Web 2.0 and Financial Services


Published on

Published in: Technology
1 Comment
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Web 2.0 and Financial Services

  1. 1. MarketLab Report Web 2.0 Online Communities in Consumer Financial Services Garrett Dodge Sara Greenbaum Dong Min Kim Asier Rufino 14 December 2006
  2. 2. Project Overview Scope Analyze trends in Web 2.0 online communities and their potential intersection with consumer financial services Process Client Online Strategy Group: online retail investment brokerage <ul><li>Drafted survey questionnaire addressing major areas for project scope </li></ul><ul><li>Created list of pertinent contacts and relevant data sources </li></ul><ul><li>Identified 45 people to interview and managed to conduct 24 full interviews </li></ul><ul><li>Consolidated information emanating from research </li></ul>
  3. 3. What is Web 2.0? <ul><li>A new generation of web applications using the Internet as a platform for interaction </li></ul><ul><li>Connects communities of users (buy side) to corporate firms (sell side) </li></ul><ul><li>Is this sustainable? Or are we facing another dotcom bubble? </li></ul>
  4. 4. Web 2.0 as a Brokerage Platform <ul><li>Proposition to users of added value functionality: frequently involves empowering the user to publish content or facilitate the communication with other like-minded individuals </li></ul><ul><li>Creation of a community that interacts as frequently as possible </li></ul><ul><li>Generation of a critical mass </li></ul><ul><li>Proposition of added value products to sellers to segment / understand target customers’ behavior to better position advertising </li></ul><ul><li>Community receives advertising in a way that does not disrupt interaction with other community members and creates some value to them (i.e. pertinent advertising) </li></ul><ul><li>Agreements arranged on the basis of some revenue sharing </li></ul>
  5. 5. Methodology <ul><li>Internal documents </li></ul><ul><li>Online publications </li></ul><ul><li>Industry sector reports </li></ul><ul><li>Analysis of over 40 Web 2.0 sites </li></ul><ul><li>Interviews </li></ul><ul><ul><li>5 VCs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>6 Entrepreneurs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>5 Academics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2 CIOs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>6 Product Managers </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Attended Web 2.0 and VC conferences </li></ul>Primary Research Secondary Research
  6. 6. Interview Questions <ul><li>What are the key markets in which Web 2.0 plays an integral role? Why have businesses been able to successfully implement Web 2.0 solutions? </li></ul><ul><li>What are the growth drivers and expectations in light of anticipated improvements in technology related to social networking and online communities? </li></ul><ul><li>What are the high-level themes or trends found in online communities? What are the breadth of features found in online communities? How do companies create trust online? </li></ul><ul><li>How are companies monetizing social networking sites? How are companies perceived by their customers or online members? </li></ul><ul><li>What are the limitations for implementing some of these solutions in the financial services sector? What barriers would we need to overcome in order to implement a solution? </li></ul><ul><li>How are other financial services firms positioned relative to key competitors? What are the strengths, weaknesses and strategies of the competitors? </li></ul>
  8. 8. Market Trend: Customization <ul><li>Users want individual experience online (i.e. microportals) </li></ul><ul><li>Ability to sort through large amounts of information </li></ul><ul><li>Customizing user interface or homepage by combining modules </li></ul><ul><li>Targeted search within personal network </li></ul><ul><li>Grant personal access to other users </li></ul><ul><li>Content segmentation </li></ul><ul><li>Create personal identity or world </li></ul><ul><li>Develop personal webpage or link </li></ul><ul><li>Access to customization of other users </li></ul><ul><li>Tagging and ranking </li></ul><ul><li>Customized delivery (i.e. RSS, mobile) </li></ul><ul><li>Model portfolios </li></ul><ul><li>Create personal peer groups </li></ul><ul><li>Pertinent information may never be viewed </li></ul><ul><li>Difficult to frequently update as user habits change </li></ul><ul><li>High start-up costs </li></ul><ul><li>Good site design important to users </li></ul><ul><li>Critical mass required </li></ul><ul><li>Association with content on site </li></ul><ul><li>Difficult to present valid information to all users </li></ul>Drivers Constraints Features
  9. 9. Customization: User-Driven Design <ul><li>Concept: Users get unbiased fully customized stock alerts </li></ul><ul><li>Features </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Personalized content and site design </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Module or widget based platform </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Interaction with other sites (i.e. Digg, Deli.cio.us) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Customized chat related to stocks </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Similar site: Boursorama </li></ul>www.gstock.com Source: Company websites, Literature Search
  10. 10. Customization: User-Driven Content <ul><li>Concept: Users create customized social web applications using provided platform </li></ul><ul><li>Features: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>100% user-driven content and design </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Built-in development tools </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Provider as facilitator: web hosting, security </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Aggregated popularity index </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Similar site: Second Life </li></ul>www.ning.com
  11. 11. Market Trend: Networking <ul><li>Trust: networks built upon social connections </li></ul><ul><li>Reverse Network Effects: many users dilute quality </li></ul><ul><li>Social Accountability: Obligations to community drive behavior </li></ul><ul><li>Sub-grouping: Users form groups to share financial advice, compete in contests, etc. </li></ul><ul><li>Readily available, searchable market data </li></ul><ul><li>Self-organization into interests, affiliations </li></ul><ul><li>Targeted market </li></ul><ul><li>Self-policing and sustainable </li></ul><ul><li>Keeps sensitive information within allowed network, promotes greater openness </li></ul><ul><li>Eases transition to full community participation </li></ul><ul><li>Security: privacy of member profiles </li></ul><ul><li>Shallow Relationships: unclear extension into real world </li></ul><ul><li>Inherent Filtering: required to gather data </li></ul><ul><li>Promotes groupthink </li></ul><ul><li>Potential for fragmentation of community </li></ul>Drivers Constraints Features
  12. 12. Community: Social Networking Source: Company websites, Literature Search <ul><li>Concept: Users join online communities focused around social connections </li></ul><ul><li>Features </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Self-selected user data (affiliations, interests, etc.) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Information sharing with immediate network (event invitations, group messages) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Corporate-sponsored groups </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Restricted membership </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Similar site: LinkedIn, MySpace </li></ul>www.facebook.com
  13. 13. Community: Resource Matching Source: Company websites, Literature Search <ul><li>Concept: Users solve R&D problems of companies (solvers & seekers) </li></ul><ul><li>Features </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Clear incentives for those with resource/knowledge surplus </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>More efficient markets, lower costs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Reverse network effects: too many users dilute quality </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Similar sites: Prosper, Match, Monster </li></ul>www.innocentive.com
  14. 14. Community: Competition Source: Company websites, Literature Search <ul><li>Concept: Users build teams of players from a given sport and compete in leagues based on player statistics </li></ul><ul><li>Features: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Competition promotes high engagement level on site </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Targets young, male demographic </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Data-driven management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Users pay for live updates </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Similar Site: Motley Fool CAPS </li></ul>fantasysports.yahoo.com
  15. 15. Community: Information Sharing <ul><li>Concept: Users post estimates of their net worth </li></ul><ul><li>Features </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Comparison of financial information by age, profession, etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Blogs on personal finance decisions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Openness of users in sharing financial data </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Similar sites: Wesabe, Foonance, DimeWise, Bullpoo </li></ul>www.networthiq.com Source: Company websites, Literature Search
  16. 16. Market Trend: Collective Intelligence <ul><li>Intelligence of aggregate community vs. the individual </li></ul><ul><li>Information-sharing by individuals </li></ul><ul><li>Low cost creation of content by users </li></ul><ul><li>Increased access to user’s knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Incentives for sharing (social recognition or monetary reward) </li></ul><ul><li>Low-cost for large amounts of data </li></ul><ul><li>Self-policing within well-designed constraints </li></ul><ul><li>Information constantly updating </li></ul><ul><li>Constant customer feedback </li></ul><ul><li>Easily accessible consumer data </li></ul><ul><li>Innovative content creation </li></ul><ul><li>Law of averages creates greater accuracy </li></ul><ul><li>Necessary to filter contributions of all users (negative network effects) </li></ul><ul><li>Intellectual Property is a concern since open forum </li></ul><ul><li>Critical mass of users necessary to achieve results and draw other users </li></ul><ul><li>Gaming by users undermines trust </li></ul><ul><li>Potential for exploitation </li></ul>Drivers Constraints Features
  17. 17. CI: Knowledge of the Masses <ul><li>Concept: Users compete by managing virtual portfolios </li></ul><ul><li>Features </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Top investors aggregate into index </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Premium members get stock alerts, weekly insight, daily stock info </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Only members in top 25% for six months can post in forums </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Option to create clubs with friends, family, etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Similar sites: Iowa Electronic Exchange, Wikinancial </li></ul>www.marketocracy.com Source: Company websites, Literature Search “ What better form of collective intelligence is there than a market.” - CISR Research Scientist
  18. 18. CI: Collaboration <ul><li>Concepts: Users collaborate to author a book about intelligence of communities </li></ul><ul><li>Features </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Members add, edit, delete content </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Discussion forum, prediction market competition </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Incentive from book royalties (author credit divided among all contributors) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Similar Sites: Helium, Tax Almanac, A Million Penguins </li></ul>www.wearesmarter.org Source: Company websites, Literature Search
  19. 19. CI: Tagging / Bookmarking <ul><li>Concept: Tagging financial news articles based on ticker symbols of featured stocks </li></ul><ul><li>Features </li></ul><ul><ul><li>User categorization of items in personal lexicon (sub-grouping) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ranking and monitoring of relevant stock information </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Results in trusted search </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Similar sites: Digg, deli.cio.us </li></ul>www.digstock.com
  20. 20. CI: Product Development www.threadless.com <ul><li>Concept: Product development instance for a community-centered T-shirt store </li></ul><ul><li>Features: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Publishing of T-shirt designs online, which are put to a public vote </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Product development tool: only T-shirts with highest votes are printed </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Rewarding publishers of relevant content for the community </li></ul></ul>
  21. 21. Applying the Web 2.0 Brokerage Model <ul><li>Online communities must be monetized in a way that creates value without disrupting interaction among users </li></ul>Trust + Knowledge + Investment Ideas ADDED VALUE / FUNCTIONALITY BUILDING COMMUNITY MONETIZATION SWITCHING COSTS
  22. 22. What to do? <ul><li>Bookmarks and tagging of stocks, news, etc. for trusted searching </li></ul><ul><li>SMS/email messaging among trusted users </li></ul>Customization Community Collective Intelligence Trust Knowledge Ideas Switching <ul><li>Formation of groups with different levels of access </li></ul><ul><li>Partnering with existing sites? </li></ul><ul><li>Monitoring of top performers in aggregate (“genius picks”) </li></ul><ul><li>Management of virtual portfolios </li></ul><ul><li>Competition through incentives for good performance </li></ul><ul><li>Leagues or contests at group level </li></ul><ul><li>Searchable aggregate market data </li></ul><ul><li>Internal prediction markets </li></ul><ul><li>Blogs/bulletin boards for sharing advice </li></ul><ul><li>Search capabilities based on user profiles </li></ul><ul><li>Buzz index (most traded, most researched, etc.) </li></ul><ul><li>Community voting on new products </li></ul><ul><li>Modifiable look and feel of homepage </li></ul><ul><li>User profiles, generation of “microportals” </li></ul><ul><li>Network of friends, trusted advisors, etc. </li></ul><ul><li>Provide exclusive content, portal information </li></ul><ul><li>Network effects associated with critical mass </li></ul>
  23. 23. Recommendation: Build User Knowledge <ul><li>Targets unregistered users </li></ul><ul><li>Increases frequency with which people access site </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Creation of forums / blogs talking about general questions concerning self-investment (e.g. taxes, different vehicles) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Unregistered users would not be able to post information </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Create a parallel investment environment (Marketocracy, fantasy sports leagues) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Use of training modules (SecondLife, America’s Army) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Boost Market Data content (e.g. quotes, broker notes, news, indexes, FOREX, Commodities, major benchmarks) </li></ul></ul>
  24. 24. Recommendations: Offer Investment Ideas <ul><li>Targets both registered and unregistered users </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Rankings of stocks (e.g., top 10 volumes, increases, decreases by market) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Forums / blogs talking about the dynamics of intra-day trading </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Adopt Threadless concept to have users voting for investment ideas </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Buzz Index: Maintain aggregate statistics based on user activity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Most researched stocks, most traded, most tagged, etc. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Create search capabilities based on user profile information (Facebook) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Share portfolio with friends (NetworthIQ, Marketocracy) </li></ul></ul>
  25. 25. Appendix Web 2.0 Online Communities in Consumer Financial Services Garrett Dodge Sara Greenbaum Dong Min Kim Asier Rufino 14 December 2006
  26. 26. Criteria <ul><li>RELEVANCE: Is there a logical connection with financial services? Are there inherent association problems? </li></ul><ul><li>VALUE: Are users finding enough value out of our site? Are there enough incentives to become an active member of the community? How do we monetize this value? </li></ul><ul><li>SUSTAINABILITY: Is this a short-term or long-term solution? Are there issues of scale or scope? Are we just trying to keep up with the latest trends? Are we providing enough value for users to create high switching costs? </li></ul><ul><li>FEASIBILITY: How much time and money will it require to start up and maintain the site? Is the market too saturated for entry? Are users really ready to share their financial information openly? </li></ul>
  27. 27. Competition: Boursorama () Boursorama 2005 Financial Report <ul><li>Background: top on-line broker in Europe </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Owned by Société Générale </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>462,000 accounts; 4,4M orders executed; EBITDA: 25M EUR (*) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Features: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Virtual portfolios; quotes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Exclusive content: technical analysis, notes of brokers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Forums and online interviews </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Paid advertising </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>RSS feeds </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>@boursorama.com e-mail </li></ul></ul>boursorama.com
  28. 28. Selected Quotations Customization Community Collective Intelligence “ What better form of collective intelligence is there than a market.” - CISR Research Scientist “ In my communities research I have found that there are several types of communities cropping up online, customer service, product innovation, market research, and communities for commerce.” - hstrout, We Are Smarter “ It is also a very natural and healthy dynamic for a community to have many more 'readers' than people participating in the conversation or in the creation of media. You will find that this is the case in most communities online.” - Yaronb, We Are Smarter “ Widgets that have office functionality—and their inclusion on Intranet dashboards—is probably where Google, Microsoft and the smaller players like Pageflakes and Netvibes are heading.” - Richard MacManus, Tales from the Web 2.0 Frontier
  29. 29. References <ul><li>“ Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research” by Joyce Berg, Robert Forsythe, Forrest Nelson, Thomas Rietz; College of Business Administration University of Iowa, November 2000 </li></ul><ul><li>“ Structure and Evolution of Online Social Networks” by Ravi Kumar, Jasmine Novak, Andrew Tomkins; Yahoo! Research, June 2006 </li></ul><ul><li>“ The Challenge of ‘Customerization’ in Financial Services” by Jerry Wind; Journal of Interactive Marketing, Winter 2001 </li></ul><ul><li>“ Friendster and Publicly Articulated Social Networking” by Danah Michele Boyd: CHI 2004 </li></ul><ul><li>“ Searching Social Networks” by Bin Yu & Munindar Singh; AAMAS July 2003 </li></ul><ul><li>“ HT06, Tagging Paper, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic Article, To Read” by Cameron Marlow & Danah Boyd August 2006 </li></ul>