Emma Anderson
Steven Warburton
Josie Fraser
Graham Attwell
Working hypotheses Developing projects in a context where there is awareness of the wider activity in a field and an understanding of the alignments and gaps in that field will lead to better projects being developed. By using community development processes and social networking the general quality of educational (learning) technology development projects may be improved, bringing benefits not just to the JISC but more widely to all sectoral funding agencies and stakeholders. .
Community resources & assets for education
Asset-based community-development (ABCD) draws on
Support & synthesis team experience
JISC programme & project management
eL earning support & synthesis
Users & Innovation support & synthesis
Organisational and community development research ( Mathie & Cunningham 2003, Cooperrider & others, 1987, 2001, 2003)
Networks/groups/community/clusters - coherence
Essential to support, synthesis & benefits realisation
B ring projects & their experiences together with each other & stakeholders
Asset-based development activity
Identify strengths & develop them
Stage 1 discovery “Affective Recall”
Gunther Kress (2007) says “leverage the affective aspects of learning”
O r, remember what was good and do more of that
Identify a trusted network to which you belonged (and may still belong)
C ould be professional, recreational, educational, cultural, etc
Characterise the trust you felt in, with and for that group
H ow did it feel
What were the “ingredients” (assets) that engendered the trust
ABCD feedback
Initial (sub) clusters
IT infrastructures and architecture , consisting of
Innovative enterprise architectures
Data infrastructures for knowledge management and discovery
The physical and virtual world , consisting of
Low-carbon green computing
21 st century estates and learning environments
Learning & teaching , consisting of:
Learning, teaching and assessment
Learning management and admin
Link to C-map server
IT infrastructures and architecture , consisting of
Innovative enterprise architectures
Roehampton University, Westminster University , Cambridge (Social Networks) , Gloucestershire University
Data infrastructures for KMD
Newcastle University, Thames Valley University , Oxford (BRII)
The physical and virtual world , consisting of
Low-carbon green computing
UEA , Bolton University , Hertfordshire University
21 st century estates and learning environments
Sheffield University , Canterbury Christ Church, Oxford (Erewhon)
Learning & teaching , consisting of:
Learning, teaching and assessment
UCLAN, Coventry, Oxford (Steeple)
Learning management and admin
Reading University, Open University, Southampton (EASiHE), Cambridge (Modular e Admin), Southampton (Open Assignments)
Other dimensions?
Cross cutting themes?
Syndication, RSS
Data security
Shared services (GoogleMail, iTunesU, etc)
User engagement
Secondary themes?
Learning management and administration
New emergent themes?
taggit
Build community knowledge
distributed cognition
inin1008, #inin1008
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/inin1008/
http://twemes.com/inin1008
Slideshare (coming)
There will be more of this as the support platform is built out
Support structure
Analysis & discovery teams
Co-ordination
Patsy Clarke
IT infrastructures and architecture
Mitul Shukla
The physical and virtual world
Rhonda Riachi/Josie Fraser
Learning & teaching
Judy Lyons/Patsy Clarke
Support and synthesis activities
Biannual blended face-to-face conference
26 & 27 March 2009
Outputs and benefits realisation from institutional exemplars
First findings from round 2 projects (you)
Launch eLearning InstitutionalBCE projects
Oct ‘08- March ’09
6 Project led, support team facilitated cluster “things”
Supporting projects to form and grow satellite communities of practice that bring in new & existing stakeholder audience
Project-led cluster things
Each project, over the course of the programme will have to host a “thing” for their (evolving and expanding) cluster
Things might be:
Thematic seminar
Shared technology plugfest
Cluster dissemination widening engagement
Capacity building, hands-on, new technology workshop
Your ideas, here
Other Support & Synthesis Activities
Web platform aggregation from your sites
Programme-wide and wider social network
Newsreel activities
Informal social gatherings using real and virtual community spaces
Comms and publications in collaboration with JISC Comms team
# Tell us what you want, what you really, really want #
Analysis & discovery of Institutional Exemplar projects
Collation and analysis
Visits, interviews, seminars face to face and online
Story gathering
Sense making
Make data available through website
Benefits realisation
Foster institutional centres of innovation
centres of expertise that can support the sector
R edefine boundaries
of technology
o f learning, teaching and admin practices
a nd our own institutional boundaries
shared services
HE in FE
distributed learning centres & data centres
etc
Stakeholders
IT infrastructures and architecture
CIOs, CIS managers, Data managers, Library systems managers, ISS managers, data users
Others?
The physical and virtual world
Estates and Facilities Managers, Environmental managers & officers, learners
Others?
Learning & teaching
Academic managers, Teachers, Researchers, Librarians & learning support staff, Learning techs, Ed Devs, Academic Computing Officers
Others?
Social capital asset growth
“ cross departmental and cross domain”
Bonding
Traditional practice exhibits strong bonding capital
People identify with & support one another in established local contexts
Boundary spanning is the preserve of a few & takes place in fairly rigid structures
Bridging
Emergent, innovative practice encourages & builds on strong local bonding to enable greater numbers of people to reach out across boundaries, expanding personal spans of control & extending experience to the wider sector.
between institutions and/or projects
between senior management & project teams within institutions
0 comments
Post a comment