Slideshare.net (beta)

 
Post: 
Myspace Hi5 Friendster Xanga LiveJournal Facebook Blogger Tagged Typepad Freewebs BlackPlanet gigya icons



All comments

Add a comment on Slide 1

If you have a SlideShare account, login to comment; else you can comment as a guest


Showing 1-50 of 14 (more)

Predictive Markets & Experimental Results

From fred325i, 1 year ago

Predictive Markets & Experimental Results

3947 views  |  1 comment  |  12 favorites
 

Tags

brainjuicer creativity innovation market research marketing research wisdomofcrowds current issues wisdomofcrows crowds

more

 
 
 
 

Privacy InfoNew!

This slideshow is Public

 
Embed in your blog
Embed (wordpress.com)
custom

Slideshow Statistics
Total Views: 3947
on Slideshare: 3947
from embeds: 0* * Views from embeds since 21 Aug, 07

Slideshow transcript

Slide 1: The MindReading Agency Predictive Markets & the Wisdom of Crowds Experiments A Market Research Project by BrainJuicer® Produced December 2005 December 2005 Potency  Objectives  Glossary  PI  Ratings  Attributes

Slide 2: Extraordinary delusions and the Madness of Crowds, Charles MacKay (1841)

Slide 3: The Wisdom of Crowds – How the Many Can Be Smarter than the Few, James Surowiecki (2004)

Slide 4: • Diversity • Independence • Faithful aggregation Enables a crowd to be wise

Slide 5: Collective Guess Actual Weight = 1197 lbs = 1198 lbs Galton’s surprise findings.

Slide 6: Rockwell – Down 3% Lockheed – Down 3% Martin Marietta – Down 3% Morton Thiokol – Down 12% How did the market know?

Slide 7: Qu. Is there a more efficient alternative?

Slide 8: X 596 Polls ¾ (1988 - 2000) IEM - The original decision market

Slide 9: French – Referendum 29th May – Betting 28th May – Polls 30th May - Result BetFair (70% turn out) IPSOS Non 51.0% Non 53.6% Non 54.9% Oui 49.0% Oui 46.4% Oui 45.1%

Slide 11: 3 hypotheses to test on… Predictive Markets’ & Wisdom of Crowds 2. A random collection of 500 individuals will be as accurate as a targeted sample 4. Predictive Markets will be as accurate as monadics 6. The ‘crowd’ answering for the market will be as accurate as people answering for themselves

Slide 12: The Experiments Monadic Tests of 3, 10, 15 Predictive Markets of 3, & 20 ideas, with matched 10, 15 & 20 ideas, with targeted samples of 100 diverse ‘crowds’ of 500

Slide 13: Predictive Market 1 - UK Top Two Box Purchase Intention Results – Predictive Market 2* Monadic Test Predictive Market 2* New Product Significant with matched samples of With diverse group of 500 Concepts Differences 100 in the target market people - *no betting (Top 2 Box Purchase Intent) (Top 2 Box Purchase Intent) A 85 85 B 83 76 + C 81 80 D 78 86 E 74 70 67 67 UK Norms (top 2 box) F 64 28 *** G 64 28 *** H 54 35 *** I 49 45 J 43 16 *** Respondent Base Sizes: Monadic = 100 per cell / Predictive Market *No Betting = 507  A diverse crowd will be as accurate as a targeted sample  A ‘Predictive Market’ will be as accurate as a monadic test  Answering for the market as accurate as answering for oneself

Slide 14: Predictive Market Experiment 2 - USA Monadic Predictive Market Monadic vs. Rank Def + Prob Buy Rank Def + Prob Buy Research Mkt Mon. Concept 100 tgt per concept R.Mkt Crowd of 500 Sig. Difference 1 Fade Out 83 1 87 2 Odor Eliminator 76 2 78 3 Garden Lights 74 8 67 4 Exit Alert 74 3 76 5 Nightglow 72 5 71 6 Two in One 70 13 56 7 Solar Powered Holiday Lights 69 4 74 8 Voice Light 68 7 69 9 Cleaning Light 58 12 60 10 Light Stems 58 18 31 ** 11 Permanent Outdoor Lighting System 54 6 71 * 12 Energizing Light 54 15 48 13 Atmosphere Creator 52 9 64 14 Color Creator 52 17 32 * 15 Sky Scaper 50 16 45 16 Bath & Spa Candle 48 10 63 17 Sleep-ease 45 14 56 18 Rise & Gently Shine 45 11 62 + 19 Revitalight 45 19 27 * 20 Plug-in Lighting 40 20 18 ** 21 Snow Drapery 28 21 7 *** Juicy Bits    R.Market; 7/7 top, + 1 with sig. difference  The same no. of av. ideas but much clearer on which ideas are weaker

Slide 15: Predictive Market Experiment 3 - UK Significance Base Base Base Significance Screener vs. Marmite Screener Tgt Marmite Monadic Tgt Marmite R.Market Crowd Monadic vs. Monadic Def + Prob Buy 87-95 Def + Prob Buy 150 Def + Prob Buy 500 R.Market Marmite Walkers 72 95 x x x x ** Marmite Mini Toasts 62 92 80 150 80 70 ** Marmite Squeezy 63 89 79 150 84 129 Marmite Spreadable 71 87 73 150 81 57 *** Marmite Bites 65 88 73 150 95 40 Marmite Hula Hoops 61 90 x x x x + Marmite Crackers 60 97 72 150 84 31 *** McCain Marmite Wedges 40 96 69 150 62 45 *** + Marmite Cheese Bites 47 93 69 150 52 46 Marmite Marbled Cheddar 57 88 64 150 63 87 Marmite Quavers 55 93 x x x x *** ** Marmite Seasoning 49 91 64 150 41 49 + Marmite Soldiers x x 64 150 50 62 Marmite Mini Rice Snacks x x 64 150 50 48 *** Marmite Barrel Nuts 52 89 61 150 36 61 Marmite Squeezable Portion Pack 43 96 x x x x Marmite Buttery Spread 39 99 x x x x *** *** Marmite Cream Cheese 38 91 59 150 9 107 *** *** McCain Marmite Home Fries 31 89 55 150 26 82 Marmite Rusk Soldiers 28 92 x x x x *** *** Marmite Brunch Bar 22 95 51 150 11 152 Juicy Bits    R.Market; 5/5 top, only 1 with sig. difference & clearer on weaker ideas x = Only tested in the 1st screener, so no comparative data available  Screener; 2/5 top, 3 with sig. diff. / Av. ideas; Mon=7, Screener=5, R.M=3

Slide 16: Predictive Market Experiment 4 - Poland Significan R.Market Significanc R.Market Significanc R.Market ce (Sell / Buy e Monadic (Sell / Buy e Monadic (Sell / Buy Monadic Bases: Base vs. any vs. most vs. All Monadic Tgt shares) Base R.Market shares) Base R.Market Shares) Base R.Market Def + Prob 150- Def + Crowd (Any Def + Prob Crowd (All Def + Prob Crowd (All Buy 158 500 500 500 Prob Buy shares) Buy Shares) Buy Shares) New Cling-Gel 87 151 75.7 341 *** 73.3 225 *** 86.7 75 *** *** + New Plus 75 158 58.5 313 53.6 194 63.1 65 New Sink & Pipe ** *** Unblocker 73 150 61.5 366 55.3 235 69.2 91 Juicy Bits  In this experiment, only three concepts were tested. Therefore, to add a degree of sensitivity having asked which concept they’d buy / sell shares in, we asked how many shares they’d buy / sell (limited to 1000). The options were: - 250 shares - 500 shares - 750 shares - 1000 shares  Respondents who chose to buy / sell all 1,000 of their shares give the most accurate results when compared to the Bases Monadic Test.

Slide 17: Predictive Market Experiment 5 - Guatemala Predictive Markets Monadic Significant Purchase Purchase Difference Rank Base Rank Base Intention Intention 7UP Bite 1 83 166 Pepsi Cappuccino 2 69 219 Lipton Ice Tea 3 65 100 5 89 100 *** 7UP H2Oh! 4 56 97 2 92 101 *** Be Light 5 49 55 2 92 101 *** Tropicana Twister 6 38 90 2 92 100 *** Propel 7 29 92 1 99 100 *** Juicy Punch 7 29 76 Flavour Splash 9 22 109  Predictive Markets provides a wider spread in PI scores through aggregation of scores between buyers and sellers in a market place.  The PM scores rewards strong ideas and punishes weak concepts; making it easier, combined with other quant diagnostics and qualitative insights to identify progressive (highly potent and “on message” ideas). Nov 23, 2006 MENU

Slide 18: Possibilities for Market Research?

Slide 19: The Size of the Prize Monadic Test of 10 ideas Predictive Markets • Difficult to differentiate • Clarity on strong & weak ideas • Difficult to compare samples • All results are comparable • Costly targeted samples • Cheap convenience sample • Costly monadic approach • Cheaper ‘markets’ approach • Very time consuming process • Incredibly quick results