010 Holding Safely Ten

620
-1

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
620
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

010 Holding Safely Ten

  1. 1. 10 Areas of Danger and Concern 10a Areas of Danger and Concern Introduction 10 Physical action including restraint carries risks. These include the possibility of serious physical and psychological trauma and even death. Such situations could result in criminal or civil proceedings or fatal accident inquiries. Disciplinary action may result from some situations. Although serious injuries and deaths have been reported in the UK, there is still a lack of appropriate research to provide clear guidance. There is well founded and widespread concern about certain aspects of practice. So far, these have focused on the following: 10b Neck holds Holding a child by the neck risks asphyxiation (suffocation) or restricting the blood flow to the brain. It carries the risk of death. You should never use any form of neck hold. 10c Obstructing Mouth or Nose Children spitting or biting while being restrained are legitimate concerns for staff. Your welfare should be suitably protected and your concerns should be looked at by occupational health services. While you may understandably wish to cover the childʼs mouth to protect yourself from spitting or biting, you must never do so. 10d Prone restraint The term prone restraint simply means to hold a child ʻface downʼ, when on the ground, usually with their head to one side. There are many versions of this procedure. Risks associated with prone restraint can be reduced if the procedure used has a minimum effect on breathing and the health of the child is good (Graham 2002). However, the procedure may carry unacceptable risks if pressure is placed on the Return 75 Click here to returnto Contents Click here to return to Contents
  2. 2. 10 Areas of Danger and Concern childʼs torso or hips or the health of child gives cause for concern. Health concerns may include obesity, asthma or other respiratory problems (Day 2002). • Restraining children in a prone position carries a higher risk of serious harm than other holds done correctly, and as such should always be treated as a final option. • Restraining children in a prone position is more likely than other forms, such as standing or seated restraints, to be seen by them as a punishment or as abuse. • Service providers should only approve the restraining of children in a prone position when an assessment of risk shows that this is the least restrictive action necessary to achieve a safe outcome for all involved. 10e Seated holds There are many seated holds with different names in different systems and approaches to restraint. The research suggests that these techniques are seen by service users as less intrusive than prone restraint (McDonell et al. 1993). However, seated holds are not without risk. ʻHyperflexionʼ, where the individual is bent forward at the waist while seated, can severely restrict breathing and you must never use it. Hyperflexion is also dangerous if it happens in a kneeling position (Paterson and Leadbetter 1998). 10f Supine restraint Supine simply means ʻface upʼ when on the ground, and there are again many varieties of this procedure. It is sometimes suggested that supine restraint is safer than prone restraint but it may be associated with risks of a different type. It carries the risk of choking or inhaling vomit (Morrison et al 2001). Staff need to be aware of this danger. 10g Basket holds Basket holds again exist in several versions involving combinations of one or two people with the staff and children involved variously standing or sitting. Though bad outcomes have been reported, the risks associated with basket holds can be reduced. Two variations give cause for concern. Firstly, if you are doing a basket hold in a seated position the child must not be bent forward, as this will interfere with breathing. Secondly, staff can fall accidentally across a childʼs back (into a prone position) but continue to hold on. A basket hold should never be continued under these circumstances. Sometimes staff pull a childʼs hands across their chest from behind, and it is less risky practice to hold the childʼs hands down to their hips – this should be done without pulling the arms back, as compressing a childʼs abdominal area will compress the diaphragm and interfere with their ability to breathe. 76 Click here to returnto Contents Click here to return to Contents
  3. 3. 10 Areas of Danger and Concern 10h Pain compliance Pain compliance is not an acceptable practice in child care. Getting a child to go along with what you say by inflicting pain exists in a number of forms. These include, for example, deliberately using pressure across a joint or the use of pressure points. Pain increases the power professionals have over vulnerable people and so the possibility of abuse. At the same time the use of pain reduces the chance of building up a therapeutic relationship (Paterson et al. 2004). As a result, its use in child care is not acceptable. 10i Medication Children may be receiving medication for a range of physical or psychological disorders. Some forms of medication may increase the risk of a child experiencing problems after a restraint. All risk assessments should take account of the possible side effects of medication both generally and in the context of restraint (Hughes and Van Dusen 1993). 10j Conclusion It is service providers and not those who provide training in physically restraining children who are ultimately responsible for making sure that the methods used are appropriate and safe in their residential establishments. Their decisions will be guided by considering a wide range of issues, for example the needs of children who are accommodated and the nature of the services provided. However, all service providers should be working with their training providers towards reducing or getting rid of those procedures associated with a higher risk of problems discussed here. Individual staff remain personally responsible for their actions in individual situations. 77 Click here to returnto Contents Click here to return to Contents

×