SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Peterman v. Meeker, 855 So.2d 690 (2003)
28 Fla. L. Weekly D2287


                                                          Opinion
                   855 So.2d 690
        District Court of Appeal of Florida,              FULMER, Judge.
                  Second District.
                                                          John Russell Peterman, respondent below, appeals
      John Russell PETERMAN, Appellant,                   a final judgment for protection against domestic
                      v.                                  violence entered in favor of Nute Carl Meeker, Jr.,
       Nute Carl MEEKER, Jr., Appellee.                   under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2002). We
                                                          affirm.
            No. 2D03-548. |     Oct. 3, 2003.
                                                          Peterman and Meeker have been partners in a
Petitioner sought domestic violence injunction against    homosexual relationship for thirteen years and
same-sex partner. The Circuit Court, Pinellas County,     were living together in a house they jointly own.
John C. Lenderman, J., denied partner's motion to         The evidence showed that there were violent
dismiss and granted the injunction. Partner appealed.     episodes between these men in the recent past as
The District Court of Appeal, Fulmer, J., held that, as   their relationship was ending. Meeker sought an
matter of first impression, statute authorizing family    injunction, and Peterman's attorney filed a motion
or household members to seek domestic violence            to dismiss, arguing that section 741.30 does not
injunction applied to same-sex couples.                   protect homosexuals against domestic violence. The
                                                          trial court denied the motion to dismiss and granted
Affirmed.                                                 the injunction, holding that the statute was intended to
                                                          protect intimate partners.
 West Headnotes (1)
                                                          Section 741.30(1)(a) provides for a domestic violence
                                                          injunction to “[a]ny person described in paragraph
1       Protection of Endangered Persons                  (e), who is either the victim of domestic violence as
            Persons and Relationships Affected            defined in s. 741.28 or has reasonable cause to believe
        Protection of Endangered Persons                  he or she is in imminent danger of becoming the victim
            Parties, Right of Action, and Standing        of any act of domestic violence.” Section 741.30(1)(e)
                                                          provides that the injunction may be sought by family
        Statute permitting family or household
                                                          or household members, and *691 section 741.28(3)
        members to obtain a domestic violence
                                                          defines family or household members as:
        injunction applied to same-sex couples,
        even though same-sex couples could not                      spouses, former spouses, persons
        marry; statute defined family or household                  related by blood or marriage, persons
        members as persons “residing together                       who are presently residing together
        as if a family,” and provided that no                       as if a family or who have resided
        person was precluded from seeking relief                    together in the past as if a family,
        solely on the basis that the person was                     and persons who are parents of
        not a spouse. West's F.S.A. §§ 741.28(3),                   a child in common regardless of
        741.30(1)(a, e).                                            whether they have been married.
                                                                    With the exception of persons who
                                                                    have a child in common, the family
                                                                    or household members must be
                                                                    currently residing or have in the past
Attorneys and Law Firms                                             resided together in the same single
                                                                    dwelling unit.
*690 Mark Hanks, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.
                                                          Peterman argues that same-sex couples do not qualify
No appearance for Appellee Nute Carl Meeker, Jr.
                                                          as persons residing together as if a family because



               © 2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.                                   1
Peterman v. Meeker, 855 So.2d 690 (2003)
28 Fla. L. Weekly D2287

                                                             violence proceedings in homosexual relationship
same-sex couples cannot marry in the state of Florida.
                                                             based on statute defining members of unmarried
But section 741.30(1)(e) states: “No person shall be
                                                             couple as those who are living together or have
precluded from seeking injunctive relief pursuant to
                                                             formerly lived together); State v. Hadinger, 61 Ohio
this chapter solely on the basis that such a person is
                                                             App.3d 820, 573 N.E.2d 1191 (1991) (holding that
not a spouse.” Therefore, we conclude that the statute
                                                             domestic violence statute applied to partners in
does not exclude those persons who otherwise meet
                                                             same-sex relationship based on statute's definition
the requirements for a domestic violence injunction but
                                                             of person living as spouse to include person who
seek protection from a person of the same sex.
                                                             is otherwise cohabiting with offender; rejecting trial
There is no reported case in Florida on this issue,          court's imposition of requirement that such persons
but the several courts around the country that               must have the ability to marry before domestic
have addressed the issue have held that persons              violence statute applied).
in a same-sex relationship qualified for domestic
                                                             Affirmed.
violence protection under various state statutes. See
Glater v. Fabianich, 252 Ill.App.3d 372, 192 Ill.Dec.
136, 625 N.E.2d 96 (1993) (affirming domestic                STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
violence injunction in homosexual relationship based
on statute defining family or household member               Parallel Citations
in part as those who share or formerly shared
                                                             28 Fla. L. Weekly D2287
common dwelling); Ireland v. Davis, 957 S.W.2d 310
(Ky.Ct.App.1997) (2-1 decision) (reinstating domestic

End of Document                                           © 2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government
                                                                                                                Works.




               © 2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.                                       2

More Related Content

Similar to Peterman V Meeker

Obergefell v Hodges same-sex marriage only
Obergefell v Hodges same-sex marriage onlyObergefell v Hodges same-sex marriage only
Obergefell v Hodges same-sex marriage only
Paul Croushore
 
Judge Richard Young's Ruling Throwing Out Indiana's Ban on Same-Sex Marriageing
Judge Richard Young's Ruling Throwing Out Indiana's Ban on Same-Sex MarriageingJudge Richard Young's Ruling Throwing Out Indiana's Ban on Same-Sex Marriageing
Judge Richard Young's Ruling Throwing Out Indiana's Ban on Same-Sex Marriageing
Abdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Doma struck down full scotus decision
Doma struck down   full scotus decisionDoma struck down   full scotus decision
Doma struck down full scotus decision
DocJess
 
Kevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth Writing SampleKevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth
 
Kevin C Firth Writing Sample
Kevin C Firth Writing SampleKevin C Firth Writing Sample
Kevin C Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth
 
Kenneth Peace Presentation
Kenneth Peace PresentationKenneth Peace Presentation
Kenneth Peace Presentation
Stacie OBrien
 
Dewey_ValparaisoArticle
Dewey_ValparaisoArticleDewey_ValparaisoArticle
Dewey_ValparaisoArticle
Scott Dewey
 
Illinois Religious Freedom
Illinois Religious FreedomIllinois Religious Freedom
Illinois Religious Freedom
Amy Keeling
 
Mental health law common law remedies
Mental health law   common law remediesMental health law   common law remedies
Mental health law common law remedies
Anselm Eldergill
 
Page 22893 Wn.2d 228 (Wash. 1980)608 P.2d 635In th.docx
Page 22893 Wn.2d 228 (Wash. 1980)608 P.2d 635In th.docxPage 22893 Wn.2d 228 (Wash. 1980)608 P.2d 635In th.docx
Page 22893 Wn.2d 228 (Wash. 1980)608 P.2d 635In th.docx
alfred4lewis58146
 

Similar to Peterman V Meeker (15)

Obergefell v Hodges same-sex marriage only
Obergefell v Hodges same-sex marriage onlyObergefell v Hodges same-sex marriage only
Obergefell v Hodges same-sex marriage only
 
AAML 2015 Same Sex Marriage 4.24.15
AAML 2015 Same Sex Marriage 4.24.15AAML 2015 Same Sex Marriage 4.24.15
AAML 2015 Same Sex Marriage 4.24.15
 
Judge Richard Young's Ruling Throwing Out Indiana's Ban on Same-Sex Marriageing
Judge Richard Young's Ruling Throwing Out Indiana's Ban on Same-Sex MarriageingJudge Richard Young's Ruling Throwing Out Indiana's Ban on Same-Sex Marriageing
Judge Richard Young's Ruling Throwing Out Indiana's Ban on Same-Sex Marriageing
 
Shacking up Power Point.PDF
Shacking up Power Point.PDFShacking up Power Point.PDF
Shacking up Power Point.PDF
 
Supremo EEUU declara inconstitucional restriccion matrimonio homosexual
Supremo EEUU declara inconstitucional restriccion matrimonio homosexualSupremo EEUU declara inconstitucional restriccion matrimonio homosexual
Supremo EEUU declara inconstitucional restriccion matrimonio homosexual
 
Doma struck down full scotus decision
Doma struck down   full scotus decisionDoma struck down   full scotus decision
Doma struck down full scotus decision
 
Day Report
Day ReportDay Report
Day Report
 
Kevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth Writing SampleKevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth Writing Sample
 
Kevin C Firth Writing Sample
Kevin C Firth Writing SampleKevin C Firth Writing Sample
Kevin C Firth Writing Sample
 
Hindu law
Hindu lawHindu law
Hindu law
 
Kenneth Peace Presentation
Kenneth Peace PresentationKenneth Peace Presentation
Kenneth Peace Presentation
 
Dewey_ValparaisoArticle
Dewey_ValparaisoArticleDewey_ValparaisoArticle
Dewey_ValparaisoArticle
 
Illinois Religious Freedom
Illinois Religious FreedomIllinois Religious Freedom
Illinois Religious Freedom
 
Mental health law common law remedies
Mental health law   common law remediesMental health law   common law remedies
Mental health law common law remedies
 
Page 22893 Wn.2d 228 (Wash. 1980)608 P.2d 635In th.docx
Page 22893 Wn.2d 228 (Wash. 1980)608 P.2d 635In th.docxPage 22893 Wn.2d 228 (Wash. 1980)608 P.2d 635In th.docx
Page 22893 Wn.2d 228 (Wash. 1980)608 P.2d 635In th.docx
 

Peterman V Meeker

  • 1. Peterman v. Meeker, 855 So.2d 690 (2003) 28 Fla. L. Weekly D2287 Opinion 855 So.2d 690 District Court of Appeal of Florida, FULMER, Judge. Second District. John Russell Peterman, respondent below, appeals John Russell PETERMAN, Appellant, a final judgment for protection against domestic v. violence entered in favor of Nute Carl Meeker, Jr., Nute Carl MEEKER, Jr., Appellee. under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2002). We affirm. No. 2D03-548. | Oct. 3, 2003. Peterman and Meeker have been partners in a Petitioner sought domestic violence injunction against homosexual relationship for thirteen years and same-sex partner. The Circuit Court, Pinellas County, were living together in a house they jointly own. John C. Lenderman, J., denied partner's motion to The evidence showed that there were violent dismiss and granted the injunction. Partner appealed. episodes between these men in the recent past as The District Court of Appeal, Fulmer, J., held that, as their relationship was ending. Meeker sought an matter of first impression, statute authorizing family injunction, and Peterman's attorney filed a motion or household members to seek domestic violence to dismiss, arguing that section 741.30 does not injunction applied to same-sex couples. protect homosexuals against domestic violence. The trial court denied the motion to dismiss and granted Affirmed. the injunction, holding that the statute was intended to protect intimate partners. West Headnotes (1) Section 741.30(1)(a) provides for a domestic violence injunction to “[a]ny person described in paragraph 1 Protection of Endangered Persons (e), who is either the victim of domestic violence as Persons and Relationships Affected defined in s. 741.28 or has reasonable cause to believe Protection of Endangered Persons he or she is in imminent danger of becoming the victim Parties, Right of Action, and Standing of any act of domestic violence.” Section 741.30(1)(e) provides that the injunction may be sought by family Statute permitting family or household or household members, and *691 section 741.28(3) members to obtain a domestic violence defines family or household members as: injunction applied to same-sex couples, even though same-sex couples could not spouses, former spouses, persons marry; statute defined family or household related by blood or marriage, persons members as persons “residing together who are presently residing together as if a family,” and provided that no as if a family or who have resided person was precluded from seeking relief together in the past as if a family, solely on the basis that the person was and persons who are parents of not a spouse. West's F.S.A. §§ 741.28(3), a child in common regardless of 741.30(1)(a, e). whether they have been married. With the exception of persons who have a child in common, the family or household members must be currently residing or have in the past Attorneys and Law Firms resided together in the same single dwelling unit. *690 Mark Hanks, St. Petersburg, for Appellant. Peterman argues that same-sex couples do not qualify No appearance for Appellee Nute Carl Meeker, Jr. as persons residing together as if a family because © 2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1
  • 2. Peterman v. Meeker, 855 So.2d 690 (2003) 28 Fla. L. Weekly D2287 violence proceedings in homosexual relationship same-sex couples cannot marry in the state of Florida. based on statute defining members of unmarried But section 741.30(1)(e) states: “No person shall be couple as those who are living together or have precluded from seeking injunctive relief pursuant to formerly lived together); State v. Hadinger, 61 Ohio this chapter solely on the basis that such a person is App.3d 820, 573 N.E.2d 1191 (1991) (holding that not a spouse.” Therefore, we conclude that the statute domestic violence statute applied to partners in does not exclude those persons who otherwise meet same-sex relationship based on statute's definition the requirements for a domestic violence injunction but of person living as spouse to include person who seek protection from a person of the same sex. is otherwise cohabiting with offender; rejecting trial There is no reported case in Florida on this issue, court's imposition of requirement that such persons but the several courts around the country that must have the ability to marry before domestic have addressed the issue have held that persons violence statute applied). in a same-sex relationship qualified for domestic Affirmed. violence protection under various state statutes. See Glater v. Fabianich, 252 Ill.App.3d 372, 192 Ill.Dec. 136, 625 N.E.2d 96 (1993) (affirming domestic STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur. violence injunction in homosexual relationship based on statute defining family or household member Parallel Citations in part as those who share or formerly shared 28 Fla. L. Weekly D2287 common dwelling); Ireland v. Davis, 957 S.W.2d 310 (Ky.Ct.App.1997) (2-1 decision) (reinstating domestic End of Document © 2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. © 2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2