Differences shale gas fracking enhanced geothermal stimulation

1,105 views
985 views

Published on

Published in: Self Improvement
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,105
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Differences shale gas fracking enhanced geothermal stimulation

  1. 1. Approche comparée de fracturation hydrauliquepour l’exploitation des hydrocarbures de roche-mèreet la stimulation de réservoirs géothermiques. Gérard Lemoine, Kartuzy (POLOGNE), le 25 janvier 2013.Comparative approach of fracking applied to native rocks for oil or gas exploitationand hydraulic stimulation of geothermal reservoirs.Abstractfrom Geert Decock, Policy Officer - Food & Water Europe The general term ‘’hydraulic fracturing’ or fracking’ has been used to cover two very different technologies, both for thefracturing of gas rocks (shale gas fracking: fracking SGF) and for the stimulation of geothermal reservoirs (Hydraulicstimulation for Enhanced Geothermal System: hydraulic stimulation EGS). The briefing explains that the term “fracking”(or hydraulic fracturing) should only be used in the context of technologies to extract oil and gas from shale rocks or othersimilarly impermeable rock formations. Hydraulic stimulation is the technology used to develop geothermal energy. Howexactly are these two methods similar and how are they different from one another? Both fracking SGF and hydraulic stimulation EGS seek to change a targeted rock formation in order to facilitate theflow of fluids through rocks by using hydraulic pressure, which will release energy. In the case of fracking SGF, the waterwill transport the gas to the surface. In the case of stimulation EGS, the water will transport heat. Fracking SGF and hydraulic stimulation EGS are very different in terms of their effect on the source rock. FrackingSGF seeks to create new fractures by applying levels of hydraulic pressure that exceed the strength of the rock. FrackingSGF typically applies pressures of around 500-800 bar. On the other hand, hydraulic stimulation EGS aims to improve thepermeability of the rock by reactivating old fractures. Because hydraulic stimulation EGS does not create new fractures,much lower pressures are needed, around 50-200 bar, with pressures rarely exceeding 200 bar in geothermal activities. Another difference between fracking SGF and hydraulic stimulation EGS is the amount of drilling that is required foraccess to the resource. Extracting shale gas requires a high density of wells (about 25 per 100 square km) across very largesurfaces (100 to 100.000 square km). Geothermal reservoir stimulation only requires about 3 wells to access to a fraction ofthe surface (about 10 to 25 square km). This is possible, because geothermal drilling targets a specific geological reservoir,which allows a convective flow (see footnote) to take place, rather than expansive rock formations. The much highernumber of wells required for fracking SGF and the larger number of abandoned wells greatly augment the risks ofimproper cementing and sealing of wells. A last major difference is the different use of chemicals in fracking and stimulation. Fracking SGF requires the use of awide range of chemicals, some of which are toxic. In addition, fracking SGF also generates a lot of ‘flowback’ water, whichis a challenge to be treated on the surface. In addition, major uncertainties continue to exist about the fate of the frackingfluids that stays underground, as these fluids may have strong chemical interactions with the bedrock. The altered post-fracking bedrock could be considered as mining waste. In contrast, geothermal stimulation only uses fresh water, withoutadded chemicals, which is injected underground. This fresh water mixes with existing underground brines. The challengeof treating waste water in geothermal energy does not exist, as geothermal stimulation functions in a closed loop. As explained in greater detail in this briefing, fracking SGF and hydraulic stimulation EGS are very differenttechniques. The environmental risks and impacts of large-scale use of fracking SGF go far beyond the limited risks andimpacts of geothermal stimulation. Key words : shale gas, fracking, Enhanced Geothermal System,1: Convection is the movement caused within a fluid by the tendency of hotter and therefore less dense material to rise, and colder, densermaterial to sink under the influence of gravity, which consequently results in transfer of heat.

×