| http://www.cultofmac.com |
1806 |
| http://thenextweb.com |
563 |
| http://maximac.se |
198 |
| http://www.bijlbrand.nl |
125 |
| http://highereducationmanagement.wordpress.com |
104 |
| http://www.publishr.nl |
99 |
| http://www.ebouquin.fr |
97 |
| http://umacuchi.wordpress.com |
77 |
| http://applenoticias.blogspot.com |
75 |
| http://blogs.journalism.co.uk |
64 |
| http://itdoesntgetanybetterthanthis.co.uk |
47 |
| http://www.slideshare.net |
44 |
| http://pyrsf.blogspot.com |
43 |
| http://blog.roelandp.nl |
38 |
| http://www.blog-entrenet.com |
37 |
| http://vint.sogeti.nl |
37 |
| http://www.maximac.se |
30 |
| http://www.lapressegratuite.com |
23 |
| http://wokblog.wordpress.com |
21 |
| http://www.marketing-pub.fr |
13 |
| http://www.kizel.com |
9 |
| http://cultofmac.com |
8 |
| http://samsykes.com |
6 |
| http://wildfire.gigya.com |
6 |
| http://sparkplug9.com |
6 |
| http://elevated.egloos.com |
5 |
| http://arjanelfassed.tumblr.com |
4 |
| http://applenoticias.blogspot.com.es |
4 |
| http://scottpurdie.com |
4 |
| http://asteriusonline.com |
4 |
| http://feeds.feedburner.com |
3 |
| http://translate.googleusercontent.com |
3 |
| http://www.netvibes.com |
3 |
| http://chocolatecastle.tumblr.com |
3 |
| http://bbs.macorz.cn |
2 |
| http://www.applenoticias.blogspot.com |
2 |
| http://feeds2.feedburner.com |
2 |
| http://www.pyrsf.blogspot.com |
2 |
| resource://brief-content |
1 |
| http://www.google.com |
1 |
| http://www.scieng.net |
1 |
| http://xss.yandex.net |
1 |
| http://fever.himynameisjonas.net |
1 |
| http://www.blogger.com |
1 |
| http://indypendancellc.createbot.com |
1 |
| http://127.0.0.1:8795 |
1 |
| http://www.customermedia.nl |
1 |
Agree. Why subscribe to a newsletter with >50% content that you don't read? In my presentation I refer to Genius (the Apple recommendation engine). Based on your profile and behaviour you will get recommendations. But you take it one step further: people can subscribe to 'smart feeds' with relevant content and pay for that. Would be very nice indeed. But I also think this content will come from more then one publisher, that could make pricing more difficult from a single publisher perspective. 2 years ago Reply
@John, I like your idea for the opt-in and you can even take this one step further. Because content in articles is nowadays very good interpretable mainly thanks to Google, so that the the distributor (the newsstand shop) can supply me pro-actively with relevant content that I like. Subsequently, the shop can offer a subscription for this service. Articles then come to me via a profile in stead of the traditional pull mechanism where I must first search and then choose. In time, the shop understands my needs more and more and offers me articles with increasing relevancy and solves my search-problem whereas the shop builds the relationship. 2 years ago Reply
In my presentation I also mention 'in article payments' (similar to the in app purchages). I think here's a hugh potential for the impulse purchages you mention. Publishers can sell there own stuff (content) or stuff from others. 2 years ago Reply
It's also possible for device-owner me to opt in to a system that would ID me and make impulse purchases much more possible — and this is key. Right now, the store owners are not motivated to loosen up. Totally agree that everyone needs to get over magazine-ads-are-irreplaceable, but the idea is to re-create the rich experience — not necessarily duplicate it. 2 years ago Reply
Regarding your comments on the advertisers interest for rich formats. To enhance readability and usablity Apple will have restrictions to the UI (just as on the iPhone). But if they're smart they will have a couple of different options for advertisements including a rich one. 2 years ago Reply
@Donna @Menno thanx for the compliments! 2 years ago Reply
Congrats! 2 years ago Reply
Great presentation. I believe at least 90% of your story will become reality. Too bad publishers are still years away from accepting the fact that they have to change their business models NOW!
When this starts, the publishers will have a 'followers' position instead of a leading position in the publishing industry.
Keep up the good work!
Best,
Menno 2 years ago Reply