I Want My Education My Way: Student Consumerism and the Impact on Higher Education

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    I Want My Education My Way: Student Consumerism and the Impact on Higher Education - Presentation Transcript

    1. I Want My Education My Way: Student Consumerism and the Impact on Higher Education Graham Garner EDLH 734 Trends and Issues in Higher Education
    2. Overview
      • What is a University?
      • What Students Wants: Autonomy or Conformity?
      • The Self-Esteem Factor
      • What For-Profits Offer
      • Evidence of Consumer Models
      • Commodification of Higher Education
      • Problems with Commodification
    3. What is a University?
      • A university exists to further knowledge, discover truth
      • Practical end is to create good citizens
      • Students are not products
      • “ Doing what it takes to succeed” is not a substitute for true inquiry and honesty
      • Customer model betrays true meaning of a university and instead makes it a degree mill
    4. Autonomy v. Conformity
      • A college education provides a conformist lifestyle
      • Brand of independence relying on conformity
      • Students expect a relatively struggle-free life because of their degree
      • We turn to pop culture and self to make learning interesting or relevant
      • This compromises giving students what they actually need to obtain what they want
      • She wonders if boredom is actually fear; students are overwhelmed
    5. The Self-Esteem Factor
      • University as theme park
      • Degree equates to validation as a human
      • Everyone expected to go to college
      • Students don’t care about academic learning
      • Multiculturalism is an example of diversity as a commodity
    6. What For-Profits Offer
      • Need
        • Career
        • Less academic, more practical
        • “ just-in-time” designed for working adults
        • Lack of extracurricular
      • Speed
        • Nimble
        • Scope
      • Ease
        • Flexible delivery
        • Learning is more hands-on
    7. Commodification of Higher Education
      • Consumer model removes faculty from shaping curriculum, standards and pedagogy
      • Values economic capital over academic capital
      • Makes instructor the commodity-producer and the student the consumer
      • Creates relationship of opposing interests
    8. Problems with Commodification
      • Hierarchy protects upper levels, hurts lower levels
      • Higher-level thinking for lower-level recitation
      • Puts more value on head count
      • Faith, trust and risk-taking removed from process
      • True disciplinary excellence requires time, persistence and hard work
      • Erosion of traditional disciplinary boundaries in favor of portability and transferability
    9. References
      • Boretz, E. (2004, Spring). Grade inflation and the myth of student consumerism. College Teaching , 52 (2), 42-46.
      • Cochrane, C. (2000, February). The Reflections of a Distance Learner 1977-1997. Open Learning , 15 (1), 17-34.
      • Germain, M., & Scandura, T. (2005, March). Grade Inflation And Student Individual Differences as Systematic Bias in Faculty Evaluations. Journal of Instructional Psychology , 32 (1), 58-67.
      • Gottfried, P. (2002, Spring). About Consumerist Education. Academic Questions , 15 (2), 53.
      • Harris, M. (2006, July). Out out, damned spot: General education in a market-driven institution. JGE: The Journal of General Education , 55 (3/4), 186-200.
      • Howard-Vital, M. (2006, January). The Appeal of For-Profit Institutions. Change , 38 (1), 68-71.
      • Kantrowitz, B. (2006, October 9). Is Your College a Lemon?. Newsweek , 148 (15), 58.
      • Kingsbury, A. (2005, January 17). Hot on the trail of academic fraud. U.S. News & World Report , 138 (2), 76-76.
      • Lumadue, R. (2006, July). When Graduate Degrees Prostitute the Educational Process: Degrees Gone Wild. Christian Higher Education , 5 (3), 263-278.
      • Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, I. (2005, May). Empowering participants or corroding learning? Towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education. Journal of Education Policy , 20 (3), 267-281.
      • Potts, M. (2005, June). The Consumerist Subversion of Education. Academic Questions , 18 (3), 54-64.
      • Whitney, B. (2003, September). Combating consumerism in the writing classroom. Critical Quarterly , 45 (3), 104.

    + Graham GarnerGraham Garner, 2 years ago

    custom

    1678 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The rise of issues such as degree mills, correspon more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1678
      • 1678 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 32
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories