Communication Strategies in synchronous CMC and face-to-face interactions - Presentation Transcript
Communication strategies in synchronous CMC and face-to-face interaction Cristina Palomeque Faculty of Education EUROCALL 2007 – Coleraine, Northern Ireland
Index
Aims
Framework of the study
Research Questions
Data collection
Results
Conclusions
Future research
Aims of this study
To describe and compare the communication strategies (CS) used in online synchronous interaction and
face-to-face interaction
To provide an opportunity for learners to practice the target language out of class .
To help learners engage in face-to-face interaction through practice in CMC
Framework of the study
Interaction hypothesis (Long, 1983) – negotiated interaction - language learning
CMC - negotiated interaction (Lee, 2001)
Communicative competence (Hymes, 1971) - language learning through use
Strategic competence: communication strategies
Framework of the study
Language use, embracing language learning, comprises the actions perfomed by persons who (…) develop a range of competences, both general and in particular communicative language competences (…) activating those strategies which seem most appropriate to carrying out the tasks to be accomplished (…)
CEFR (2001: 9)
Research Questions
RQ 1: What communication strategies do learners employ during task-based synchronous online interaction and during face-to-face interaction?
RQ 2: How do students deal with the distance factor in synchronous text-based online interaction? How do they achieve proximity?
Data collection: Context
University of Barcelona
A group of 1st year university students
Training to be primary teachers of English
Native speakers of Catalan and/or Spanish
English as a Foreign Language I (B2)
Heterogeneous level of proficiency
Blended learning: class + VLE (Moodle)
Assessment: exam + portfolio
Data Collection: Tasks
Chosen topic: should people be allowed to have weapons?
Discussion task in groups of 4 in a text-based chat
Post their findings and answer to other classmates through a forum
Face-to-face debate on the subject
“ For and against” composition
CS found in this study: Repair strategies
Self-repair
AG: imagine you hear a sound at night... / during the night
Other-repair
RA: countries of first world sells warm to countries third world
IC: Weapons you mean, don't you?
CS found in this study: Understanding (input)
Expressing non-understanding
IC: Don't you just love being a guinea pig ?
RA: guinea pig. sorry but i don´t understand
Asking for clarification
MP: can you xplain?
CS found in this study: Understanding (output)
Comprehension check
RA: I don’t sure that you understand me
Rephrasing
IC: and what do they say 'bout peoplo who dies? I mean citizens
MG: sorry
IG: I mean … in America there're a lot of people who have died due to guns and things like that...do the NRA say sth about it??
Definition / Explanation
IC: have U seen Bowling for Colombine??
MG: no
IC: okey, it's quite interesting to see. It's a movie...
CS found in this study: Help
Direct appeal for help
IC: girls, how can I add some faces, smiles and things like these?? no idea lol I'm awful with computers!!
Indirect appeal for help
IC: and what do they say 'bout people who dies? I mean citizens
MG: sorry
CS found in this study: L1-based strategies
Code-switching
RA : no te rias por mis faltas,OK?
Literal translation
AF : it sounds to me but I haven’t seen it
Foreignizing
AG: some studios shown that people who have got weapons, use them not only at home... but also in the street
CS found in this study: Word modification
Similar sounding words
RA: countries of first world sells warm to countries third world
Word creation
CC : A man was driving with her car his car and he choked with a policeman car
CS found in this study: Miscellaneous
Message abandonment
AG: do you remember Farenheit 9/11?
AF: I haven't seen it...
AG: no matter
Fillers
AF: wel l... if you want we can start and they will join us then...
Imitation
IC: I can't believe that finally we're talking about the same thing.. .lol : )
MG: Gema, do you like the guns? I don't belive it. You are a dangerous girl! Lol
CS found in this study: Paralinguistic strategies
Capitalizing
Emoticons
Onomatopeia
Contextual cues
Abbreviation
Punctuation
Gestures and mime (debate)
Results
RQ 1: What communication strategies do learners employ during task-based synchronous online interaction and during face-to-face interaction?
Results - RQ1 - Chat
Most used chat communication strategies:
Paralinguistic (56%)
Fillers (10%)
Self-correction (7%)
Comprehension checks (5%)
Results - RQ1 - Chat
Paralinguistic strategies
Punctuation - MG: safe??????????????
Abbreviations - IC: What 'bout the NRA? tell me sth 'bout it please
Results - RQ1 - Chat
2. Fillers
Gain time: well
AF: well... if you want we can start and they will join us then...
Dynamize interaction: OK
IC: okey, well ladies!! c'mon
Results - RQ1 - Chat
3. Self-correction
Mistype - AB: Hello Laura, how are yoy ? / you?
Results - RQ 1 - Debate
Most used debate communication strategies:
Paralinguistic (38%)
Fillers (27%)
Self-correction (13%)
Literal translation (6%)
Results RQ1 - debate
1. Paralinguistic
Mime (80%)
Emphasis (20%)
Results RQ1 - debate
2. Fillers
Thinking: umm, ahh
Gaining time: OK, I mean, I don’t know, whatever
- IG: OK umm my name is Irene
- AF: I don’t know anybody but I saw it on TV or whatever
Results RQ1 - debate
3. Self-correction
Form
- IG: you think that weapons is not are not the problem
Meaning
- IC: weapons are really useful... I mean... weapons are not useful for the dialogue
Results - RQ2
RQ 2: How do students deal with the distance factor in synchronous text-based online interaction? How do they achieve proximity?
Results - RQ2
Results - RQ2
Results - RQ2 Non-task related interaction
Results and conclusions
Similar CS in chat and debate.
Great ammount of paralinguistic strategies and self-correction.
Absence of other-correction .
Students adjusted their input/output according to their interlocutor.
Students used a number of strategies during the chat to achieve proximity .
Different degree of participation in chat and debate different tasks should be designed to cater for different learning styles.
Students’ opinion
Gathered through questionnaires and portfolio comments
Positive experience
Chat:
Helped them organize ideas
Helped them learn new language
Provided a comfortable environment to speak in
Was not as immediate or as close as a face-to-face conversation
Debate
Sense of achievement as they were able to communicate their ideas
Some did not participate because of their shyness and perceived lack of proficiency.
Future research: Virtual Worlds
What is it?
Online environment.
2D or 3D immersive enviroment
Participants - avatars
Participants control and design their avatars and world
Users can interact with other users and create objects.
Freedom to do things you cannot do in “real life”.
Examples: Second Life, Active Worlds
Future research: Second Life
3D virtual reality platform
Synchronous text and voice interaction
Avatar
Navigation: walk, run, fly, ‘teleport’
Participants have an active role in building in the virtual world
Future research: Second Life
Future research
CS in virtual worlds
Cultural differences in the use of CS
Different way of communication
Add on: sense of “presence”
Text-based and voice different learning styles
Learning by doing
Thank you for your attention! Cristina Palomeque [email_address]
0 comments
Post a comment