Tags: They're Not Just for Prices Anymore

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

1 comments

Comments 1 - 1 of 1 previous next Post a comment

  • + jessenfelix jessenfelix 3 years ago
    I love this presentation. I learnt a lot about tags. Keep it up Gary.
Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

3 Favorites & 1 Group

Tags: They're Not Just for Prices Anymore - Presentation Transcript

  1. Tags: They're Not Just for Prices Anymore Gary S. Atwood March 25, 2007
  2. Welcome!
    • Gary Atwood
      • Reference Librarian, Springfield College
      • Former “Dixie”
    • Things to Note
      • Please ask questions!
      • No projector – you run the show
  3. What is a Tag? Tag: a descriptive label (keyword, term, phrase) that is attached to something (web site, picture, sound, etc.) so that it can be found later
  4. Where Do We Use Tags?
    • Del.icio.us (Ma.gnolia, Furl, etc.) – web sites
    • Flickr – photos
    • Technorati – blogs
    • Last.fm – Internet radio stations
    • CiteULike/Connotea – academic articles
    • See a huge list at 3Spots:
    • http://3spots.blogspot.com/2006/01/all-social-that-can-bookmark.html
  5. Who Is Tagging?
    • Pew Internet and American Life Survey
      • 28% of internet users have tagged or categorized content online such as photos, news stories, or blog posts
      • On a typical day online, 7% of internet users say that they tag or categorize online content
    Source: Pew Internet and American Life Project: Tagging - http:// www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Tagging.pdf
  6. Who Is Tagging? – Cont. Source: Pew Internet and American Life Project: Tagging - http:// www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Tagging.pdf
  7. Why Does This Matter? Source: Pew Internet and American Life Project: Tagging - http:// www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Tagging.pdf “ The act of tagging is likely to be embraced by a more mainstream population in the future because many organizations are making it easier to tag internet content.”
  8. Tagging – Nuts & Bolts
    • Go to http://del.icio.us
    • Click on Register link
    • Follow instructions to create an account
    • Write down your username and password!
    • See “How to Tag a Web Site” handout for instructions on using Del.icio.us
  9. OK, that’s neat, but what’s the big deal?
  10. Bookmarks - Limitations
    • Limited Flexibility
    • Limited Descriptive Information
    • Limited Mobility
  11. Bookmarks – Limitations Bookmarks, “have become 'information closets' that hold a jumble of sites people never seem to return to. Only hyper-organized users sort sites into folders, clean out dead links or click on inscrutable addresses to figure out why they were bookmarked in the first place.” Source: Laura Gordon-Murnane, “Social Bookmarking, Folksonomies, and Web 2.0 Tools,” Searcher , 14 (6), 2006.
  12. Tagging to the Rescue!
    • Very flexible
    • Enhanced descriptive information
    • Very mobile
    • Mashups
  13. But Wait, There’s More …
    • You can share your tags with other members
    • You can also see their tags
      • Explore by author
      • Explore by tag
    • This allows everyone to find resources that they were not aware of
  14. Social Bookmarking “… is the practice of saving bookmarks to a public Web site and ‘tagging’ them with keywords.” Source: Educause, “7 Things You Should Know About…Social Bookmarking” http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7001.pdf
  15. Additional Advantages
    • Most social bookmarking sites have the ability to rank pages based on popularity
    • Tags can be ranked also
      • Tag clouds
  16. A Searching We Will Go…
    • Toggle back to Del.icio.us
    • Type something into the search box
    • Check your results (Did you get any?)
      • Other users and their tags
      • Related tags
  17. Taggers Take On Google
    • Some social bookmarking advocates claim that tagging will enhance traditional search engines
    • Some even argue that it will actually replace search engines
  18. How Search Engines Work (the very condensed version)
    • Looks for your keywords in the index
    • Pulls out the pages that match your query
    • Ranks those pages based on:
      • Where keywords show up
      • How often they show up
      • Who’s linking to the site
      • Etc.
  19. Kryptonite for Search Engines “ No matter how many pages they index or how quickly they bring back results, they can’t put those words into context. They can find a specific word, but they can’t tell what it means.” Source: Heather Green, “Picking Up Where Search Leaves Off,” Business Week , (3928), April 11, 2005
  20. Tagging to the Rescue, Pt. 2
    • Taggers have looked at the site so the tags reflect the content (supposedly)
    • Good web sites get tagged by more people (again, supposedly)
      • Ex. Digg.com
    • You can see what the group thinks is important (which some find important)
  21. Hey, don’t we do that already?
  22. Cataloging - Weaknesses
    • Slow to adapt
    • Terms reflect the needs of the creators
    • Best for finding known items
    • High maintenance costs
    • Fairly inflexible
    Source: Laura Gordon-Murnane, “Social Bookmarking, Folksonomies, and Web 2.0 Tools,” Searcher , 14 (6), 2006.
  23. Folksonomy Source: Laura Gordon-Murnane, “Social Bookmarking, Folksonomies, and Web 2.0 Tools,” Searcher , 14 (6), 2006. “… a naturally created classification system which arises as a results of user based tagging.”
  24. Folksonomy - Strengths
    • Can respond very quickly to new concepts
    • Lend themselves to exploration
    • Are self-moderating and inclusive
    • Reflect the thinking of the users
    • Less expensive to maintain
    • Foster community among different groups
    Source: Laura Gordon-Murnane, “Social Bookmarking, Folksonomies, and Web 2.0 Tools,” Searcher , 14 (6), 2006.
  25. Folksonomy – Group Exercise
    • You are going to tag something
    • Come up with 3-5 tags
    • There are no right or wrong tags
    • Don’t hold back - Be creative!
  26. Folksonomy – Weaknesses
    • No standard keywords
    • No standardized structure
    • Tags can have multiple meanings
    • Keywords can have similar meanings
    • No hierarchical relationships
    • Tags can be “cliquish”
  27. Weaknesses Cont.
    • Limited by input requirements
    • Usually no spell check mechanism
    • Tag spam
      • “… misleading tags that are generated in order to increase the visibility of some resources or simply to confuse the user.”
      • Starting to be a big problem
    Source: George Koutrika, “Combating Spam in Tagging Systems,” http://www.resourceshelf.com/2007/02/21/new-research-paper-combating-spam-in-tagging-systems/
  28. So which one should we use?
  29. A Middle Way
    • Stop thinking “either-or”
    • Start thinking “and”
    • Tags should be “supplements to formal classification systems, not wholesale replacements.”
    Walt Crawford, “Folksonomy and Dichotomy,” Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large , http://cites.boisestate.edu/v6i4a.htm
  30. Is Anyone Doing It?
    • Flickr has some “ suggested ” tags that offer some general guidelines
    • Designate “trusted taggers” whose tags are given greater weight than those of other users
    Source: George Koutrika, “Combating Spam in Tagging Systems,” http://www.resourceshelf.com/2007/02/21/new-research-paper-combating-spam-in-tagging-systems/
  31. What About in Libraries?
    • University of California Libraries
      • Bibliographic Services Task Force
    • University of Pennsylvania
      • PennTags
    • Plymouth State University
      • Lamson Library OPAC
  32. Wrap Up
    • Tags are labels that can be applied to just about anything on the Internet
    • A significant % of people are tagging and it is going to grow over time
    • Tags allow you to find your stuff as well as other people’s stuff
    • Tagging will have an impact on how we search – we just don’t know how much yet
  33. Thanks for coming! Any Questions?

+ gary_atwoodgary_atwood, 3 years ago

custom

1116 views, 3 favs, 0 embeds more stats

Presentation on tagging and the relationship betwee more

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 1116
    • 1116 on SlideShare
    • 0 from embeds
  • Comments 1
  • Favorites 3
  • Downloads 0
Most viewed embeds

more

All embeds

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories

Groups / Events