Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity

6,507

Published on

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
4 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
6,507
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
180
Comments
0
Likes
4
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • twitter related to my final paper
  • Transcript

    • 1. Youth culture , self-representation and digital identity
    • 2.
      • How are existing social formations transformed?
      • What new forms of social interaction have media technologies enabled?
      • How are conceptions of space and time altered through engaged with media?
      Main questions:
    • 3. The circle of culture cf. Hall, 1997
    • 4. How are existing social formations transformed?
        • „ Computer-based technologies enable the pro- cessing of more communication, in less time, across larger distances.“ Stalder, 2006
      „ Media technologies do not mediate between themselves and people. Rather, they mediate between people […]“ Askew, 2002
    • 5.
      • online media are especially suitable to construct and develop several identities of the self Turkle, 1998
      • the mobile phone has become a central device in the construction of young peoples individual identity Castells,Fernandez-Ardevol, Linchuan Qiu & Sey, 2006
      What new forms of social interaction have media technologies enabled?
    • 6. … using Twitter
      • For what porpuse you can use twitter?
      • Personal updates
      • Sharing links
      • Spreading ideas
      • Two levels of representation:
      • Personal events through „own“ specific language:
        • Short messages – only 140 characters
        • Messages are public
      • Constructing own images
    • 7.
      • Symbolic self-completion Wicklund & Gollwitzer, 1982
        • assumption: everyone pursuits to a definition of himself
        • until reached this self image there is tension
        • Individuals try to balancing a self-deficit
        • through symbolic things or actions
      • Impression management Mummendey, 1995
        • A reaction of a specific audience is expected and a feedback necessary
        • Aims: acceptance and sympathy & avoid of
        • refusal to encourage own self-confidence
      Possible motives for usage…
    • 8.
      • Personal Identity
        • sense of being an unique individual
      • Social Identity
        • results from being member of a group
        • In former times: nationality, race, gender, occupation,
        • sport club
        • Mediatization of the self
          • diversity of interest groups in online social networks
          • easy transition between those communities
      The modern identity concept cf. Tafjel, 1978; Turkle,1998; Utz, 2002
    • 9.
      • a person has not just one a stable and homogeneous identity
      • Identity consists of several fragments that permanently change
      • multiple, but coharent Turkle,1998
      • a live-long developing and new conceptualized patchwork Döring, 1999
      Digital Identity
    • 10.
      • Thompson, 1995; Askew 2002
      How are conceptions of space and time altered through engaged with media?
    • 11.
      • ICT enable more communication, in less time, across larger distances
      • online media are especially suitable to construct and develop several identities of the self
      • Mobile devices are very important for the youths identity
      • Twitter could be a useful tool to create and play with your own identity
      Conclusions
    • 12. Discussion
      • Do you use Twitter or the Facebook status bar?
      • Have you one or several fake online identities?
      • Twitter messages are public but are they relevant for the Public Sphere?
    • 13. References Askew, K. (2002).Introduction, in The Anthropology of media, A reader, ed. By Kelly Askew & Richard R. Wilk, Malden Ma & Oxford UK: Blackwell. Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., Linchuan Qiu, J. & Sey, A. (2006).Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective, Cambridge: MIT Press. Ginsburg, F. ( 2002). Fieldwork at the Movies: Anthropology and Media, in Exotic No More: Anthropology on the Front Lines, ed. Jeremy MacClancy, Univ. of Chicago Press, pp. 359–376. Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices London: SAGE Publications. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture- Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
    • 14. References Lull, J. (2007). Culture-on-Demand: Communication in a Crisis World. Boston: Blackwell Publishing. Micek, D., & Whitlock,W. (2008). Twitter Revolution: How Social Media and Mobile Marketing Is Changing the Way We Do Business & Market Online. Las Vegas: Xeno Press. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born Digital. New York: Basic Books .   Stalder, F. (2006). Manuel Castells -The Theory of the Network Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.   Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press. Thompson, J. (1995). The Media and Modernity: A social Theory of the Media, Stanford: University Press. Tomlinson, J. (2007). The Culture of Speed- The Coming of Immediacy. London: SAGE Publications.
    • 15. References Turkle, S. (1998). Leben im Netz. Hamburg: Rowohlt. Utz, S. (2002). Interaktion und Identität in virtuellen Gemeinschaften. In G. Bente, N. Krämer & A. Petersen (Hrsg.). Virtuelle Realitäten (S.159-180). Göttingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle: Hogrefe. Wicklund, R.A. &Gollwitzer, P.M. (1982). Symbolic self completion. HIllsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Winter, C. (2003). Die konfliktionäre kommunikative Artikulation von Identität im Kontext der Globalisierung von Medienkulturen. In C. Winter, T. Thomas & A. Hepp (Hrsg.). Medienidentitäten – Identität im Kontext von Globalisierung und Medienkultur (S. 49- 70). Köln: Herbert von Halem. http://technology.inc.com/networking/articles/200809/twitter.html

    ×