Exploring formative assessment
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
2,319
On Slideshare
2,319
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
75
Comments
0
Likes
3

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Exploring Formative Assessment – Assessment for Learning Online Workshop
  • 2. Who will find this workshop useful?• Teachers• Syndicates / departments• AtoL facilitators How to use this workshop:• To update, review and/or reflect on formative assessment practice.• As a focus for professional development in exploring formative assessment.• To support AtoL in-depth programmes in schools.
  • 3. The word ‘assess’Comes from the Latin verb ‘assidere’ meaning‘to sit with’. In assessment one is supposed tosit with the learner. This implies it is something we do with and for students and not to students (Green, 1998)
  • 4. What are summative and formative assessment?The garden analogyIf we think of our children as plants …Summative assessment of the plants is the process of simplymeasuring them. It might be interesting to compare and analysemeasurements but, in themselves, these do not affect the growth ofthe plants.Formative assessment, on the other hand, is the equivalent offeeding and watering the plants appropriate to their needs - directlyaffecting their growth.
  • 5. Formative and summative assessmentFormative and summative assessment are interconnected. Theyseldom stand alone in construction or effect.The vast majority of genuine formative assessment is informal, withinteractive and timely feedback and response.It is widely and empirically argued that formative assessment has thegreatest impact on learning and achievement.
  • 6. Some definitionsFormative assessment“… often means no more than that the assessment is carried out frequently and is planned at the same time as teaching.” (Black and Wiliam, 1999)“… provides feedback which leads to students recognising the (learning) gap and closing it … it is forward looking …” (Harlen, 1998)“ … includes both feedback and self-monitoring.” (Sadler, 1989)“… is used essentially to feed back into the teaching and learning process.” (Tunstall and Gipps, 1996)
  • 7. Some definitionsSummative assessment“… assessment (that) has increasingly been used to sum up learning” (Black and Wiliam, 1999)“… looks at past achievements“… adds procedures or tests to existing work“... involves only marking and feedback grades to student“… is separated from teaching“… is carried out at intervals when achievement has to be summarised and reported.” (Harlen, 1998)
  • 8. How do you see assessment? Assessment point/taskActivity: After learningUse the listed terms as a starting During learningpoint to develop a representation Feedback(model, mind-map, concept map)of how you see the relationship Feed-forwardbetween summative and Learning continuumformative assessment. Of learningThis may form the basis for For learningprofessional discussion in your Looks backlearning community. Looks forward Review/reflect Improve/enhance
  • 9. What does the research say?In 1998 Paul Black and Dylan Wiliam of Kings College Londonpublished their wide-ranging analysis of research into classroom-based assessment:Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through ClassroomAssessmentFull texthttp://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/education/publications/blackbox.htmlSummary of research, with a professional reading activity
  • 10. The Black Box: findingsBlack and Wiliam’s research indicates that improving learning throughassessment depends on five deceptively simple factors: 1. Providing effective feedback to students. 2. Students’ active involvement in their own learning. 3. Adjusting teaching to take account of the results of assessment. 4. Recognising the profound influence of assessment on students’ motivation and self-esteem - both crucial influences on learning. 5. Ensuring pupils assess themselves and understand how to improve.
  • 11. Implications for classroom practice• Sharing learning goals with students.• Involving students in self-assessment.• Providing feedback that helps students recognise their next steps and how to take them.• Being confident that every student can improve.
  • 12. Self-evaluationRate yourself from: 5 – I do this consistently well to: 0 – I don’t do this at all• How well do you: – Share learning goals with students? – Involve students in self assessment? – Provide timely focused feedback?• Do you have confidence that every student in your class can improve?• Think now about some of the things that prevent us from assessing in a formative manner.
  • 13. Hattie on feedbackIn his 1999 inaugural professorial lecture John Hattie (University ofAuckland) noted:The most powerful single moderator that enhances achievement isfeedback.The simplest prescription for improving education must be ‘dollops offeedback’.In particular, this should be about:• how and why the student understands and misunderstands• what directions the student must take to improve.(For more on feedback, see PowerPoint ‘Giving Quality Feedback’)
  • 14. In summary…Practice drawn from the research base involves: Clarifying learning outcomes at the planning stage. Sharing learning outcomes with students. Encouraging students’ self-assessment against the learning outcomes. Focusing oral and written feedback on the learning outcomes of lessons and tasks. Organising individual student target-setting that builds on previous achievement as well as aiming for the next level up. Appropriate and effective questioning. Raising students’ self-esteem through the language of the classroom and the ways in which achievement is celebrated.
  • 15. What do we want for our students?The test of a successful education is not the amount of knowledgethat a student takes away from a school, but the appetite to knowand the capacity to learn.If a school sends out students with a desire for knowledge andsome idea of how to acquire and use it, it will have done its work.Too many students leave school with the appetite killed and themind loaded with undigested lumps of information.(Abbott, 1999)
  • 16. LinksThe following PowerPoint workshops may be found on TKI athttp://www.tki.org.nz/r/assessment/one/formative_e.php Planning for Formative Assessment For more on learning outcomes or intentions. Giving Quality Feedback For more on questioning and feedback. Teacher-Student Conversations that Promote Learning For more on questioning and feedbackhttp://www.tki.org.nz/r/assessment/two/self_and_peer_e.php Teaching the strategies of self and peer assessment For a self and peer assessment workshop
  • 17. This concludes this workshop.However, for those with a yen to delve deeper, thefollowing slides provide a theoretical perspective onassessment.
  • 18. A Theoretical Perspective on Assessment
  • 19. Convergent and divergent modelsTorrance and Pryor (1998) suggest a framework of convergent anddivergent models for formative assessment.Convergent assessment aims to discover whether the learner knows,understands or can do a pre-determined thing.Divergent assessment aims to discover what the learner knows,understands or can do.List the assessment methods used in your school/ classroom.
  • 20. The two approachesThe methods of assessment will vary according to whether the teacher seesthe task as convergent or divergent.Convergent Divergent• Tick-lists, can-do statements • Open recordings, narratives• Closed questions • Open-ended questions• Focus on contrasting errors with correct • Focus on miscues which give insights into responses the learner’s understanding• Judgmental, quantitative evaluation • Student as an initiator and recipient of• Student as a recipient of assessments assessment • Flexible or complex planning, with• Precise planning and an intention to alternatives stick to it • Descriptive rather than judgmental evaluation Match your methods with this list – which are convergent, which divergent?
  • 21. Identifying the differencesConvergent assessment might be seen less as formativeassessment than as repeated summative assessment, orcontinuous assessment.Divergent assessment correlates more closely to contemporarytheories of learning, and accommodates the complexity offormative assessment.
  • 22. What they representConvergent assessment Divergent assessment represents: represents:• A behaviourist view of learning. • A constructivist view of learning.• An intention to teach or assess the next pre-determined thing in • A non-linear development. a linear progression. • A view of assessment as• A view of assessment as accomplished jointly by the accomplished by the teacher. teacher and the student.
  • 23. Torrance and Pryor (1998) suggest approaching some assessmenttasks in a convergent manner, but also argue that appreciating the two assessment modes and moving from one to the other in a principled way, will enhance the formative impact of classroom assessment. How does this mesh with your view of learning? Share your ideas with your colleagues.
  • 24. Assessment referencesAbbott, J. (1999, January). Battery hens or free range chickens: What kind ofeducation for what kind of world? Journal of the 21st Century Learning Initiative, 1–12.Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning.Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5 (1), 7–74.Clarke, S. (2001). Unlocking formative assessment: Practical strategies forenhancing pupils’ learning in the primary classroom. London: Hodder andStoughton.Clarke, S., Timperley, H., & Hattie, J. (2003). Unlocking formative assessment:Practical strategies for enhancing pupils’ learning in the primary and intermediateclassroom (New Zealand ed.). Auckland: Hodder Moa Beckett.Gipps, C., McCallum, B., & Hargreaves, E. (2000). What makes a good primaryschool teacher? London: Routledge Falmer.
  • 25. Assessment referencesGreen, J. M. (1998, February). Constructing the way forward for all students. Aspeech delivered at “Innovations for Effective Schools” OECD/New Zealand jointfollow-up conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.Harlen, W. (1998) Classroom assessment: A dimension of purposes andprocedures. In K. Carr (Ed.), SAMEpapers (pp. 75–87). Hamilton, New Zealand:Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Educational Research, Universityof Waikato.Hattie, J. (1999, August). Influences on student learning. Inaugural lecture:Professor of Education, University of Auckland.Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems.Instructional Science, 18, 119–44.Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching andlearning in the classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formativeassessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22 (4).