Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page1 of 22                                           1                  ...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page2 of 22                                                              ...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page3 of 22                                           1   2.   For each o...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page4 of 22                                           1   3.   For each o...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page5 of 22                                               4.   For each o...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page6 of 22                                               5.   For each o...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page7 of 22                                               7.   For each o...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page8 of 22                                               If you did not ...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page9 of 22                                               10. If you answ...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page10 of 22                                               APPLE’S TRADE ...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page11 of 22                                               If you did not...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page12 of 22                                               If you did not...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page13 of 22                                               If you did not...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page14 of 22                                               If you did not...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page15 of 22                                               19. If you fou...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page16 of 22                                           1        Vibrant (...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page17 of 22                                               22. If you fou...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page18 of 22                                               DAMAGES TO APP...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page19 of 22                                               SAMSUNG’S UTIL...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page20 of 22                                           1   27. If in resp...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page21 of 22                                               DAMAGES TO SAM...
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page22 of 22                                               PATENT EXHAUST...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Tentative verdict form1

19,547

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
19,547
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Tentative verdict form1

  1. 1. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page1 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 APPLE, INC., a California corporation, ) Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK )For the Northern District of California 11 Plaintiff, ) TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM v. ) United States District Court 12 ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ) 13 a Korean corporation; ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ) 14 a New York corporation; ) SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS ) 15 AMERICA, LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) 16 ) Defendants. ) 17 ) ) 18 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ) a Korean corporation; ) 19 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ) a New York corporation; ) 20 SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS ) AMERICA, LLC, ) 21 a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) 22 Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, ) v. ) 23 ) APPLE, INC., a California corporation, ) 24 ) Counterclaim-Defendant. ) 25 ) 26 We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them 27 under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case. 28 1 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  2. 2. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page2 of 22 FINDINGS ON APPLE’S CLAIMS 1 APPLE’S UTILITY AND DESIGN PATENT CLAIMS AGAINST SAMSUNG 2 1. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence 3 that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed Claim 19 of the ‘381 4 Patent? 5 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 6 Samsung Samsung Samsung 7 Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 8 Captivate (JX 1011) 9 Continuum (JX 1016) Droid Charge (JX 1025) 10 Epic 4G (JX 1012)For the Northern District of California 11 Exhibit 4G (JX 1028) United States District Court 12 Fascinate (JX 1013) Galaxy Ace (JX 1030) 13 Galaxy Prevail (JX 1022) 14 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) 15 Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 16 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) Galaxy Tab (JX 1036) 17 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and LTE) 18 (JX 1037) Gem (JX 1020) 19 Indulge (JX 1026) 20 Infuse 4G (JX 1027) Mesmerize (JX 1015) 21 Nexus S 4G (JX 1023) 22 Replenish (JX 1024) Vibrant (JX 1010) 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  3. 3. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page3 of 22 1 2. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or 2 Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed Claim 8 of the ’915 Patent? 3 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 4 Samsung Samsung Samsung 5 Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 6 Captivate (JX 1011) 7 Continuum (JX 1016) Droid Charge (JX 1025) 8 Epic 4G (JX 1012) 9 Exhibit 4G (JX 1028) 10 Fascinate (JX 1013) Galaxy Ace (JX 1030)For the Northern District of California 11 Galaxy Prevail (JX 1022) United States District Court 12 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) 13 Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 14 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) JX 1033 (Galaxy S II (T-Mobile)) 15 Galaxy Tab (JX 1036) 16 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and LTE) (JX 1037) 17 Gem (JX 1020) 18 Indulge (JX 1026) Infuse 4G (JX 1027) 19 Intercept (JX 1009) 20 Mesmerize (JX 1015) Nexus S 4G (JX 1023) 21 Replenish (JX 1024) 22 Transform (JX 1014) Vibrant (JX 1010) 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  4. 4. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page4 of 22 1 3. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or 2 Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed Claim 50 of the ’163 Patent? 3 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for 4 Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 5 Samsung Samsung Samsung Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications 6 Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 7 Captivate (JX 1011) Continuum (JX 1016) 8 Droid Charge (JX 1025) 9 Epic 4G (JX 1012) Exhibit 4G (JX 1028) 10 Fascinate (JX 1013)For the Northern District of California 11 Galaxy Ace (JX 1030) Galaxy Prevail (JX 1022) United States District Court 12 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) 13 Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 14 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) 15 JX 1033 (Galaxy S II (T-Mobile)) 16 Galaxy Tab (JX 1036) Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and LTE) 17 (JX 1037) Gem (JX 1020) 18 Indulge (JX 1026) 19 Infuse 4G (JX 1027) Intercept (JX 1009) 20 Mesmerize (JX 1015) 21 Nexus S 4G (JX 1023) 22 Replenish (JX 1024) Transform (JX 1014) 23 Vibrant (JX 1010) 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  5. 5. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page5 of 22 4. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence 1 that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), took action that it knew or should have known would induce STA or SEA to infringe the ’381, ’915, or ’163 Patents? 2 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for 3 Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 4 ‘381 Patent ‘915 Patent ‘163 Patent Accused Samsung Product (Claim 19) (Claim 8) (Claim 50) 5 Captivate (JX 1011) 6 Continuum (JX 1016) Droid Charge (JX 1025) 7 Epic 4G (JX 1012) 8 Exhibit 4G (JX 1028) Fascinate (JX 1013) 9 Galaxy Ace (JX 1030) 10 Galaxy Prevail (JX 1022)For the Northern District of California 11 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) United States District Court 12 Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 13 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) JX 1033 (Galaxy S II (T-Mobile)) 14 Galaxy Tab (JX 1036) 15 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and LTE) (JX 1037) 16 Gem (JX 1020) 17 Indulge (JX 1026) Infuse 4G (JX 1027) 18 Intercept (JX 1009) 19 Mesmerize (JX 1015) Nexus S 4G (JX 1023) 20 Replenish (JX 1024) 21 Transform (JX 1014) Vibrant (JX 1010) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  6. 6. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page6 of 22 5. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence 1 that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed the D’677 Patent? 2 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for 3 Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 4 Samsung Samsung Samsung Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications 5 Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 6 Fascinate (JX 1013) Galaxy Ace (JX 1030) 7 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) 8 Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 9 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) 10 Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) (JX 1033) Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) (JX 1034)For the Northern District of California 11 Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) (JX 1035) United States District Court 12 Galaxy S Showcase (i500) (JX 1017) Infuse 4G (JX 1027) 13 Mesmerize (JX 1015) 14 Vibrant (JX 1010) 15 16 6. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or 17 Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed the D’087 Patent? 18 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 19 Samsung Samsung Samsung 20 Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 21 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) 22 Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 23 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) (JX 1034) 24 Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) (JX 1035) 25 Infuse 4G (JX 1027) 26 Vibrant (JX 1010) 27 28 6 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  7. 7. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page7 of 22 7. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence 1 that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed the D’305 Patent? 2 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for 3 Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 4 Samsung Samsung Samsung Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications 5 Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 6 Captivate (JX 1011) Continuum (JX 1016) 7 Droid Charge (JX 1025) 8 Epic 4G (JX 1012) Fascinate (JX 1013) 9 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) 10 Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) Galaxy S Showcase (i500) (JX 1017)For the Northern District of California 11 Gem (JX 1020) United States District Court 12 Indulge (JX 1026) Infuse 4G (JX 1027) 13 Mesmerize (JX 1015) 14 Vibrant (JX 1010) 15 16 8. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or 17 Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed the D’889 Patent? 18 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 19 Samsung Samsung Samsung 20 Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 21 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and LTE) (JX 1037) 22 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) (JX 23 1038) 24 25 26 27 28 7 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  8. 8. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page8 of 22 If you did not answer “Yes” to any of Questions 1 through 8, please skip to Question 11, and do 1 not answer Questions 9 and 10. 2 9. If you found that Samsung Electronics America (SEA) or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) infringed in any of Questions 1 through 8, has Apple proven by a 3 preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), took action that it knew or should have known would induce SEA or SEC to infringe the D’677, D’087, 4 D’305, and/or D’889 Patents? 5 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 6 D’677 Patent D’087 Patent D’305 Patent D’889 7 Accused Samsung Product Patent 8 Captivate (JX 1011) Continuum (JX 1016) 9 Droid Charge (JX 1025) 10 Epic 4G (JX 1012) Fascinate (JX 1013)For the Northern District of California 11 Galaxy Ace (JX 1030) United States District Court 12 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) 13 Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 14 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) 15 Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) (JX 1033) 16 Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) 17 (JX 1034) Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) (JX 18 1035) Galaxy S Showcase (i500) 19 (JX 1017) Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and 20 LTE) (JX 1037) Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) 21 (JX 1038) 22 Gem (JX 1020) Indulge (JX 1026) 23 Infuse 4G (JX 1027) 24 Mesmerize (JX 1015) Vibrant (JX 1010) 25 26 27 28 8 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  9. 9. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page9 of 22 10. If you answered “Yes” to any of Questions 1 through 9, and thus found that any 1 Samsung entity has infringed any Apple patent(s), has Apple proven by clear and convincing evidence that the Samsung entity’s infringement was willful? 2 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for 3 Samsung).) 4 Samsung Samsung Samsung Apple Utility and Design Electronics Electronics Telecommunications 5 Patents Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 6 ’381 Patent (Claim 19) ’915 Patent (Claim 8) 7 ’163 Patent (Claim 50) 8 D’677 Patent D’087 Patent 9 D’305 Patent 10 D’889 PatentFor the Northern District of California 11 United States District Court 12 11. Has Samsung proven by clear and convincing evidence that Apple’s asserted utility and/or design patent claims are invalid? 13 ’381 Patent (Claim 19) Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 14 ’915 Patent (Claim 8) Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 15 ’163 Patent (Claim 50) Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 16 D’677 Patent Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 17 D’087 Patent Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 18 D’305 Patent Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 19 D’889 Patent Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  10. 10. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page10 of 22 APPLE’S TRADE DRESS CLAIMS AGAINST SAMSUNG 1 Protectability 2 12. Has Samsung proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Apple’s registered iPhone 3 trade dress ’983 is not protectable? 4 Yes (not protectable – for Samsung) _____ No (protectable – for Apple) _________ 5 13. Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Apple’s unregistered trade 6 dresses are protectable? 7 (Please answer with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung).) 8 Apple Trade Dresses Protectable 9 Unregistered iPhone 3 Trade Dress Unregistered Combination iPhone Trade Dress 10 Unregistered iPad/iPad 2 Trade DressFor the Northern District of California 11 United States District Court 12 Trade Dress Dilution 13 14. Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Apple’s trade dresses are 14 famous? 15 (Please answer with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung).) 16 Apple Trade Dresses Famous 17 Registered iPhone Trade Dress 18 Unregistered iPhone 3 Trade Dress Unregistered Combination iPhone Trade Dress 19 Unregistered iPad/iPad 2 Trade Dress 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  11. 11. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page11 of 22 If you did not find the registered iPhone trade dress protectable and famous, please skip to 1 Question 16, and do not answer Question 15. 2 15. If you found the registered iPhone trade dress protectable and famous, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung 3 Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has diluted the registered iPhone trade dress? 4 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for 5 Samsung).) 6 Samsung Samsung Samsung Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications 7 Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 8 Captivate (JX 1011) Continuum (JX 1016) 9 Droid Charge (JX 1025) 10 Epic 4G (JX 1012) Fascinate (JX 1013)For the Northern District of California 11 Galaxy Prevail (JX 1022) United States District Court 12 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) 13 Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 14 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) 15 Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) (JX 1033) Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) (JX 1034) 16 Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) (JX 1035) 17 Galaxy S II Showcase (i500) (JX 1017) 18 Infuse 4G (JX 1027) Mesmerize (JX 1015) 19 Vibrant (JX 1010) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  12. 12. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page12 of 22 If you did not find the unregistered iPhone 3 trade dress protectable and famous, please skip to 1 Question 17, and do not answer Question 16. 2 16. If you found the unregistered iPhone 3 trade dress protectable and famous, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that 3 Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has diluted the unregistered iPhone 3 trade dress? 4 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for 5 Samsung).) 6 Samsung Samsung Samsung Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications 7 Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 8 Captivate (JX 1011) Continuum (JX 1016) 9 Droid Charge (JX 1025) 10 Epic 4G (JX 1012) Fascinate (JX 1013)For the Northern District of California 11 Galaxy Prevail (JX 1022) United States District Court 12 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) 13 Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 14 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) 15 Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) (JX 1033) Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) (JX 1034) 16 Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) (JX 1035) 17 Galaxy S II Showcase (i500) (JX 1017) 18 Infuse 4G (JX 1027) Mesmerize (JX 1015) 19 Vibrant (JX 1010) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  13. 13. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page13 of 22 If you did not find the unregistered Combination iPhone trade dress protectable and famous, 1 please skip to Question 18, and do not answer Question 17. 2 17. If you found the unregistered Combination iPhone trade dress protectable and famous, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence 3 that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has diluted the unregistered Combination 4 iPhone trade dress? 5 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung).) 6 Samsung Samsung Samsung 7 Accused Samsung Product Electronics Electronics Telecommunications Co., Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 8 Captivate (JX 1011) 9 Continuum (JX 1016) Droid Charge (JX 1025) 10 Epic 4G (JX 1012)For the Northern District of California 11 Fascinate (JX 1013) United States District Court 12 Galaxy Ace (JX 1030) Galaxy Prevail (JX 1022) 13 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) 14 Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 15 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) 16 Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) (JX 1033) 17 Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) (JX 1034) Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) (JX 1035) 18 Galaxy S II Showcase (i500) (JX 1017) 19 Infuse 4G (JX 1027) Mesmerize (JX 1015) 20 Vibrant (JX 1010) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  14. 14. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page14 of 22 If you did not find the unregistered iPad/iPad2 trade dress protectable and famous, please skip to 1 Question 19, and do not answer Question 18. 2 18. If you found the unregistered iPad/iPad 2 trade dress protectable and famous, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that 3 Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has diluted the unregistered iPad/iPad 2 trade 4 dress? 5 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung).) 6 Samsung Samsung Samsung 7 Accused Samsung Electronics Co., Electronics Telecommunications Product Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 8 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi 9 and LTE) (JX 1037) Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G 10 LTE) (JX 1038)For the Northern District of California 11 United States District Court 12 If you did not answer “Yes” to any of Questions 15 through 18, please skip to Question 21, and 13 do not answer Questions 19 and 20. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  15. 15. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page15 of 22 19. If you found that Samsung Electronics America (SEA) or Samsung Telecommunications 1 America (STA) infringed in any of Questions 15 through 18, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung 2 Electronics Co. (SEC) took action that it knew or should have known would induce SEA or STA to dilute any of the Apple trade dresses? 3 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for 4 Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.) 5 Registered Unregistered Unregistered Unregistered Accused Samsung iPhone iPhone 3 Combination iPad/iPad 2 6 Product Trade Dress Trade Dress iPhone Trade Dress Trade Dress 7 Captivate (JX 1011) 8 Continuum (JX 1016) 9 Droid Charge (JX 10 1025) Epic 4G (JX 1012)For the Northern District of California 11 Fascinate (JX 1013) United States District Court 12 Galaxy Ace (JX 1030) 13 Galaxy Prevail (JX 14 1022) Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 15 1007) 16 Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) Galaxy S II (AT&T) 17 (JX 1031) 18 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) 19 Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) (JX 1033) 20 Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) (JX 1034) 21 Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) (JX 1035) 22 Galaxy S II Showcase 23 (i500) (JX 1017) Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi 24 and LTE) (JX 1037) 25 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) (JX 1038) 26 Infuse 4G (JX 1027) 27 Mesmerize (JX 1015) 28 15 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  16. 16. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page16 of 22 1 Vibrant (JX 1010) 2 20. If you answered “Yes” to any of Questions 15 through 18, and thus found that any Samsung entity has diluted any Apple trade dress(es), has Apple proven by clear and 3 convincing evidence that the Samsung entity’s dilution was willful? 4 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung).) 5 Samsung Samsung Samsung 6 Asserted Trade Dress Electronics Co., Electronics Telecommunications Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 7 Registered iPhone Trade 8 Dress Unregistered iPhone 3 9 Trade Dress 10 Unregistered Combination iPhone Trade DressFor the Northern District of California 11 Unregistered iPad/iPad 2 Trade Dress United States District Court 12 13 14 Trade Dress Infringement 15 If you did not find the unregistered iPad/iPad2 trade dress protectable, please skip to Question 16 24, and do not answer Questions 21 through 23. 17 21. If you found the unregistered iPad/iPad2 trade dress protectable, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung 18 Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed the unregistered iPad/iPad2 trade 19 dress? 20 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung).) 21 Samsung Samsung Samsung 22 Asserted Trade Dress Electronics Co., Electronics Telecommunications Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 23 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and LTE) (JX 1037) 24 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) (JX 1038) 25 26 If you did not answer “Yes” to any of Question 21, please skip to Question 24, and do not answer 27 Questions 22 and 23. 28 16 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  17. 17. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page17 of 22 22. If you found that Samsung Electronics America (SEA) or Samsung Telecommunications 1 America (STA) infringed in any of Question 21, for each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC) 2 took action that it knew or should have known would induce SEA or STA to infringe Apple’s unregistered iPad/iPad 2 trade dress? 3 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for 4 Samsung).) 5 Unregistered Accused Samsung Product iPad/iPad 2 Trade 6 Dress 7 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and LTE) (JX 1037) 8 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) (JX 1038) 9 If you did not answer “Yes” to any of Question 21 and 22, please skip to Question 24, and do not 10 answer Question 23.For the Northern District of California 11 23. If you answered “Yes” to any of Questions 21-22, and thus found that any Samsung entity has infringed Apple’s unregistered iPad/iPad 2 trade dress, has Apple proven by United States District Court 12 clear and convincing evidence that the Samsung entity’s infringement was willful? 13 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for Samsung).) 14 Samsung Samsung Samsung 15 Asserted Trade Dress Electronics Co., Electronics Telecommunications Ltd. America, Inc. America, LLC 16 Unregistered iPad/iPad 2 17 Trade Dress 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  18. 18. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page18 of 22 DAMAGES TO APPLE FROM SAMSUNG (IF APPLICABLE) 1 2 24. What is the total dollar amount that Apple is entitled to receive from Samsung on the claims on which you have ruled in favor of Apple? 3 $______________________________________. 4 5 25. For the total dollar amount in your answer to Question 24, please provide the dollar 6 breakdown by product. 7 Accused Samsung Product Amount Captivate (JX 1011) 8 Continuum (JX 1016) 9 Droid Charge (JX 1025) 10 Epic 4G (JX 1012) Exhibit 4G (JX 1028)For the Northern District of California 11 Fascinate (JX 1013) United States District Court 12 Galaxy Ace (JX 1030) Galaxy Prevail (JX 1022) 13 Galaxy S (i9000) (JX 1007) 14 Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX 1031) 15 Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX 1032) 16 Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) (JX 1033) 17 Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) (JX 1034) Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) (JX 1035) 18 Galaxy S Showcase (i500) (JX 1017) 19 Galaxy Tab (JX 1036) 20 Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and LTE) (JX 1037) Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) (JX 1038) 21 Gem (JX 1020) 22 Indulge (JX 1026) 23 Infuse 4G (JX 1027) Intercept (JX 1009) 24 Mesmerize (JX 1015) 25 Nexus S 4G (JX 1023) Replenish (JX 1024) 26 Transform (JX 1014) 27 Vibrant (JX 1010) 28 18 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  19. 19. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page19 of 22 SAMSUNG’S UTILITY PATENT CLAIMS AGAINST APPLE 1 26. For each of the following products, has Samsung proven by a preponderance of the 2 evidence that Apple infringed the indicated Samsung utility patent claims? 3 (Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Samsung), or with an “N” for “no” (for Apple). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out. ) 4 Patent 5 Claim ‘460 1 6 7 Patent Claim ‘893 8 10 9 Patent Claim ‘711 9 10For the Northern District of California 11 Claim United States District Court 15 ‘941 Patent 12 13 Claim 10 14 15 Claim 16 16 ‘516 Patent 17 Claim 18 15 19 (JX1055 and 1057 and JX 4th Gen. (JX iPhone 3GS iPod Touch 20 iPhone 3G (JX 1053) iPad2 3G JX 1056) (JX 1054 (JX 1050 Accused iPhone 4 Product and JX and JX Apple 1076) 1051) 1077) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  20. 20. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page20 of 22 1 27. If in response to Question No. 26 you found that Apple has infringed any Samsung patent(s), has Samsung proven by clear and convincing evidence that Apple’s 2 infringement was willful? 3 ‘516 Patent 4 Claim 15: Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) Claim 16: Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 5 ‘914 Patent 6 Claim 10: Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) Claim 15: Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 7 8 ‘711 Patent Claim 9: Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 9 ‘893 Patent 10 Claim 10: Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple)For the Northern District of California 11 ‘460 Patent United States District Court 12 Claim 1: Yes ______ (for Samsung) No ______ (for Apple) 13 28. Has Apple proven by clear and convincing evidence that Samsung’s asserted utility 14 patent claims are invalid? 15 ‘516 Patent 16 Claim 15: Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) Claim 16: Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 17 ‘914 Patent 18 Claim 10: Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) Claim 15: Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 19 20 ‘711 Patent Claim 9: Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 21 ‘893 Patent 22 Claim 10: Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 23 ‘460 Patent 24 Claim 1: Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 25 26 27 28 20 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  21. 21. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page21 of 22 DAMAGES TO SAMSUNG FROM APPLE (IF APPLICABLE) 1 29. What is the total dollar amount that Samsung is entitled to receive from Apple for 2 Apple’s utility patent infringement claims on the ‘516 and ‘941 patents? 3 $______________________________________. 4 5 30. What is the total dollar amount that Samsung is entitled to receive from Apple for Apple’s utility patent infringement claims on the ‘711, ‘893, and ‘460 patents? 6 $______________________________________. 7 8 31. For the total dollar amounts in your answers to Question Nos. 29 and 30, please provide 9 the breakdown by product. 10 Accused Samsung Product Amount iPhone 3G (JX 1053)For the Northern District of California 11 iPhone 3GS (JX 1054 and JX 1076) United States District Court 12 iPhone 4 (JX1055 and JX 1056) iPad2 3G (JX 1050 and JX 1051) 13 iPod Touch 4th Gen. (JX 1057 and JX 1077) 14 15 BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS AND ANTITRUST 16 32. Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung breached its contractual obligations by failing to timely disclose its intellectual property rights 17 (“IPR”) during the creation of the UMTS standard or by failing to license its “declared essential” patents on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms? 18 Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 19 20 33. Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung has violated Section 21 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act by monopolizing one or more technology markets related to the UMTS standard? 22 Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 23 24 34. If you answered “Yes” to Question No. 32 or Question No. 33, what is the dollar amount that Apple is entitled to receive from Samsung for Samsung’s antitrust violation and/or 25 breach of contract? 26 $______________________________________. 27 28 21 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM
  22. 22. Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1870 Filed08/20/12 Page22 of 22 PATENT EXHAUSTION 1 35. Has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung is barred by patent 2 exhaustion from enforcing the following Samsung patents against Apple? 3 ’516 Patent Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 4 ’914 Patent Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 5 6 WAIVER 7 36. Has Apple proven by clear and convincing evidence that Samsung has waived its rights to enforce the following Samsung patents against Apple? 8 ’516 Patent Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 9 ’914 Patent Yes ______ (for Apple) No ______ (for Samsung) 10For the Northern District of California 11 United States District Court 12 Have the presiding juror sign and date this form. 13 14 Signed:_____________________________________ Date:_______________________________ 15 PRESIDING JUROR 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM

×